1
   

To the moon on 60 litres of 'fuel'.

 
 
Reply Mon 4 Sep, 2006 07:51 am
100 million Euros is not much for a successful research mission to the moon, compared to the incredible cost of NASA.
.....................................
Smart 1 was launched in September 2003 as a technology demonstrator.
.
It became Europe's first space science mission to use an ion engine instead of chemical combustion to reach its destination.
.
The system draws power through the probe's solar wings and then uses this energy to propel the spacecraft forward by expelling charged particles of xenon. It was highly efficient, covering 100 million km in a series of looping orbits and using just 60 litres of "fuel".
.
"That's remarkable when you think about it - it's the same volume of fuel as you'd put in the tank of a car; and we went all that way," said Smart 1 scientist Professor Manuel Grande of the University of Wales, Aberystwyth.
.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/5306204.stm
.
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2005-09-27-nasa-griffin-interview_x.htm
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 737 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
joshuakid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Sep, 2006 01:00 am
haha 100 million $ compared with 60 litres of fuel... crazy stuff
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Evolution 101 - Discussion by gungasnake
Typing Equations on a PC - Discussion by Brandon9000
The Future of Artificial Intelligence - Discussion by Brandon9000
The well known Mind vs Brain. - Discussion by crayon851
Scientists Offer Proof of 'Dark Matter' - Discussion by oralloy
Blue Saturn - Discussion by oralloy
Bald Eagle-DDT Myth Still Flying High - Discussion by gungasnake
DDT: A Weapon of Mass Survival - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » To the moon on 60 litres of 'fuel'.
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/29/2024 at 02:20:23