Disagreeing, just to get a rise out of someone

Lash wrote:

Is Francis doing that on purpose?

If so, ....that's pretty good.

If not, my sincere condoloscences.

I'll teach you how to spell properly..

0 Replies

Hmmmmmm....

0 Replies

Somebody or other, I mention no names and I point no accusing finger, wrote, "Hmmmmmm...." Shocked

I ask you, what is the purpose and objective for that undefined comment?

In short my friends; Is it logical? Are we talking about implied Boolean logic which is used to represent Boolean logical operators, as the space between keywords defaults to either OR logic or AND logic. I would respectfully suggest the former as Boolean logic has become so common that it may be considered a de facto standard.

0 Replies

How very disagreeable to be obliged to deal with such twaddle at this hour of a Sattiday morning . . .

0 Replies

No,.... not Boolean. dlowan is merely careful and cautious, not doubly commutative.

Off to the East Coast where the weather forecast is good, I'm glad to discover. (I wish you all a very good - but moderately disagreeable - day.)

0 Replies

Tryagain wrote:

Somebody or other, I mention no names and I point no accusing finger, wrote, “Hmmmmmm....”

I ask you, what is the purpose and objective for that undefined comment?

In short my friends; Is it logical? Are we talking about implied Boolean logic which is used to represent Boolean logical operators, as the space between keywords defaults to either OR logic or AND logic. I would respectfully suggest the former as Boolean logic has become so common that it may be considered a de facto standard.

What twaddle.

I was merely expressing perfectly reasoned and reasonable scepticism.

0 Replies

dlowan wrote:

I was merely expressing perfectly reasoned and reasonable scepticism.

Your foundation to do so is perfectly nonexistent but your knowledge is more than perfectible...

0 Replies

My foundation is the stunningly variable nature of Francis' spelling, which is manifestly existent.

0 Replies

Some might even say egregiously so.

0 Replies

dlowan wrote:

My foundation is the stunningly variable nature of Francis' spelling, which is manifestly existent.

In order to edify those who have such beliefs, I would say it depends on the interest I have to the comment..

0 Replies

Your vesperal behavior is very disingenuous, Deb.

0 Replies

Your language is absolutely incomprehensible.

0 Replies

I hope so, I do the same with my compatriots...

0 Replies

Why?

0 Replies

"The heart has its reasons which reason knows nothing of"

0 Replies

what a load of fermented bulldust francis. You are as eloquent as tits on a bull.

0 Replies

I'm very glad you noticed such, dadpad.

But in order to get a rise out of me, you have to do so much better, in which, obviously, you are not equiped to succeed...

0 Replies

No matter how disagreeable it maybe, I am forced to concede that the statement of Set, "How very disagreeable to be obliged to deal with such twaddle at this hour of a Sattiday morning . . ."
Is overwhelmingly correct.

The order of Georges words, only mildly irritating. Francis unyielding dedication to the entente cordiale, Deb's, well need I say more?

However, that was before the arrival of that collector of witticisms and defender of the Victorian way of life, who would not touch a dingo with yours... I of cause refer to Dadpad

So, listen up mate! You are as welcome here as a pom at a beach barbie.

0 Replies

Francis wrote:

"The heart has its reasons which reason knows nothing of"

I agree that you know nothing of reason, but had not, before, guessed at a heart.

0 Replies

How very disingenuous of you . . . you certainly do believe he possesses a heart, and that is the target of your silly barbs . . . how very predictably lapine of you . . .

0 Replies

Disagreeing, just to get a rise out of someone

Quick Links

My Account

able2know