Re: Cheapest Decent Digital Camera
Tomkitten wrote:Does anyone know why the black Sony Cybershot DSC W-7 is consistently more expensive than the metallic one?
Thats sorta a holdover from film-camera tradition; the black models were/are considered the "Pro" version, and for that, command a bit of a premium. The thinking has always sorta been that the black models were somewhat less conspicuous, though (even while mosta my film cam stuff is black
); whatever color it is, hundreds if not thousands of dollars worth of glass and metal hanging from one's face is just plain not at all compatible with the concept of "inconspicuous", if you ask me
Sidebar: A sorta "working credentials" thing involves a black, pro-model camera body showing lostsa dents and nicks, with plenty of black worn down to brass or even to the underlying aluminum, magnesium, or steel of the base body frame. Often, the camera's brandname will be taped over with blacktape, or even be painted out.
One thing I noticed years ago; if you're wearing a few beat-up pro-level cameras off both shoulders and down your front on a complicated black webbing harness rig (say, 5 or 6 or so, all with different lenses - and mounted motor drives help, too) , with a large, suitably beat-up, stuffed-full camera accessory bag slung slightly behind and off one hip, nobody ever questions your authority to go anywhere or photograph anything. Oh, yeah - another good touch is to rubber-band a buncha rolls of film, outta their canisters, with the leader tongue wrapped around the film can - stick 'em all up and down the web harness from which dangle the cameras. A well-worn fly-fishing vest, or trap-shooting vest, festooned with travel and event patches, pockets stuffed fulla filters and the like is good, too.