CNN's Christiane Amanpour just confirmed that Israeli ground troops were also involved. ---BBB 9/11/07
September 7, 2007
Israel Is Officially Silent on Syrian Report It Entered Airspace
By ISABEL KERSHNER
New York Times
JERUSALEM, Sept. 6 ?- Israeli officials were tight-lipped on Thursday after Syria said that Israeli planes had violated its airspace early that morning and that Syrian air defenses had confronted the planes and repulsed them.
A Syrian military spokesman said that the Israeli planes had also dropped some munitions in unpopulated areas in the northern part of the country, according to the official Syrian news agency, SANA. The spokesman said there were no casualties or damage.
Israeli Army officials said only that they "are not accustomed to comment on reports of this nature." A government spokesman said he had "nothing to add." In a speech here Thursday evening, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert made no mention of the accusations from Syria. When asked about them by an Israeli journalist, he said, "I don't know what you are talking about."
The first official reports of Thursday's episode emerged, by Syrian accounts, more than 12 hours after it took place. Syrian officials were quoted in various media as saying that the Israeli aircraft had infiltrated Syrian airspace around 1 a.m. They added that the Israeli planes were flying low, and broke the sound barrier.
Syria's minister of information, Mohsen Bilal, told the satellite television network Al Jazeera, "Syria retains the right to determine the quality, type and nature of its response."
Syrian officials could not be reached directly for comment.
While the Israeli military would not comment, it seemed plausible that the Syrians had detected an Israeli overflight to test Syrian radar and reactions, and that the Syrian response caused the Israeli pilots to drop their munitions to fly higher and faster.
By late in the day, though, analysts and media on both sides seemed to be trying to scale down tensions over the reports. Israel's Channel 2 television reported that unnamed Syrian officials had said they had no intention of being drawn into a war on Israel's timetable or terms.
Samir Taqqi, a political analyst at the Orient Center for Studies, a research institute in Damascus, said the Syrian response would probably be measured. "I don't think you'll see it lash out," he said. "The response will be through a political mechanism, not military."
Eyal Zisser, a Syria expert at Tel Aviv University's Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies, said that if the Syrians had an interest in an escalation, he would have expected much shriller statements out of Damascus.
The Syrian announcements came after months of increasing tension between Israel and Syria, with both in a heightened state of alert along their border.
Some Syrian analysts in Damascus interpreted the reported incident as an Israeli provocation, possibly aimed at increasing the stakes between the two countries. Syria's president, Bashar al-Assad, has suggested that if Israel is not willing to resume negotiations for the return of the Golan Heights, which Israel captured in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, the alternative would be to try to regain the territory by force.
Thabet Salem, a Syrian political commentator, said of the day's reports, "Either this is in preparation for pushing Syria to peace talks by raising the stakes, or it's an attempt to abort any sort of calls for peace talks."
Formal peace talks between Israel and Syria broke down in 2000. Mr. Olmert has said he would be willing to resume talks if Syria showed its intentions were genuinely peaceful, for example by stopping its support for Hezbollah in Lebanon and for Palestinian militant factions based in Damascus.
Separately on Thursday, 10 Palestinian militants were killed in clashes with Israel in Gaza. Four were killed in clashes with an Israeli force in southern Gaza, Palestinian medical officials and the Israeli Army said.
In addition, six members of Islamic Jihad were killed, the army said, when they approached the Gaza perimeter fence in two vehicles. Islamic Jihad said in a statement that it had intended to attack an Israeli military post.
-----------------------------------------------
US Confirms Israeli Strikes Hit Syrian Target Last Week
US Confirms Israeli Strikes Hit Syrian Target Last Week
By Mark Mazzetti and Helene Cooper
The New York Times
Wednesday 12 September 2007
Washington - After days of silence from the Israeli government, American officials confirmed Tuesday that Israeli warplanes launched airstrikes inside Syria last week, the first such attack since 2003.
A Defense Department official said Israeli jets had struck at least one target in northeastern Syria last Thursday, but the official said it was still unclear exactly what the jets hit and the extent of the bombing damage.
