Mon 6 Feb, 2006 12:29 am - Re: 3 unit maths question
[quote="Mandso"]hey,
there's this year 12 question (well, actually, my sister is in year 12):
At the end of each year, a man wrote down the value of his... (view)
Sun 22 Jan, 2006 06:05 pm - into the blistering sun
shine on.
Icarus' inward battle to overcome
racing to stop time slips into oblivion
watching from beyond he recognizes now
two embed in the one: infinine... (view)
Mon 24 Oct, 2005 09:22 pm - It's similar to but easier than the chain rule's proof.
try [url=http://people.hofstra.edu/faculty/Stefan_Waner/RealWorld/proofs/chainruleproof.html]this[/url] (view)
Mon 24 Oct, 2005 02:02 pm - Re: The E x p a n d i n g Being (Paradigms)
sorry about the grammar mistakes...
[quote=BrianT]If you look at a truth table... Let P and ~P be to axioms. What I mean is that P^~P implies any... (view)
Mon 24 Oct, 2005 01:38 pm - [quote="neologist"]Your assumption that God can be identified by Cartesian coordinates is inconsistent with the nature of God whose name, Jehovah, means 'he who causes to... (view)
Mon 24 Oct, 2005 10:22 am - Re: The E x p a n d i n g Being (Paradigms)
[quote="joefromchicago"][quote="BrianT"]It may be narrow because one axiom is that their way is the only way.[/quote]
[quote]Which... (view)
Mon 24 Oct, 2005 09:42 am - I believe an extensionality for beings. That basically means that if two beings share exactly the same characteristics, then they are the same being. Twins, or even perfect copies, are unequal... (view)
Sat 22 Oct, 2005 05:33 pm - Re: The E x p a n d i n g Being (Paradigms)
[quote]You can't be serious. Fanatics have limited axioms, and their perspectives are as narrow as can be imagined. Scientists, on the other... (view)
Sat 22 Oct, 2005 04:32 pm - Indeed, I think it has happened but I have told no one until now.
Maybe _you're_ from another universe?!?! A little late, buddy. You were supposed to meet me at 9:20! (view)
