1
   

Infinity?

 
 
knstech
 
Reply Fri 9 Feb, 2007 09:44 am
Is infinity a sub-unit of another number? (Example: 1 is a sub-unit of 2) :wink: Question
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 912 • Replies: 15
No top replies

 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Feb, 2007 10:18 am
I thought that "infinities" could be of different "sizes" so in that sense the "infinity of rational numbers between 1 and 2" could be thought of as a "sub-unit" of "the infinitity of positive integers". However I claim no knowledge of a rigorous definition of the term "sub-unit".
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Feb, 2007 10:31 am
What do you mean when you say that "1 is a "sub-unit of 2?" Do you mean "less than?"
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Feb, 2007 12:52 pm
infinity is not a real thing, it was made up by mathematicians as a convenience. by definition, there is no number larger than infinity. although, if a->inf and b->inf, we can still sometimes say that a > b because a goes at a faster rate than b...but when looking at inf itself, the equality operators are undefined for good reason.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Feb, 2007 03:40 pm
stuh505 wrote:
infinity is not a real thing, it was made up by mathematicians as a convenience. by definition, there is no number larger than infinity. although, if a->inf and b->inf, we can still sometimes say that a > b because a goes at a faster rate than b...but when looking at inf itself, the equality operators are undefined for good reason.

It's not a number, but I'm not sure it isn't real. Are negative numbers real? How about imaginary and complex numbers? Matrices?
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Feb, 2007 11:52 pm
Brandon,

knstech was essentially suggesting that there existed some number that we might "discover" that infinity was smaller than. I was trying to explain that, since we dont "discover" numbers but rather define them to be what we want, and since we have defined infinity such that there is no larger number, there is no chance of what he suggested being true.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Feb, 2007 12:47 am
stuh505 wrote:
infinity is not a real thing,
It is in the sense of a non-random repeating number such as 1.666......

This can, for all intents and purposes, be rounded up..... like little doogies.

Git along little doogies!
0 Replies
 
Heliotrope
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Feb, 2007 05:19 am
Re: Infinity?
knstech wrote:
Is infinity a sub-unit of another number? (Example: 1 is a sub-unit of 2) :wink: Question


Defne what you mean by you use of the word infinity.
0 Replies
 
g day
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Feb, 2007 04:01 pm
Noun 1. subunit - a monetary unit that is valued at a fraction (usually one hundredth) of the basic monetary unit

What definition of sub-unit are you using?

Infinity is a concept of an un-ending number - not a number in itself. It can not generally be used in nummerical calculations with numbers in a field. It can be used in limit theory, differential calculus or non eucledian geometry - to name a few applicable fields of legitimate mathematical use. Within these fields (especially limits) it can be "sized" (a small inifinity, a exponential infinity etc - generally determined as the relative growth rate of series that heads out starting from zero with no limit). So the sum of all positive numbers may be classed a "small, linear" inifinity (considered as branching out from zero), whilst the sum of the factorials of all positive integers (by relative comparision) is a rather large, exponential infinity.

General rule for maths below 2nd year Uni - don't mix numbers and infinities unless doing limit theory or doing the curls of vector forces around an anomaly in a 3d space...
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Feb, 2007 04:12 pm
Brandon9000 wrote:
stuh505 wrote:
infinity is not a real thing, it was made up by mathematicians as a convenience. by definition, there is no number larger than infinity. although, if a->inf and b->inf, we can still sometimes say that a > b because a goes at a faster rate than b...but when looking at inf itself, the equality operators are undefined for good reason.

It's not a number, but I'm not sure it isn't real. Are negative numbers real?


Of course negative numbers are "real". Consider this example:

There are 5 people in a room. Seven people leave. How many people have to enter the room for it to be empty?
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Feb, 2007 06:16 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
Of course negative numbers are "real". Consider this example:

There are 5 people in a room. Seven people leave. How many people have to enter the room for it to be empty?


The word "entering" means coming INTO the room. No amount of things can be put INTO the room to make it empty.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Feb, 2007 08:16 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
stuh505 wrote:
infinity is not a real thing, it was made up by mathematicians as a convenience. by definition, there is no number larger than infinity. although, if a->inf and b->inf, we can still sometimes say that a > b because a goes at a faster rate than b...but when looking at inf itself, the equality operators are undefined for good reason.

It's not a number, but I'm not sure it isn't real. Are negative numbers real?


Of course negative numbers are "real". Consider this example:

There are 5 people in a room. Seven people leave. How many people have to enter the room for it to be empty?

I know. My point was to suggest to him that infinity, and many other things besides the natural numbers are real, not to actually suggest that negative numbers are not.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Feb, 2007 08:36 pm
Stuh,

Thats the point (which is somewhat amusing to me at least).

This problem has a perfectly correct mathematical solution; 5 - 7 = -2 people are in the room after the first part of the problem

Obviously, an empty room has zero people -- so to get an empty room requires +2 people which is also a perfectly fine solution.

But is raises the question-- is -2 people a "real" number of people to have in a room?

If this doesn't amuse you, just let it go.
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Feb, 2007 02:01 am
In the absence of a a definition of the term "sub-unit", surely all we can say is that "real" in mathematics is a technical term which distinguishes the "real numbers" (horizontal number line) from the "imaginary numbers" (vertical number line). and in this technical sense a negative integer is "real".

However this is not a concept of "reality" which can be extended to "infinity" or "infinities". Here we are dealng with philosophical and operational notions about the process of "counting". There is an interesting book called "Infinity and the Mind" by Rucker which goes into these concepts in depth.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Feb, 2007 07:34 pm
Hi-yah fresco,

I (finally) responded to your post about Spinoza's proposed proof that god doesn't exist as per Session 5 Speaker 2!

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=90688&start=610
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Feb, 2007 02:36 am
Thanks....have responded thereto.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Evolution 101 - Discussion by gungasnake
Typing Equations on a PC - Discussion by Brandon9000
The Future of Artificial Intelligence - Discussion by Brandon9000
The well known Mind vs Brain. - Discussion by crayon851
Scientists Offer Proof of 'Dark Matter' - Discussion by oralloy
Blue Saturn - Discussion by oralloy
Bald Eagle-DDT Myth Still Flying High - Discussion by gungasnake
DDT: A Weapon of Mass Survival - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Infinity?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 09/30/2024 at 04:18:50