Syria has lodged a protest at the United Nations in response to the airstrike, accusing Israel of "flagrant violation" of its airspace. But Israel's government has repeatedly declined to comment on the matter.
Officials in Washington said that the most likely targets of the raid were weapons caches that Israel's government believes Iran has been sending the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah through Syria. Iran and Syria are Hezbollah's primary benefactors, and American intelligence officials say a steady flow of munitions from Iran runs through Syria and into Lebanon.
In the summer of 2006, during fighting between Israeli and Hezbollah forces, the militant group fired hundreds of missiles into Israel, surprising Israel with the extent and sophistication of its arsenal. Israel has tried repeatedly to get the United Nations to prevent the arms shipments across the Syria-Lebanon border.
One Bush administration official said Israel had recently carried out reconnaissance flights over Syria, taking pictures of possible nuclear installations that Israeli officials believed might have been supplied with material from North Korea. The administration official said Israeli officials believed that North Korea might be unloading some of its nuclear material on Syria.
"The Israelis think North Korea is selling to Iran and Syria what little they have left," the official said. He said it was unclear whether the Israeli strike had produced any evidence that might validate that belief.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were discussing a military action by another government.
In a letter circulated to members of the Security Council on Tuesday, Syria's ambassador to the United Nations, Bashar Jaafari, said Israel dropped munitions though they did not cause any "material damage."
Syria made its protest via Qatar, the Arab representative on the Security Council, United Nations officials said. Security Council representatives discussed the issue on Tuesday, but did not come to any conclusions.
Neither Israel nor the United States has spoken publicly on the airstrikes. The State Department spokesman, Sean D. McCormack, referred all questions to Israel and Syria, and a spokesman for the Israeli Embassy in Washington declined to comment.
Tensions between Israel and Syria have escalated over the past year, since the end of the Israel-Hezbollah war in Lebanon, and both countries remain in a heightened state of alert along their common border.
Syria's president, Bashar al-Assad, has said that if Israel is not willing to resume negotiations for the return of the Golan Heights, which Israel captured in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, the alternative would be to try to regain the territory by force.
Formal peace talks between Israel and Syria broke down in 2000.
0 Replies
FreeDuck
1
Reply
Thu 13 Sep, 2007 08:45 am
bookmark
0 Replies
BumbleBeeBoogie
1
Reply
Mon 17 Sep, 2007 10:19 am
Israelis ?'blew apart Syrian nuclear cache'
From The Sunday London Times
September 16, 2007
Israelis ?'blew apart Syrian nuclear cache'
Secret raid on Korean shipment
IT was just after midnight when the 69th Squadron of Israeli F15Is crossed the Syrian coast-line. On the ground, Syria's formidable air defences went dead. An audacious raid on a Syrian target 50 miles from the Iraqi border was under way.
At a rendezvous point on the ground, a Shaldag air force commando team was waiting to direct their laser beams at the target for the approaching jets. The team had arrived a day earlier, taking up position near a large underground depot. Soon the bunkers were in flames.
Ten days after the jets reached home, their mission was the focus of intense speculation this weekend amid claims that Israel believed it had destroyed a cache of nuclear materials from North Korea.
The Israeli government was not saying. "The security sources and IDF [Israeli Defence Forces] soldiers are demonstrating unusual courage," said Ehud Olmert, the prime minister. "We naturally cannot always show the public our cards."
The Syrians were also keeping mum. "I cannot reveal the details," said Farouk al-Sharaa, the vice-president. "All I can say is the military and political echelon is looking into a series of responses as we speak. Results are forthcoming." The official story that the target comprised weapons destined for Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed Lebanese Shi'ite group, appeared to be crumbling in the face of widespread scepticism.
Andrew Semmel, a senior US State Department official, said Syria might have obtained nuclear equipment from "secret suppliers", and added that there were a "number of foreign technicians" in the country.
Asked if they could be North Korean, he replied: "There are North Korean people there. There's no question about that." He said a network run by AQ Khan, the disgraced creator of Pakistan's nuclear weapons, could be involved.
