Quote:Fine, you were dead wrong. You were wrong to think I was talking about whether your opinion is popular among blacks and continue to be wrong now.
OMG!!!!!!!
Now your game is to lie and obfuscate and suggest you didn't say what you said and didn't mean what you did.
BTW, it doesn't matter whether you are black or white. Given your opinion is at odds with BLACKS THAT FAVOR REPARATIONS, black or white, for those blacks your opinion is of no consquence and is irrelevant - a non factor.
As for the absolute relevance of your opinion vs. my opinion on that topic.... hmmm.....
Well, if I'm one of those 67% or so... then I do factor in and in that sense what I think is obviously relevant. There would be no 67% if I was not apart of it. And back to my reference about other msg board and opinions I've shared on the issue... my thoughts have been ostenibly "relevant" to those who felt I articulated the issue well whereas those who shared your opposition using similar terms that you have, their thoughts were "irrelevant", perhaps because they (like you do here so often) couldn't articulate their position as well as I could. I dunno <*shug*>
Now to your game of dishonesty:
Quote:Again, you do not represent blacks, that's just your inordinate sense of entitlement speaking.
Like I said, you are in no way a representative of blacks and thank goodness for that.
Frankly you do not speak for all blacks.
---------------------------------------------------
ADD ON:
African Americans are not a flock of sheep.
Many of them would see my goals as an improvement.
Some of the more ethnocentric militant types might not but they don't speak for blacks. No matter how much they try to hijack black issues they are just one voice like all of us.
----------------------------------------------------
Yeah! I can really see how that suggest that you were not trying to say my views were "
unpopular"...
(as opposed to yours)
I guess that's why you were confused and thought I - like you - was trying to claiming my view was more "relevant" than yours... you know... like PROJECTING! (your mentality onto me).... Such a sad affair.
Quote:By the way, you can get "reparations" when you are discrminated against. Just file a law suit.
Okay Craven The Assumed Black/White/Polka Dot Man!
I'm sure that doesn't at all reflects your nationality.
And talk about assumptions... "wild" assumptions.... (well actually BS assumptions) Yours there is that my position regarding reparations is personally motivated as if my belief in it is based on "What's In It For Me!" You need to cut your ties with Alice. She has your mind twisted!
(That was what the whole ideology and intelligence thing was about...)
Quote:"you all are simply defenders of white supremacy"
I won't quibble about whether that completely satisfies the "entire forum" doctrine, considering that the context could have been logically related to ALL those who were engaged in the debate. Nor will I say that I took your "entire" doctrine to mean a blanket statement that says any and every one who is a member here and participates in any of the forums... whether Politics, Philosophy or whatever. And I definitely won't show any concern for the specific time frame and, again, those who were actively participating/exchanging in the debate with him at the time....
Quote:Okay... feel free to site the post that said ALL, EACH, EVERY - aka this ENTIRE - forum = white supremacist. I await you evidentiary post. - NHLH
All I asked you for was proof of your assertion! not a debate about whether it was true or not. So if it makes you feel good YOU WERE RIGHT.... Noah did use the word ALL.... whether he indicted the whole, entire forum as you said is very possibly an exaggeration. That is, if we are sticklers over words.
So, I'll grant you that unequivocally! You were right on that!
We won't mention the issues you have with the WS definition thingy and how perhaps that is relevant here.... You were right Craven! You can do it! Yes you can read (and identify the word ALL, A-L-L) Good!!! Craven!!!
-----------------------------------------------------------
ADD-ON EDIT:
Noticed I never said you were "wrong" or "dead wrong" over that issue. I just ask you substantiate your claims. BTW, in the absence of evidence, that's what any assertion is, just a claim. So if you think someone asking you for evidence is tantamount to calling you wrong, then you do have a serious problem with your self-concept and.... ah... "conflation".
Providing proof even before being asked for it should always be the "high" standard of debate. That's the kind of "decorum" or rather mode of debate I can respect and seems to be something you pretended to be within your criteria....
--------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:Yes, I can point it out [where Noah said the "entire" forum were WS.] But a better question is whether I will. And relevant to that question is that Noah is of far less interest to me than I think he is to you (e.g. you emulate him, I don't). I don't feel like reading through his posts at the moment and don't much care to maintain a high intellectual standard of debate about Noah so I don't plan to.
Hmmmm......
I guess at some point you felt better.... (but it was not because I made a big point about it)
Now, tell me what's the problem with you mannin'-up?
Quote:The Noahs do not speak for African-Americans. They seem to think they do but do not. Frankly as a black man I am frequently disgusted by the desire of some loudmouths to try to annoint themselves as leaders.
How about mannin' up on the reparations issue?
Now tell who "speaks for African-Americans" on that issue?
The Noah's or the Craven's?
Oh! And I'm definitely am waiting for you to lay out the basis for this "Loudmouth self-appointed, self-annointed leadership" bit. Can you illustrate how I have done so and what your earlier statement meant in that context.... (There's that word again!!)
"you are in no way a representative of blacks and thank goodness for that."
Why don't you tell me how "representative" I am on the reparations issue again Craven?
Thank goodness its only some 67% that think like me!
Quote:You've been speaking to me at length, you have also consulted what I think.
You have some type of hearing/reading block that filters out CONTEXT??
I have not consulted your views or advise on reparations....
Black/White/Polka Dot you, Mr. "I have common ground with black people", (hmmm.... ) or rather your thoughts on the issue are irrelevant and you likewise are in NO way a representative of blacks.... Thank Gooooooodness for that!
(Now can you tell what "blacks" you're talking about in your statements. All blacks, some blacks, tall blacks, fats blacks or just blacks that think like you? And what or why are you thankful?)