1
   

Disagreeing, just to get a rise out of someone

Forums:
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Tryagain
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 04:24 pm
This sugar coated, honey covered bubblegum rhetoric cannot be allowed to stand. This thread has been hijacked by; tree hugging bible thumping hippy Liberal wimps.

Apart from the juxtaposition of two Brits for light relief, I lament the demise of the accepted protocol under the rules of engagement. I name no names but you know who you are.


"why is everyone stalking me?"

Worry not dude, it's only the waiter trying to take your order. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 04:26 pm
dyslexia wrote:
rabbits don't have synapses, they have fluff.


Your hat is made from rabbit fluff.


It's almost enough to make you think, isn't it?
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 04:28 pm
Tryagain wrote:
Apart from the juxtaposition of two Brits for light relief...
I for one, but maybe not one of the ones, have never juxtaposed or inclined to be juxtaposed in my life.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 04:28 pm
dlowan wrote:
dyslexia wrote:
rabbits don't have synapses, they have fluff.


Your hat is made from rabbit fluff.


It's almost enough to make you think, isn't it?

a measurable degree of beaver, my dear. The quality of a Stetson is measured by the amount of beaver in the felt.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 04:33 pm
Oh for Dog's sake, why are we feeling beavers ? ! ? ! ? You peoples is more ridiculouser than i never have seen afore . . .
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 04:33 pm
SETI is a poopity head.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 04:35 pm
Did you say fever in the belt?


My ears are spinning from Fox's weirdness in the homophobia thread, and I cannot hear correctly.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 04:36 pm
Tryagain wrote:
This sugar coated, honey covered bubblegum rhetoric cannot be allowed to stand. This thread has been hijacked by; tree hugging bible thumping hippy Liberal wimps.

Apart from the juxtaposition of two Brits for light relief, I lament the demise of the accepted protocol under the rules of engagement. I name no names but you know who you are.


“why is everyone stalking me?”

Worry not dude, it’s only the waiter trying to take your order. Rolling Eyes





Z.

Try trying again, Tryagain.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 04:36 pm
You never could hear correctly, nor much less unnerstan . . . Fox er no Fox . . .
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 04:40 pm
back to hats please. Did you know Stockport County Football Club are called the Hatters?

And why they went mad?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 04:41 pm
Yes. Like Luton Town.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 04:46 pm
Pretentious lot in Luton. The Hatters are from Stockport, centre of UK Hat Trade. Not to be confused with rough trade or beavers. You trying to keep a disagreement going or something Smile
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 04:48 pm
I just disagree that County plays football - they kick around, that's it.

Cheers!

http://www.dustymiller-wrenbury.com/images/hattersmod.gif
0 Replies
 
Tryagain
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 04:50 pm
"Try trying again, Tryagain."

Your verbosity is exceeded only by your beauty!
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 04:57 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
I just disagree that County plays football - they kick around, that's it.

Cheers!

http://www.dustymiller-wrenbury.com/images/hattersmod.gif


Smile waddya mean dont play football? THEY TRY.

In fact Sale RUFC who now play at Edgeley Park make a try quite often.
0 Replies
 
Tryagain
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2006 06:15 am
Liberals lose in Canada - we now march south!


(Edited) $hit - now it's me.

A little help here!!!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2006 06:17 am
What, help the helpless?


Nah.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2006 06:22 am
Oh, that is nominative after the verb to be, you know.....

"****.

Now it's I"


Just being helpful......

























teehee
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2006 06:25 am
Don't you mean "I", instead of I" ?



HA HAA!





<unless you're including the rude word, of course>
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2006 06:30 am
No.
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Disagreeing, just to get a rise out of someone
  3. » Page 23
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 08:54:12
▲ ▼