But why would nuclear material be in Syria? Known to have chemical weapons, was it seeking to bolster its arsenal with something even more deadly?
Alternatively, could it be hiding equipment for North Korea, enabling Kim Jong-il to pretend to be giving up his nuclear programme in exchange for economic aid? Or was the material bound for Iran, as some authorities in America suggest?
According to Israeli sources, preparations for the attack had been going on since late spring, when Meir Dagan, the head of Mossad, presented Olmert with evidence that Syria was seeking to buy a nuclear device from North Korea.
The Israeli spy chief apparently feared such a device could eventually be installed on North-Korean-made Scud-C missiles.
"This was supposed to be a devastating Syrian surprise for Israel," said an Israeli source. "We've known for a long time that Syria has deadly chemical warheads on its Scuds, but Israel can't live with a nuclear warhead."
An expert on the Middle East, who has spoken to Israeli participants in the raid, told yesterday's Washington Post that the timing of the raid on September 6 appeared to be linked to the arrival three days earlier of a ship carrying North Korean material labelled as cement but suspected of concealing nuclear equipment.
The target was identified as a northern Syrian facility that purported to be an agricultural research centre on the Euphrates river. Israel had been monitoring it for some time, concerned that it was being used to extract uranium from phosphates.
According to an Israeli air force source, the Israeli satellite Ofek 7, launched in June, was diverted from Iran to Syria. It sent out high-quality images of a northeastern area every 90 minutes, making it easy for air force specialists to spot the facility.
Early in the summer Ehud Barak, the defence minister, had given the order to double Israeli forces on its Golan Heights border with Syria in anticipation of possible retaliation by Damascus in the event of air strikes.
Sergei Kirpichenko, the Russian ambassador to Syria, warned President Bashar al-Assad last month that Israel was planning an attack, but suggested the target was the Golan Heights.
Israeli military intelligence sources claim Syrian special forces moved towards the Israeli outpost of Mount Hermon on the Golan Heights. Tension rose, but nobody knew why.
At this point, Barak feared events could spiral out of control. The decision was taken to reduce the number of Israeli troops on the Golan Heights and tell Damascus the tension was over. Syria relaxed its guard shortly before the Israeli Defence Forces struck.
Only three Israeli cabinet ministers are said to have been in the know - Olmert, Barak and Tzipi Livni, the foreign minister. America was also consulted. According to Israeli sources, American air force codes were given to the Israeli air force attaché in Washington to ensure Israel's F15Is would not mistakenly attack their US counterparts.
Once the mission was under way, Israel imposed draconian military censorship and no news of the operation emerged until Syria complained that Israeli aircraft had violated its airspace. Syria claimed its air defences had engaged the planes, forcing them to drop fuel tanks to lighten their loads as they fled.
But intelligence sources suggested it was a highly successful Israeli raid on nuclear material supplied by North Korea.
Washington was rife with speculation last week about the precise nature of the operation. One source said the air strikes were a diversion for a daring Israeli commando raid, in which nuclear materials were intercepted en route to Iran and hauled to Israel. Others claimed they were destroyed in the attack.
There is no doubt, however, that North Korea is accused of nuclear cooperation with Syria, helped by AQ Khan's network. John Bolton, who was undersecretary for arms control at the State Department, told the United Nations in 2004 the Pakistani nuclear scientist had "several other" customers besides Iran, Libya and North Korea.
Some of his evidence came from the CIA, which had reported to Congress that it viewed "Syrian nuclear intentions with growing concern".
"I've been worried for some time about North Korea and Iran outsourcing their nuclear programmes," Bolton said last week. Syria, he added, was a member of a "junior axis of evil", with a well-established ambition to develop weapons of mass destruction.
The links between Syria and North Korea date back to the rule of Kim Il-sung and President Hafez al-Assad in the last century. In recent months, their sons have quietly ordered an increase in military and technical cooperation.
