Chai wrote:I disagree - I think you have a very different definition of the word rich. Rich is not eating foi gras every day and hiring someone whose only job is clipping your toenails. Perhaps that is part of why you have this instinctive (but misplaced) feeling toward the "rich", because you're only thinking of the "idle rich"
Uhmm, no. After all, I wrote:
In fact, there's many rich people who live like that, just spending with only a rough idea of their current balance -- [..] just like there's rich people who know the whereabouts of their every last penny.
I dont think of the rich only as the people who spend without thinking; I think of the rich as well, the rich. Those who have a lot of money compared to most other people. End. They include fastidious budgeters, and they include lazy spendthrifts. I'm not sure what you're saying on that count - do you disagree, really?
I think there's also poor people who are spendthrifts as long or as soon as they get some money, just like there are poor people who are absolutely meticulous with money, and indeed have to be in order to survive, keep a roof over their head and food on the table.
Like I said - I just dont see how you can extrapolate how I described my instinctive feelings about rich and poor people towards some kind of judgement about people who watch their money carefully. There's little correlation.
Chai wrote:OK, nimh...define specifcally what is "rich" to you....
Depends greatly on where you live. Being rich in Hungary is not the same as being rich in the Netherlands is not the same as being rich in the US.
I dunno - top 20% of the population in terms of wealth?
(Thats wealth not wages; the richer people are, the less their wealth derives, relatively, from wages.)
Chai wrote:But, your chances of getting to your destination is vastly improved if you have a plan.
Sure. But in practice, generally not enough to lift you from the bottom 10% of society to its median, or from its median to the top 10%, unless you've had a share of good luck mixed in as well. Like I said, there's plenty of people who are meticulous about their financial planning and are still poor. There's plenty of people who are spendthrifts who still remain rich.
In short: hard work and fastidious planning, though surely useful and important, in this society makes up only a small part of where in the socio-economic pyramid you'll find yourself, alas.
Chai wrote:For instance, it's all well and good to say money isn't important to you...but seriously, do you not think of what your standard of living will be 20, 40, 50 years from now?
Yes, money is important. I just dont have much of a grasp on it. And of course I worry. I never said I was
proud of my lack of grasp.
I just dont see the parallel you're trying to draw with our previous discussion about how I feel towards the rich, and towards the down-and-out, in our countries.
Bad instinctive feelings towards the rich does not correspond with any specific feeling towards the fastidious and well-planned, as the groups are hardly the same - some rich people are fastidious, others are not. Likewise, instinctive sympathy for the poor does not correspond with any feeling toward those who are bad or careless at managing money; I think it would be naive to suggest any equation. I dunno - the link you're making between the two conversations is just not there.
Chai wrote:I don't obsess about or live in the future, but I'm aware it's there.
Good for you (add exclamation mark or whatever is needed to avoid impression I'm being sarcastical or whatever).