Boy, I see I'm not the only one with too much time on my hands around here, eh...
Anyhoo...
djjd62 wrote:
the easiest way for rowling to hold true to her promise (no more books) would be to kill harry
i'm still thinking he's one of the horcruxes
I heard an interesting theory, relating to the is-Harry-a-Horcrux thing, and whether he'll have to die: That he *is* a horcrux, but he won't have to die to get rid of Voldemort-- but he
will have to give up his magical abilities!
I thought that was an interesting take on it...that seems to satisfy the feeling that Harry will have to really go through some significant loss in this last one, but without him having to die. I hope she doesn't kill him! I really don't think she would-- as Keith Olberman pointed out, even though the books will be over, there are still more movies to come-- so it doesn't seem like a very smart move for her to make a whole lot of fans horribly angry by killing off her main character, does it?
Quote:i figure snape will die in some manner that restores his honour
Exactly-- and we'll have to listen to Harry raving about how he just KNOWS Snape is evil, right up until the moment Snape dies