Foreign diplomats who follow North Korean affairs are taking note. There were reports of Syrian passengers on flights from Beijing to Pyongyang and sightings of Middle Eastern businessmen from sources who watch the trains from North Korea to China.
On August 14, Rim Kyong Man, the North Korean foreign trade minister, was in Syria to sign a protocol on "cooperation in trade and science and technology". No details were released, but it caught Israel's attention.
Syria possesses between 60 and 120 Scud-C missiles, which it has bought from North Korea over the past 15 years. Diplomats believe North Korean engineers have been working on extending their 300-mile range. It means they can be used in the deserts of northeastern Syria - the area of the Israeli strike.
The triangular relationship between North Korea, Syria and Iran continues to perplex intelligence analysts. Syria served as a conduit for the transport to Iran of an estimated £50m of missile components and technology sent by sea from North Korea. The same route may be in use for nuclear equipment.
But North Korea is at a sensitive stage of negotiations to end its nuclear programme in exchange for security guarantees and aid, leading some diplomats to cast doubt on the likelihood that Kim would cross America's "red line" forbidding the proliferation of nuclear materials.
Christopher Hill, the State Department official representing America in the talks, said on Friday he could not confirm "intelligence-type things", but the reports underscored the need "to make sure the North Koreans get out of the nuclear business".
By its actions, Israel showed it is not interested in waiting for diplomacy to work where nuclear weapons are at stake.
As a bonus, the Israelis proved they could penetrate the Syrian air defence system, which is stronger than the one protecting Iranian nuclear sites.
This weekend President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran sent Ali Akbar Mehrabian, his nephew, to Syria to assess the damage. The new "axis of evil" may have lost one of its spokes.
0 Replies
BumbleBeeBoogie
1
Reply
Fri 21 Sep, 2007 10:36 am
Bush Declines to Lift Veil of Secrecy Over Israeli Airstrike
September 21, 2007
Bush Declines to Lift Veil of Secrecy Over Israeli Airstrike on Syria
By STEVEN LEE MYERS and STEVEN ERLANGER
New York Times
WASHINGTON, Sept. 20 ?- President Bush pointedly declined on Thursday to discuss an Israeli airstrike in northern Syria on Sept. 6 that Israeli officials say hit a nuclear-related facility that North Korea was helping to equip.
Mr. Bush did, however, warn North Korea that the United States expected it to dismantle its nuclear weapons programs and to stop selling weapons or expertise abroad, as it promised to do this year. He emphasized that he was speaking generally, not specifically, about whether North Korea provided assistance to Syria.
"I'm not going to comment on the matter," Mr. Bush repeated twice when asked about the strike at a news conference at the White House. When pressed, he added, "Saying I'm not going to comment on the matter means I'm not going to comment on the matter."
Mr. Bush's remarks ?- a relatively rare instance of a president flatly declining to comment ?- also reflected the extraordinary secrecy here in Washington surrounding the raid. Most details of what was struck, where, and how remain shrouded in official silence.
A day earlier, Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli opposition leader and former prime minister, became the first public figure in Israel to acknowledge that an attack even took place. Until now the only public information about the raid has been a muted and vague diplomatic protest from Syria that Israel had violated its airspace and a condemnation by North Korea's Foreign Ministry of what it called "a very dangerous provocation."
In a television interview on Wednesday evening, Mr. Netanyahu said: "When the prime minister takes action in important and necessary matters, and generally when the government is doing things for the security of Israel, I give it my endorsement. I was party to this matter, I must say, from the first minute, and I gave it my backing, but it is still too early to discuss this subject."
Mr. Netanyahu faced criticism for saying as much as he did.
One former diplomat who has spoken to Israelis involved in the decision to attack said the airstrike was aimed at what Israel believed to be a Syrian nuclear program in cooperation with North Korea. The two countries already have a relationship that has concentrated on missile technology, which North Korea has long exported.
The former diplomat, along with current and former American and Israeli officials, said a shipment of North Korean material labeled as cement arrived by ship three days before the attack. That material was transferred to a facility, which Israel bombed.
