Reply
Thu 18 May, 2006 07:11 am
I understand that some scientists have pulished a work in NATURE about a hypothesis that human and chimps interbreed,possibly creating a `hybrid' infertile third species, this interbreeding would explain why chimp and human X chrosomone are similiar.
Probably not infertile. This was a featured article in today's Washington Post. I no longer have the URL but posted it on Trivia and Games, Wildclicker Jeopardy thread.
For the record, let me just say that I for one have NEVER found a chimpanzee attractive in the slightest!
I had a Chimpnzelle grope me once, but that's as far as it went.
Is that a cross between a chimp and a gazelle?
BS, you were drunk, right? You didn't realize what you were doing?
Lions and tigers are different species that can produce sterile offspring if interbred.
The Chimpnzelle is a furry deer
I knew one called Alana
She'd make a nest in a tree, I hear
And only eat banana.
I happened upon this post
Monkey men creationQuote:Well, one way would be to use IUI (intrauterine insemination) protocols, this would get around the problem that one biologist remarked as "Human/Simian anti-body incompatibilities". IUI procedures would involve the use of SEMEN processing techniques to remove all semen elements except the sperm themselves, this is a relatively simple procedure that is used all the time with both human and farm animal artificial insemination. It requires the collected semen to be mixed with at least twice as much isotonic saline (.9% saline) in a centrifuge tube, and after thorough mixing, then centrifuged at about 50 G's for 5 minutes or so, the sperm settle to the bottom as a small pellet, the semen can be drawn off and disposed of, and more saline can be added, mixed and centrifuged again to remove any further semen elements other than the sperm, this would eliminate the prostragalins (must be removed for IUI otherwise bad things happen) and stray white blood cells, and other debris. Some animals and people due to a genetic defect produce so many viscous agents that simple saline doesn't work, so you add a small amount of PAPAIN enzyme (stuff in papaya fruit that tears up your mouth, and tenderizes steaks) when mixing with the saline, then centrifuge. Finally the sperm pellet is mixed with; isotonic saline, 10% skim milk (protein), dextrose (fuel source), and glycerol (cryoprotectant) and slowly cooled, then frozen for storage. IUI is simply thawing the sperm/extender, warming to body temp, and directly injecting through a 2mm O.D. polyethylene tube directly through the cervix, and into the uterus.
Problem: How do you obtain Chimpanzee or Gorilla semen? You ever try calling the local Zoo about this, I've heard stories from legitimate researchers with labs having nothing to do with crossbreeding, they get laughed at allot.
Could this work? Most likely yes, in the late eighties researches with human eggs and chimpanzee semen running two different lines of research decided to try it one day in a petri dish, the semen was purified and centrifuges, and exposed to the eggs, the egg began to multiply, after 16 cells, they destroyed it to avoid moral backlash.
Would it work inside a female human or chimp or gorilla? Should, barring any unforeseen compatibility issues, if it doesn't then petri dish fertilization could be done, then the dividing egg would be implanted.
Has it been tried before? Maybe, Russian artificial insemination researchers supposedly tried it in Siberia, and later sought funding to experiment in Africa, and South America to avoid social backlash in Russia from the people. Supposedly a Chinese research in the 70's tried it with his sperm and a female gorilla, but the offspring was destroyed by the RED GUARD, and he was imprisoned for crimes against nature, and also an Italian researcher supposedly had a lab where he did such experiments including chimp/gorilla hybrids that were later used in human/chimp/gorilla hybrid experiments.
Chumly wrote:
Could this work? Most likely yes, in the late eighties researches with human eggs and chimpanzee semen running two different lines of research decided to try it one day in a petri dish, the semen was purified and centrifuges, and exposed to the eggs, the egg began to multiply, after 16 cells, they destroyed it to avoid moral backlash.
Would it work inside a female human or chimp or gorilla? Should, barring any unforeseen compatibility issues, if it doesn't then petri dish fertilization could be done, then the dividing egg would be implanted.
Has it been tried before? Maybe, Russian artificial insemination researchers supposedly tried it in Siberia, and later sought funding to experiment in Africa, and South America to avoid social backlash in Russia from the people. Supposedly a Chinese research in the 70's tried it with his sperm and a female gorilla, but the offspring was destroyed by the RED GUARD, and he was imprisoned for crimes against nature, and also an Italian researcher supposedly had a lab where he did such experiments including chimp/gorilla hybrids that were later used in human/chimp/gorilla hybrid experiments.
lot of *supposedly*s and *maybe*s there. i think this is b*s* to use a word i rarely bandy about. since *modern* humans & chimps don't have the same number of chromosomes, i seriously doubt any crossbreeding is possible.
chumly, thanks for the link; i stand corrected. since donkeys & horses have different chromosome count yet produce mules, human-chimp breeding wouldn't be inherently impossible, and given the genome similarity, it might even be probable, but i hope we never find out.
I think the part about the misbegotten Marxist view of evolution is kind'a creepy!
Quote:The young Soviet Union, in its effort to stamp out religion, was determined to prove that men were descended from apes. In 1926, a Soviet scientist named Ilya Ivanov decided the most compelling way to do this would be to breed a humanzee: a human-chimpanzee hybrid. Ivanov set off for a French research station in West Africa. There he inseminated three female chimpanzees with human sperm. Not his own, for he shared the colonial-era belief that the local people were more closely related to apes than he was. He stayed long enough to learn that his experiment had failed.
Next Ivanov wrote a Cuban heiress, Rosalia Abreu. Abreu was the first person to breed chimps in captivity and had a large menagerie outside Havana. Ivanov asked if any of her male chimpanzees might be available to inseminate a Russian volunteer known to posterity only as 'G."
So why would Ilya Ivanov think this would prove evolution (and even worse, disprove God)? It has to do with the nature of Marxist dialectic. Marx was, like Darwin, a philosopher of change, but the basis for change he used wasn't the undirected and tree-like change of evolution; rather it was the progressive and linear change taken by Hegel from Christian providentialism. For Marx and his followers, there was a necessary sequence that had to be followed by historical necessity. For Darwin, there simply wasn't. But in Stalin's Russia, biology was subordinate to political theory, and so evolution had to occur in the same manner as the predicted (and already falsified even then!) evolution of human society.
So hybridising a chimp and human would show that the dialectic of history had formed humans from prior apes. And this view of history, in which apes like chimps are less evolved than humans, is linear, progressive and much more like Lamarck's view of evolution than Darwin's, in which humans and chimps represent independent branches of the evolutionary tree, and in which neither is more evolved than the other except with respect to some particular traits.
http://evolvethought.blogspot.com/2005/12/kong-love-interest.html
to be accurate, the SU was determined to stamp out religion *except* the secular religion of Marxism.
Karl Marx or the State or the scientists would be the spiritual leaders?
Chumly wrote:Karl Marx or the State or the scientists would be the spiritual leaders?
the party would be the priesthood, and the state, the church, but being secular, no God. Marx would be akin to a prophet, i suppose. there's even a worker's paradise in the offing for the masses.
Found the link to the article in today's paper.
Source at Washington Post
HUMANITY'S ORIGINS SEEM MURKIER AND MURKIER.
A story from colonial days.
A European enquired of an Abyssinian kaffir why the monkeys did not speak.
He was informed by the kaffir that it was because they were frightened that if they spoke the Europeans would put them to work.
In Arthur C. Clarke's Rama, simps are super chimps, genetically enhanced simians that weigh less than 30kg, consume half the oxygen and food needed by a human, but can do the job of 2.75 men in domestic affairs, elementary cooking, tool transportation and a dozen other routine tasks.