1
   

Doing a Ratzenhofer/The A2K Typo Hall of Shame

 
 
AngeliqueEast
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 12:44 pm
parados wrote:
Better yet... put egg on they're face..


Not on my face Evil or Very Mad But I will take an egg shampoo Very Happy
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 12:53 pm
parados wrote:
Better yet... put egg on they're face..


Ratzenhofer!!!

Misuse of the word "they're"!
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 12:55 pm
kickycan wrote:
parados wrote:
Better yet... put egg on they're face..


Ratzenhofer!!!

Misuse of the word "they're"!

hehe, You missed it. I already caught it HERE.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 12:55 pm
parados wrote:
Whats' with the simple calling of names? If someone misuses puncuation or misspells a word. It calls for measueres that meet the crime. . We don't need these mambypamby calling them Gus ideas. Cut off there fingers.


Ratzenhofer!!!
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 12:56 pm
Reyn wrote:
kickycan wrote:
parados wrote:
Better yet... put egg on they're face..


Ratzenhofer!!!

Misuse of the word "they're"!

hehe, You missed it. I already caught it HERE.


Yes, but I wanted to throw in another highly derisive "Ratzenhofer" for good measure.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 12:57 pm
And now it's time to branch out to other threads and try to find a good ratzenhofer or two. I'll be back.
0 Replies
 
AngeliqueEast
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 01:00 pm
Oh no, the ratzenhofer crier is on a rampage!
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 01:03 pm
Er, I think parados was writing a parody...
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 01:05 pm
Well, that's okay, it was good practice.

Ha! I got my first outside Ratzenhofer!

kickycan wrote:
Mortkat wrote:
And just what is that under your avatar's arm, ElBeth? deodorant in a futile attempt to mask your stink?


Ratzenhofer!!!


http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1679196#1679196
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 01:33 pm
How about this one?

kickycan wrote:
You're right, Piffka! And not one word of explanation as of yet! Doesn't Gus realize that his unapologetic and cavalier attitude towards the proper rendering of the titles of threads is a direct reflection not only on himself, but on the entire community of A2K! This will not--CAN NOT--stand! I demand that Gus proffer a properly-worded apology and correction immediately!


Cannot is all one word, with no space between can and not!

Ratzenhofer!!!
0 Replies
 
AngeliqueEast
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 01:35 pm
Ha!
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 01:37 pm
it is?
0 Replies
 
mckenzie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 01:51 pm
From Oxford Dictionaries, AskOxford.com

"Both cannot and can not are acceptable spellings, but the first is much more usual. You would use can not when the 'not' forms part of another construction such as 'not only'."
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 01:55 pm
Lots of Ratzenhofers around.

Look at this thread title:

Friends with benifits.
0 Replies
 
mckenzie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 01:57 pm
Back to the first post on this thread:

Quote:
This is midly repellant and offensive in itself, but it is compounded by that period just hanging there at the end of a phrase that can in no way be construed as a full sentence, by any sane person.
0 Replies
 
AngeliqueEast
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 01:59 pm
Everyone has Ratzenhoferd at one time or another. *giggles*
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 02:03 pm
Harrumph. I don't like 'cannot'; to me it takes emphasis away from 'not'.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 02:27 pm
I believe I have found one.

This one is filled with misspellings...

Gus wrote:
Kickycan is a fine fellow and I would enjoy having a glass of wine with him


The corrected sentence would read as follows...

Gus wrote:
Kickycan is a miserable piece of excrement and I need to scrap him off my shoe.


I'm gonna go see if I can find any more.
0 Replies
 
AngeliqueEast
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 02:31 pm
LOL
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 05:16 pm
HOW did Kicky's "aggregious" get corrected?


I notice his "midly" for "mildly" wasn't.


I HATE the new non edit thing.


But anyhoo, leave Gus alone, Kicky!


I love you both, you are the men of my dreams.....I can't bear to see you tear each other apart like this!!!!!
0 Replies
 
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/02/2024 at 10:30:32