1
   

size of the sun!

 
 
tali
 
Reply Sun 25 Feb, 2007 04:00 pm
anyone got any more info on a website about the fact that, according to a tv program i watched, to reach the nearest star the fuel tank required by a space shuttle would need to be the size of the sun!
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 696 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
2PacksAday
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Feb, 2007 04:13 pm
close to a billion super tankers full of fuel to make the journey in a reasonable time. That's assuming you don't want to do anything fancy like come back. Or do it in less than nine centuries. Or see something other than the nearest star."


http://www.scq.ubc.ca/?p=208
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Feb, 2007 07:15 pm
Without knowing what ENGINE you are going to use, and what you consider a reasonable TIME, you cannot know how much fuel would be required!

You don't need very much fuel at all just to GET there, it's just a question of how fast you want to get there, and what you consider a "reasonable amount of time."

Obviously by burning more fuel, you could get more propulsion, and reduce the time it takes to get there.

There are conceptual designs for engines such as the Bussard Ramjet that wouldn't require any fuel at all, but would use matter from the interstellar medium as fuel.

Heck, we can't even rule out the possibility of faster than light travel yet...so let's not jump to conclusions about how much fuel it "would" take.
0 Replies
 
g day
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 09:56 pm
Hint - the nearest star is only 100 million miles away, you wouldn't need that much fuel.

Hint 2 - the second nearest star Alpha Promixa / Rigel Kentarus / Alpha Centurai - whatever you wish to call it - 4.5 lightyears away.

You'd want to use a solar sail (after you'd reach escape velocity for not just the Earth's gravity well - but for our Sun / Solar Systems gravity well) and/or a ionic drive system - not fossil fuel or normal rocket propellant.

With a ionic drive you use far less fuel, acceleration would be alot slower, but alot more sustainable so it'd be a alot faster and more economical in the long run!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Evolution 101 - Discussion by gungasnake
Typing Equations on a PC - Discussion by Brandon9000
The Future of Artificial Intelligence - Discussion by Brandon9000
The well known Mind vs Brain. - Discussion by crayon851
Scientists Offer Proof of 'Dark Matter' - Discussion by oralloy
Blue Saturn - Discussion by oralloy
Bald Eagle-DDT Myth Still Flying High - Discussion by gungasnake
DDT: A Weapon of Mass Survival - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » size of the sun!
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 01:02:10