Multi Universes

I'm not sure what you're talking about, but I can say that the "many worlds" interpretation of quantum mechanics was first done Hugh Everett in the late 50s, and then elaborated by others. He noticed that quantum theory was consistent with an interpretation in which, instead of collapse of the wave function when an observation occurred, all possible evolutions of the quantum system occurred, and a particular one is selected out by an observer. This suggests that there are an enormous number of worlds branching off from the present one at any moment.

This is not a universally accepted interpretation by physicists. Some have insisted that it is not falsifiable and therefore not a scientific theory. There has even been proposed a "quantum suicide" test of the theory in which a scientists sits with a gun pointed at his head with the pull of the trigger being decided by a probabilistic event such as radioactive decay. This points to the absurdity of taking this interpretation too literally.

Hello IFeelFree

Just my bad luck that the only person to answer my proclamation is a fellow who starts off his postulate with the words "I'm not sure I know what you talking about!!!"

Well, there is no record of us ever noticing what you stated occurred in the fifties; nor could they of stated what they stated today -- or perhaps they weren't on track as they are today at Harvard.

Nevertheless, although you aren't in reference to my original post where I compliment the progress that is possible for us to actually contribute a real solution to all the equations, (as a representative of a mystical school of thought), I most certainly compliment you on your knowledge of history but nothing Hugh Everett stated in the 50s has any bearing on its extreme correspondence of the concept that reaches backward to ancient religion; and its actual use for occultists today. Rather, he did develop interest, I suppose, that resulted in the present equations that resemble the truth that we have expounding all along but as I've stated none of us saw or heard of him back then; so what is important is our meetings today with scientists to assist their naive attempt with equations concerning multi universes.
In accordance with the original forum category I posted to show how pleased I was with this.
By the way, I have already written Harvard offering my assistance; and of course they'll consider me a crackpot; but what's new?? LOL!

In a few weeks; when they completely ignore Me; I can go back to my apparent delusions; and you can go back to being this Ivy League intellectual forever debating issues.

I take it from your letter you don't want to hear more about the 0=2 equation; and other methods to actually enter other universes? No matter. It is important part of the scientific community to remain skeptical; and to adhere to the method of science.

I refer you back to my first and original post and the link thereof to study within yourself statements that adhere to the will of the conversation; complimenting you as a man of quick wit and even quicker study!!

Welcome to the forum sphinx718.

I think I'll go home now.

doesnt hawkings talk about this???

It seems to me that a few major problems are still being reported on in the news services. Maybe one of the other universes out there is the one you are referring to.

Just my bad luck
A mystic involved in the occult should not be having problems with "bad luck." You are in the service of the God of Good Luck! (Isaiah 65:11, 12)