1
   

My son asked me this...

 
 
Reply Thu 17 Jun, 2004 02:08 pm
Dad...where are we?
In the back yard son.
But where is that?
In michigan son.
But where is that?
In the USA.
But where is that?
On Earth.
But where is that?
In the solar system.
But where is that?
The universe.
But where is that?

I had no more answers.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,381 • Replies: 18
No top replies

 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jun, 2004 02:09 pm
It's all around us, even if we don't understand it.
0 Replies
 
the reincarnation of suzy
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jun, 2004 04:08 pm
Go ask your mother.
0 Replies
 
imdtckdkr
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jun, 2004 04:09 pm
or check the internet...you can find the answer for anything on the internet
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jun, 2004 04:28 pm
Next time, just wave your hand and say, "Over there." Seems as good an answer as any to me.
0 Replies
 
thethinkfactory
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jun, 2004 06:32 pm
In the lower left quadrant of the Milky Way Galaxy.

If he asks more you could answer - that in and infinite space one point is no closer to another. Thus the answer to your question is simply impossible.

TF
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jun, 2004 07:06 pm
the solar system is in the milky way galaxy is in the universe. you skipped a step, cleandrinkingwater. and thethinkfactory, you got the order wrong.

Also, your answer makes no sense: "that in and infinite space one point is no closer to another"

It looks like you made a typo..perhaps you meant to replace "and" with "an", which would make the statement grammatically correct...but it would still be false.
0 Replies
 
thethinkfactory
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jun, 2004 07:32 pm
How so... ? I agree with the typo... (thanks for unsolicited grammer lesson Wink ) but I am not sure I agree with the fact that I am incorrect.

I could arbitrarily choose two points that happen to be 'closer' to one another but in an infinite space that choice would simply be arbitrary.

Thus the concept of 'closer' seems to break down - unless you are speaking of finite space. Then closer makes sence.

Near and far are concepts that simply breakdown in infinite space. This is the same for closer or further away. You would have to presuppose a reference point. In a infinite universe there is no 'better' reference point than another. I guess we could chose our universe - but that would simply be arbitrarily chosing where we happen to be.

However, I, in looking again, think I have the whole point wrong anyway - the question was not - where are we in the universe - the question was - where is the universe.

To which I think that if our universe is all there is - then we are not anywhere. Again, if there is nothing outside of ouor universe - we are not anywhere - we simply are.

But do i think that will make sense to your son... it doesn't even really make sense to me! Wink

TF
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jun, 2004 09:30 pm
Quote:
"in an infinite space one point is no closer to another"


this means that for any and all points, all of them will be equidistant. the only way for all points in a space to be equistant from each other is for there to be only one distinct point, and this is synonymous with saying that an infinite large space has infinitely small space, and that is an oxymoron.

Quote:
Near and far are concepts that simply breakdown in infinite space. This is the same for closer or further away. You would have to presuppose a reference point. In a infinite universe there is no 'better' reference point than another. I guess we could chose our universe - but that would simply be arbitrarily chosing where we happen to be.


Furthermore, the referance point when measuring distance between two points is the other point. So yes, there is a distance between any two points in the universe...and infinite number of points and an infinite number of distances.

Quote:
However, I, in looking again, think I have the whole point wrong anyway - the question was not - where are we in the universe - the question was - where is the universe.

To which I think that if our universe is all there is - then we are not anywhere. Again, if there is nothing outside of ouor universe - we are not anywhere - we simply are.


By definition, the universe is the largest domain. Therefore, the answer to the question "where is the universe?" is "everywhere," not "nowhere"...and we are not in "nowhere"....cleardrinkingwater's first post already cleared that up.
0 Replies
 
cleandrinkingwater
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Jul, 2004 12:57 pm
Is it just that we can't understand the fact that we might be everywhere? How can there be something everywhere? Everywhere has to be somewhere right?
0 Replies
 
nn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Jul, 2004 04:43 pm
we only know what we're meant to know, we are on a lower conscious level, so to us, yes the ans. stop, but there's always an ans. on higher conscious level which will unfort. never be reached in our time.
0 Replies
 
fortune
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Jul, 2004 06:16 pm
Hmm, nn, that sounds a little defeatist. Isn't the point of philosophy to seek answers?

That aside, here's the way it goes. Our planet is the the third planet form the sun and the second last of the small 'rocky' planets. After Mars comes the gas giants. Our sun is a smallish yellow star roughly three quarters of the way out on an arm of a spiral galaxy, a galaxy being a large group of stars, 'spiral' means that when you look at it from the side it's sort of flat and it's spinning, kind of like a big frisbee (with arms Laughing).

It's not even a very big galaxy. In fact when you take a look at the other galaxies on the neighbourhood, we look down right puny. The 'universe' is everything. Everything. (think 'uni', like unicycle, or United States, it mean one). It's not just everything we know or everything we can see. It's everything. All. Which means it has no end. Because anything more would still be part of 'everything'.

As for the 'near/far' thing. I think we have a miscommunication. Yes, when you have infinite space, it doesn't seem to make sense to say that something is 'near'. Near compared to what? The answer is 'near compared to anything else'. (remember, everything is relative)

It's the same as saying that there is no such thing as fast or slow. After all, when you think about it, everything is moving. But if your just whizzing through limitless empty space, it's just the same as staying still because you aren't actually getting anywhere. So introduce another point of reference.

Now you might think that If something just popped into existence while you were whizzing along that it would immediately prove that you were moving all along. Nope. Cause maybe it's actually the other thing that's moving in he opposite direction. And of course it is, since there's no other point of reference. Smile

Same with the near/far thing. OK, so to us it seems that Pluto is far away. But compare that to how far away the next galaxy is and all of a sudden Pluto seems right next door. So near and far are relative terms. They're relative to the scale of what your talking about. They are not however useless. Nearer and Further are even more useful. Because it doesn't matter what the scale. Pluto will always be nearer than the next galaxy and Mars will always be nearer to us than either.

As for "where is the universe". Yup, it's everywhere and everything.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Jul, 2004 06:27 pm
Couldn't you have said "We are in Michigan, son. We are nowhere."
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Jul, 2004 06:32 pm
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
Couldn't you have said "We are in Michigan, son. We are nowhere."
Laughing
0 Replies
 
Rick d Israeli
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jul, 2004 03:26 pm
cleandrinkingwater, concerning your signature: you're welcome :wink:
0 Replies
 
akaMechsmith
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jul, 2004 03:42 pm
Stuh, Just to be certain Laughing Laughing Laughing I'd have added a Cosmos just in case :wink:
0 Replies
 
limbodog
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jul, 2004 01:03 pm
"I don't know" is a perfectly viable answer.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jul, 2004 01:56 pm
Yes, Limbodog. I don't think the son would be traumatized or confused by the confession. One might even say to our young sons that we don't know, that it's a WONDER-FUL mystery. And I would not be condescendng to him since I would say that to myself and to all of you.
0 Replies
 
limbodog
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jul, 2004 02:10 pm
JLNobody wrote:
Yes, Limbodog. I don't think the son would be traumatized or confused by the confession. One might even say to our young sons that we don't know, that it's a WONDER-FUL mystery. And I would not be condescendng to him since I would say that to myself and to all of you.


Not traumatized? Hrm... Better make something up then.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » My son asked me this...
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/18/2024 at 12:18:45