dlowan wrote:OK, Ok, Mr de Kere and other mins - your ideas for how the things SHOULD be marketed? Seriously! How they gonna do it?
I have already said what I'd do.
I'd lose the clichés. The empowerment and freedom nonsense. I don't expect the ads to actually be informational (gee, how informational are beer ads?) but if they wanted to go that route they could include stats about the density of the fibers, how well it absorbs.
I make fun of the wings but I actually think they is the type of thing that is good in ad campaigns. I haven't been using them long so I can't say whether it's a gimmick or not but that would be a differentiating factor. Dunno, if they make one with velcro they can tout that as well.
What makes me think the ads are substandard is not the complete lack of relevant information. Advertising has long been this way. It's long been based on the abstract element of human nature. Feelings, image etc. When people get tired of "image" based advertising then they create the ad industry equivalent to the un-PC movement. "Imageless". They'll do dumb crap like Sprite's commercials in which they'll peddle the image of not being swayed by having an image. Ok, I gotta say that one is pretty good. It's stupid but it goes over most people's heads so it works.
With the ads in question I'd cut out some of the more cheesy "empowerment" stuff. I have long suspected that the ad insustry is not as adept at marketing to women as it is to men but they have to be able to come up with something better.
Dunno, maybe gimmicks? I was kidding about the PDA but maybe an alarm? It'd go off when it sensed a leak.
[size=7]I swear upon my much maligned testes that Ise kidding.[/size]