0
   

SONY Cyber-shot vs Panasonic

 
 
Reply Wed 28 Dec, 2005 11:19 am
I'm still researching digital cameras, and have (probably) narrowed the choice down to the SONY CYBER-SHOT DSC-W5 and the PANASONIC LUMIX DMC-LZ2.

The features that appeal to me specifically are low-light photography and simplicity of use. The SONY appears to be particularly good with the first - "Low-light shots are a specialty; the flash even throttles back intelligently to avoid nuking your subject".

The same review summary says of the Panasonic,"The photos range from very good to excellent. Manual controls are scant...the Lumix is strictly point-and-shoot. But if simplicity is the name of your game, you'll love the physical toggle on-off switch that you don't have to hold down for several seconds, as on most cameras."

A third option might be the FUJIFILM FINEPIX F10; it's more expensive, but the same review says "its low-light work is jaw-dropping; even candlelight photos are entirely grain-free."

I am not too handy with even the simplest cameras - maybe one level up from a box Brownie? but I need photos that I can use as a basis for paintings. My work is heavily oriented toward still-lifes which means good closeup functionality is helpful and low-light capability a must. Also, I need to be able to photograph the finished work decently, without all kinds of space/time/money consuming spotlights, etc.

Reading this over, I think I may have eliminated the Panasonic, but I'm not totally sure.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 687 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Dec, 2005 11:27 am
http://reviews.cnet.com/Sony_Cyber_Shot_DSC_W5/4505-6501_7-31292846.html

http://reviews.cnet.com/Panasonic_Lumix_DMC_LZ2K/4505-6501_7-31289094.html

http://reviews.cnet.com/Sony_Cyber_Shot_DSC_W7/4505-6501_7-31292847.html

Here are some reviews from C Net. I bought the W5 last summer, and I love it. The W7 came out a little later. Basically it is the same camera, but has 7 megapixels instead of five. A few months after I got my W5, my husband got the W7, for practically the same price that I paid.

I like C Net's reviews because you can see the reviews from both the standpoint of a professional reviewer, and consumers.


Here's the review of the Finepix:
http://reviews.cnet.com/Fujifilm_FinePix_F10/4505-6501_7-31289404.html
0 Replies
 
Tomkitten
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Dec, 2005 11:57 am
thanks, Phoenix. Now I have a question for you - have you any opinion on these three when shooting in low0light situations?
0 Replies
 
butibum
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 11:48 am
Have you also had a look at
http://www.steves-digicams.com/cameras_dig5.html
and
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/

I read a lot of these reviews before I bought my W12 (black W1) early in 2005.

regards
Martin
0 Replies
 
kermit
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 04:34 pm
I can offer you two perspectives: I am an avid amateur photographer and a good friend of mine an artist who painted from digital photos and took pictures of his finished works.

First, I've worked with both Sony and Panasonic products in digital forms. From my experience, I would recommend Panasonic over Sony, especially if you are thinking about user friendliness of the product as well as the quality of your pictures. In general, Panasonic cameras have the Leica lens that just cannot be beat, even with the Carl Zeiss on Sony. The color depth and accuracy is far more natural. In terms of specifics, I have used Sony Cyber Shot DSC-T1, which is a different type of camera than what you are looking at, as well as Panasonic DMC-LC40, DMC-FX7, and finally, LZ2, which is one of your options. LZ2 is in a class of its own because it has a 6x zoom for its medium body, unlike other point-and-shoot cameras. I found that the zoom, however, was not as reliable as I expected, even with the Image Stabilization system. LZ2 performed decently in low light situations (natural).

As for my friend, he worked with Nikon Coolpix 800 (really old swivel design - don't think they make it anymore) and really liked it. One of the things he appreciated was not only its low light performance, but the swivel design itself that made it much easier to hold it steadily (unless you plan on using a tripod). He was looking into getting a new Pentax (can't remember which model) that also had a swivel design. He took photos of subjects with the Nikon and also took photos of his paintings and submitted those images to competitions, successfully.

Currently, I am using a Casio Exilim EX-Z110, which is a good compact camera but not sure if this would be good for your purpose. I traded in my Panasonic LZ2 for this because I wasn't impressed enough with the 6x zoom enough and preferred to have a more compact one. This does not mean, however, I don't like the Panasonic because the images are still far more superior for artistic purposes (I still have my LC40).

Hope this is helpful!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Recording Detector - Question by gollum
Bad picture on my Sharp LCD TV - Question by hydroplant
LCD TV. Help! - Question by kolinos4
p3 or 360 and why - Question by XxGWOPBOYZxX
Post your latest gizmos - Discussion by Chumly
IPOD OR ZUNE HD? - Discussion by detroittou
Giving up my iPod for a Walkman - Discussion by djjd62
Digital audio in your home sound system - Question by hingehead
 
  1. Forums
  2. » SONY Cyber-shot vs Panasonic
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.51 seconds on 05/11/2024 at 03:33:19