Thu 3 Mar, 2005 01:40 pm - LOL
I would actually go so far as to say we should all wish we were so lucky as to be naive!!!
We are all ignorent.. but sometimes we get confused and start beiliving otherwise.. hopefully... (view)
Sat 26 Feb, 2005 12:45 pm - [quote="val"]Mad Man
If I understood you well,you are saying that all knowledge is true regarding the person who claims to have that knowledge. Given two different propositions about... (view)
Sat 19 Feb, 2005 09:13 pm - Hi Ray
I might have misjudged your character.. Your only problem was that you failed to see the philosophical importens of what I was saying.. asserting that i wasn't being philosophical..... (view)
Sat 19 Feb, 2005 01:13 am - Hi Ray
Very interresting comments.. I think i can conclude that you are an atheist... am I wrong?
[quote]What one experience is subjective, but to "know" something, reason is... (view)
Fri 18 Feb, 2005 09:42 am - Hi val
thank you for your thoughtful comments.. As for the comparison to Hume and Berkely.. I'm not so sure.
[quote]Relations are conceptual. You cannot see time or space (as... (view)
Thu 17 Feb, 2005 11:02 pm - Hi guys..
My thesis is that agnoticism is the only intellectually honest philosophy..
by agnoticism i mean:
[quote]
The doctrine that certainty about first principles or absolute truth... (view)
Mon 17 Jan, 2005 11:03 pm - Hi raheel
You said:
[quote]about the design argument- why could the watch not have been there forever. why do people always presume it was designed.
you cannot compare the universe to a watch.... (view)
Sun 16 Jan, 2005 07:33 pm - Hi everyone
consider this:
Let god=The maximally perfect being; the being of which no greater can exist; that which cannot exist continguently, the creator of all existence.
1. it is... (view)
Tue 11 Jan, 2005 07:07 pm - From a logical point of view religions are in fact no more than theories on how everything came to be, the meaning of it all, and in most cases, they also define what is right and wrong.. generally... (view)