Current and former American and Israeli officials have said the Israelis gave the Bush administration advance notice of the attack.
North Korea's public reaction prompted speculation about a possible link to the Syrian target, though whether the target involved nuclear activity, missiles or something else remained unknown to all but a handful of officials briefed on what had happened.
This week China abruptly canceled a new round of diplomatic talks that had been planned to discuss a schedule for disbanding North Korea's nuclear facilities under a deal negotiated in February. It is not clear when those talks may resume.
Mr. Bush said Thursday that the United States expected the North Koreans "to honor their commitment to give up weapons and weapons programs, and to the extent that they are proliferating, we expect them to stop that proliferation."
Some current and former American officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because information about the raid remained classified, said they believed that the site was involved in Syria's missile program. They said that Israeli intelligence officials believed that they had evidence that the activity at the site involved North Korean engineers believed to work in the nuclear program.
So far, several current and former American officials who have been involved in evaluating the Israeli claims say they are not yet convinced of a nuclear connection. Yet the enormous secrecy around the findings, both here and in Israel, suggests that the activity that prompted the Israeli attack involved "more than a run-of-the-mill missile transaction," one official said, noting that the Israelis took considerable risks in carrying out the attack.
"The Israelis are very proud of what they are doing; they are boasting about it," said one senior American official who has been dealing with Israeli officials. "But we don't know enough yet about what they actually hit."
In Israel, military censors have prohibited the press from reporting any details, while Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's government has succeeded in remaining silent about the raid. The head of Israel's military intelligence, Gen. Amos Yadlin, appeared to refer to the matter obliquely when he told the cabinet that Israel had "restored its deterrence" in the region.
The deputy chairman of the Israel Atomic Energy Commission, Gideon Frank, warned delegates at the International Atomic Energy Agency on Wednesday in Vienna that Israel could not ignore the efforts of various countries in the Middle East to develop weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver them.
"We can hardly remain oblivious to intensive efforts by some in our region to develop W.M.D. and their means of delivery, accompanied by sustained denial of the very legitimacy of our sovereign existence and calls for our destruction," Mr. Frank said in remarks that were interpreted to refer to Syria, as well as to Iran.
----------------------------------------------
Steven Lee Myers reported from Washington, and Steven Erlanger from Jerusalem. David E. Sanger contributed reporting from Washington.
0 Replies
dyslexia
1
Reply
Fri 21 Sep, 2007 10:42 am
Israel's opposition leader, Binyamin Netanyahu, has given the first confirmation from his country of a mysterious air strike on an unknown target deep in Syria earlier this month - fuelling frenzied speculation about exactly what happened.
The leader of the rightwing Likud party said he had given the prime minister, Ehud Olmert, his backing for the attack, which Damascus said took place on September 6. Before that, the Israeli government had enforced a news blackout on the story.
Asked during a TV interview, Mr Netanyahu said: "When a prime minister does something that is important and necessary to Israel's security ... I give my backing." He refused to give further details.
0 Replies
BumbleBeeBoogie
1
Reply
Fri 21 Sep, 2007 10:51 am
BBB Was Israel's attack inside Syria a rehearsal for a similar attack inside Iran?---BBB
Fury as Netanyahu confirms Syria strike
By Donald Macintyre in Jerusalem
Published: 21 September 2007
Independent UK
Benjamin Netanyahu, leader of the right-wing opposition party Likud, was chacteristically at the centre of a controversy yesterday after appearing to be the first Israeli politician to confirm an air strike against Syria two weeks ago.
With reporting in Israel covoered by military censorship, Mr Netanyahu startled television viewers - and reportedly shocked the office of the Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert - by answering a question about the supposed air strike in an interview.
Mr Netanyahu, a former prime minister, infuriated some of his political opponents by telling Channel One television that he was "party" to the operation on which he had personally congratulated Olmert. He declared " When the Prime Minister takes action in important and necessary matters, and generally when the government is doing things for the security of Israel, I give it my endorsement. I was party to this matter, I must say, from the first minute and I gave it my backing, but it is still too early to discuss this subject." Israel's government has maintained a studious, and unusual, silence since Syria first complained about an incursion into its airspace.
