With over 700 posts you must realize that this is an "expert knowledge forum" in marketing parlance only. There are at best a handful of people on the Science forum that have a good understanding of science; in my humble opinion. The majority of respondents are at best "cut and paste cowboys" if they are providing any actual technical information at all; to which they then add interpretations that demonstrate their total lack of understanding of what they just pasted.
Need an example: take a look at most of the responses to the: "Who intuits that 10 is closer to infinity than 5?" question. Also look at the number of times that great repository of all scientific knowledgeÂ…"Wikipedia" is referenced, then compare that to the number of peer reviewed journal articles or textbooks that are referenced and I think you will get my drift. Probably NOT the best group for advice on a grad school choice.
Since I was somewhat involved in physical chemistry in a former life I will give you a starting point. But please don't take my word for it either, after all
I could be one of those cowboys.
Here is one you may not have considered, with detailed info:
University of Illinois at Urbania-Champaign
Analytical 3rd overall
Inorganic 5th overall; second among public universities
Organic 7th overall; 2nd among public universities
Physical 7th overall; 2nd among public universities
Theoretical 10th overall; 3rd among public universities
Others you may want to look at.
Columbia
Cornell
Penn
It is often not the most noted that have good programs. William and Mary, for instance spends a very significant portion of their research grants on Environmental Chemistry, although I bet few would know that.
I don't expect this post to gain me any friends on this forum, but casual correspondence is one thing, this is too important a choice not to do REAL research on the subject. Or you COULD just look it up in Wikipedia
Hope that helps.
PS to Osco: Love the dog photo!!!