I have my objections to this....
Quote:1. they might have the scientific counter-proof.
But all those counterproofs talk about is "for last 6 million years the Y chromosome has not disintegrated so it has assumed to reach its minimum size and has lost power of further disintegration " But what about before 6 million years back where it HAD disintegrated!
Also there no reason to NOT to assume that Y will not disappear. It had happened with oldest living fossils most of them reptiles and amphibians like frogs, salamanders and some lizards species who had lost Y.
So that ONE DAY i wrote about will not be in near future but certainly in distant future though .....
Quote:2. Mating wouldn't be affected:
. . . . (XX) (XY)
(XX) (XY) (XX) (XY)
. . . . (XX) (X -)
(XX) (X -) (XX) (X -)
Agree there! I misunderstood.
Quote:3. parthenogenesis, not cloning
Vaguely they are same. Parthenogenesis is seen as a possible legal way to clone primates including humans.