The row came as US President George Bush - while refusing to confirm what US officials have been anonymously briefing for more than a week was a strike on a suspected nuclear facility built with North Korean help - warned against nuclear prolifetration by North Korea.
Eitan Cabel, secretary general of the Labour Party, told Army Radio that Mr Netanyahu had been guilty of "an outburst that is severe, stupid and irresponsible". Mr Cabel, whose party leader, Ehud Barak, is seen by his supporters as the main rival to Mr Netanyahu for the future premiership, declared: "Bibi [Mr Netanyahu's nickname] is the same Bibi. I haven no idea if it is foolishness, stupidity, the desire to jump on the bandwagon, the desire to be a partner, to steal credit - or something else. It is simply very dangerous. The man simply does not deserve to lead."
An anonymous official said to be close to Mr Olmert was quoted in the Haaretz newspaper as saying: "Bibi's slip of the tongue borders on national irresponsibility. Once again Netanyahu couldn't restrain himself and he ran to tell the guys."
The political row - fuelled by party divisions - followed a declaration by Shimon Peres, the Israeli President, on Tuesday that the tensions caused by the incident were "over" and the government was prepared for talks with Syria aimed at ending the 40 years of emnity between the two countries since Israel captured the Golan heights in the Six Day War in 1967.
Some right- wing politicians went to Mr Netanyahu's defence, with the Likud Knesset member Yuval Steinitz saying: "Netanyahu's statements were unfortunate, but they caused no harm. This is a tempest in a tea cup."
Ehud Barak - who has refrained from any comment either on the supposed Israeli operation or on Mr Netanyahu's comments, said: "It is a pity that the aides of the worst prime minister in the history of the state seek out every opportunity to incite against Netanyahu, and permit themselves to use language that is lowly and contemptible, albeit typical."
Meanwhile the European Union is calling on Israel to consider tighter sanctions on Gaza by cutting power and fuel in response to Qassam rocket attacks. Javier Solana, the EU foreign affairs chief, said: "We join the call by the secretary general of the United Nations for the Israeli government to reconsider its decision."
The European Commission, which helped coordinate emergency aid to Palestinians after the election victory of the militant Islamist group Hamas prompted the West to suspend direct aid to the territories, also urged Israel to reconsider. "The Commission hopes that Israel will not find it necessary to implement the measures for which the decisions set the framework yesterday," a spokeswoman for the EU executive said. The United Nations secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, urged Israel on Wednesday to reconsider its decision to declare the Gaza Strip a hostile territory, warning that any cut-off of vital services would violate international law and punish the already suffering civilian population. Mr Ban said he was very concerned at the Israeli government's "announced intent to interrupt essential services such as electricity and fuel to the civilian population".
0 Replies
BumbleBeeBoogie
1
Reply
Sat 22 Sep, 2007 09:23 am
Syria strike: US shared intelligence with Israel
Syria strike: US shared intelligence with Israel
By Leonard Doyle in Washington
Published: 22 September 2007
Independent UK
Before it bombed Syria, Israel provided the US with intelligence suggesting that North Korea was secretly supplying Damascus with nuclear technology, The Washington Post newspaper claimed yesterday.
However, there is considerable scepticism of the intelligence that prompted Israel's attack, with some proliferation experts querying whether Syria is even attempting to acquire nuclear weapons. The quality of the Israeli intelligence is also unknown, as is the extent of North Korean co-operation. Some people have suggested that a North Korean ship merely unloaded items it no longer needed.
The Bush administration has not commented on the Israeli raid or the details of the intelligence, which President George Bush was handed during the summer. The US reportedly corroborated some of the original intelligence it received from Israel, but fears remained that any immediate action would bring an end to negotiations aimed at persuading North Korea to abandon its nuclear programme.
The target of the Israeli bombers was reported to be in northern Syria, near the Turkish border. To maintain secrecy, the details of the mission were given to the pilots who conducted the attack only after they were in the air, the newspaper said.
