Tue 3 Jan, 2012 09:05 pm - [quote]So your god must have those properties but there is still no way to confirm it. Just like I can say, the flying pink elephant is necessary for any object to fly through the air. Without the... (view)
Tue 3 Jan, 2012 09:54 am - [quote]I never said it would disprove. But stating the opposite does not imply a god. It is assumed that the cause is a god. Even more so the people who claim the cause is a god, also somehow know... (view)
Mon 2 Jan, 2012 08:08 pm - I agree with this:
"My over all point is. What we think is important is not always what is important. We assume that it is, because we assume that life is necessary or important. Yet the... (view)
Mon 2 Jan, 2012 03:22 pm - Ok. So you don't have absolute certainty that a thing is white, it is only probable. Right?
By "ascription" do you mean that the whiteness comes from us and is imposed on the... (view)
Mon 2 Jan, 2012 09:52 am - So you don't doubt that you see "white", but you doubt that you correctly judge a thing to be white, correct?
If so, then my question is this: do you follow Kant when he says that... (view)
Sun 1 Jan, 2012 07:53 pm - I agree that God can do whatever He wants, else He is not God. But God could never want to contradict himself.
The point I'm making is that he deemed it good to give us free-will, to... (view)
Sun 1 Jan, 2012 07:07 pm - Ok, I see. That's understandable considering the Church has had various philosophers proposing differing views on perception.
Regarding your answer to this question which was selected, do... (view)