The Israeli intelligence included satellite images, according to anonymous sources quoted by the paper. Most details about the alleged North Korean-Syrian connection remain unknown.
At a press conference on Thursday, President Bush refused to answer questions about Israel's air strikes in Syria. "I'm not going to comment on the matter," Mr Bush said.
Israel is also refusing to discuss the raid, although Benjamin Netanyahu, the leader of the Likud party, told Israeli television that he knew of the operation. In Syria, officials said its air defence forced Israel's jets to flee. It has also warned that it may retaliate.
Syria has denied receiving North Korean nuclear technology and Pyongyang has also denied any such deal.
0 Replies
Walter Hinteler
1
Reply
Sat 22 Sep, 2007 09:55 am
Source: The Globe and Mail Weekend, 22.09.07, page 14
Israeli air strike on Syria shrouded in secrecy as speculation mounts about the target
Washington won't comment on reports that North Korea was helping Damascus build a nuclear weapon
SONIA VERMA
Special to The Globe and Mail
September 22, 2007
JERUSALEM -- It began as a mysterious mission into enemy land, but is quickly becoming Israel's worst kept secret.
When Syria announced two weeks ago that its forces had opened fire on an Israeli aircraft that had infiltrated its airspace and bombed its territory, some dismissed it as a far-fetched Syrian conspiracy theory.
Others feared it could lead to the start of all-out war between the two archenemies.
But over the past couple of weeks, in dribs and drabs, a theory has emerged: A North Korean ship had arrived in Syria carrying clandestine cargo destined for a facility near the Turkish border that was part of a nascent nuclear weapons program. North Korean nuclear experts were rumoured to be in Syria at the time, and Israel decided to attack.
The truth is, Israeli officials won't divulge the motive behind the Syrian operation. Most won't even acknowledge it happened, maintaining an unusual "wall of silence" in a country where such secrets often seep out.
And a rare media blackout imposed by Israeli authorities on local journalists has prevented those best placed to find out the truth from reporting it. Any journalist who breaks the code of silence could face jail time.
The censorship means most accounts of what really happened the night of Sept. 6 come from unnamed sources, state news agencies and anonymous Internet blogs. This hasn't slowed speculation over exactly what did happen - the most contentious theory being the joint nuclear project.
Those reports are now raising tensions between the old rivals to dangerous new levels.
"This comes at a time when there is already a lot of fear about a war with Syria," said one Israeli military observer, who did not want to be named because of the media blackout.
"What we have now is a lot of conjecture and not a lot of facts. People are accusing Syria of many things. And if we're not careful those accusations could become self-fulfilling prophecies," the observer said.
After the air strike, Israel remained uncharacteristically silent, flatly denying its warplanes were even involved in an operation - until this week when Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's hawkish opposition leader, broke that silence with an apparent slip of the tongue.
Asked during a television interview to comment on "that operation that is so cloaked in secrecy," he said: "I was privy to the matter from the outset and I gave my backing. But it's too early to be discussing this."
His comments, however cryptic, were the first official admission that something in Syria was targeted. But rumours were already rife about what the air raid involved.
One guess was that the attack was a shot over the bow - meant to test the readiness of Syria's anti-missile defence capabilities. Another story holds that Israel targeted a conventional-weapons transfer to Hezbollah.
Yet another posits the attack was an assassination attempt on Khaled Meshaal, leader-in-exile of the militant Hamas movement.
"At the end of the day, each of those theories is as good as the next one. Those who know the truth think secrecy is the best way to handle the truth and we have to trust them," said Yaakov Amidror, former deputy chief of intelligence for the Israeli Army.
Most Israelis agree. According to polls, most say they feel safer since Sept. 6 and believe the operation was a success.
A week after the air strike, Israel's chief of military intelligence told the Knesset that Israel's "deterrence capabilities" had been restored.
He pointedly refused to comment about a specific mission in Syria, but his remarks were reassuring to the Israeli public, whose faith in their military was badly shaken by last year's failed war with Hezbollah in Lebanon.
"The public assumes something was done and accepts that it shouldn't be discussed for their own protection. They feel comforted knowing the army succeeded at something," said Uzi Arad, director of the Institute for Policy and Strategy at the Herzliya Interdisciplinary Centre and a former intelligence director for the Mossad, Israel's intelligence agency.
Others believe Israel's silence is strategic in other ways.
"The silence, for Israel is a very smart move. As long as they keep things quiet, the target can be whatever they want it to be," one local analyst said of Israel's relations with Syria.
Yesterday, Washington declined comment on reports the target of the Israeli raid was a nuclear facility built with a North Korean help.
"There are lots of things that we know about and learn about in this building that we don't share with you from this podium," White House spokesman Tony Fratto said.
Syria has denounced what it calls U.S. "lies" that it was receiving nuclear material from North Korea.
Pyongyang has denied helping Syria, insisting it is honouring an earlier pledge forbidding the transfer of nuclear material as part of a deal brokered in six-party talks in February that won the communist state diplomatic concessions.
Experts point out that it simply doesn't make sense that North Korea would jeopardize that agreement by shipping nuclear weapons to Syria.
But here in Israel, despite stubborn official silence -- the story refuses to die.
"There is a feeling the story will get out sooner or later," Mr. Arad said.
"It's not that people think the story will be buried forever, but these days the truth is a matter of time."
Strike force
Israel has more sophisticated military capabilities than any of its neighbours, able to strike targets thousands of kilometres away before its enemies can effectively react.
TALL AL ABYAD AL ATIQ, SYRIA
Agricultural research centre Israel may have bombed earlier this month, possibly suspecting Syria was using it as part of a nuclear weapons program.
OSIRAK, IRAQ
Nuclear materials testing reactor Israel destroyed in 1981, suspecting it would be used to produce weapons.
NATANZ, IRAN
Uranium enrichment facility Israel and the United States suspect is used for nuclear weapons purposes.
PLANES
F-15L/F-16L: When fitted with long-range fuel tanks, Israel's most advanced strike jets are capable of hitting targets 2,225 km away.
MISSILES
Jericho III: Less is known about Israel's missile capabilities, but it's thought that its latest such weapon can strike targets at least 4,800 km away.
TONIA COWAN/THE GLOBE AND MAIL
SOURCES: GLOBAL SECURITY ORG., WISCONSIN PROJECT ON NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL
0 Replies
oralloy
1
Reply
Sat 22 Sep, 2007 12:21 pm
Re: Syria strike: US shared intelligence with Israel
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Before it bombed Syria, Israel provided the US with intelligence suggesting that North Korea was secretly supplying Damascus with nuclear technology, The Washington Post newspaper claimed yesterday.
Israelis seized nuclear material in Syrian raidUzi
September 23, 2007
Israelis seized nuclear material in Syrian raid
Uzi Mahnaimi and Sarah Baxter
London Times
Also from Sarah Baxter: Snatched: Israeli commandos ?'nuclear' raid
Israeli commandos seized nuclear material of North Korean origin during a daring raid on a secret military site in Syria before Israel bombed it this month, according to informed sources in Washington and Jerusalem.
The attack was launched with American approval on September 6 after Washington was shown evidence the material was nuclear related, the well-placed sources say.
They confirmed that samples taken from Syria for testing had been identified as North Korean. This raised fears that Syria might have joined North Korea and Iran in seeking to acquire nuclear weapons.
Israeli special forces had been gathering intelligence for several months in Syria, according to Israeli sources. They located the nuclear material at a compound near Dayr az-Zwar in the north.
Evidence that North Korean personnel were at the site is said to have been shared with President George W Bush over the summer. A senior American source said the administration sought proof of nuclear-related activities before giving the attack its blessing.
Diplomats in North Korea and China believe a number of North Koreans were killed in the strike, based on reports reaching Asian governments about conversations between Chinese and North Korean officials.
Syrian officials flew to Pyongyang, the North Korean capital, last week, reinforcing the view that the two nations were coordinating their response.