Deb,
What IS your point? I ask because i did not see anything resembling one and your posts usually don't have that result.
cobalt wrote:
There are a number of Net resources besides Google that will return similar findings, but generally not to the extent and ease that Google does. For instance, telephone number redirectors only allow the reverse search through the phone number. National phone directories may publish those with listed phone numbers.
False. I would provide links but don't want to give more targets for frivolous complaint.
cobalt wrote:
Folks that are most protective of privacy will go to great lengths to see that is maintained, only to find the resources online that will destroy their sanctuary. And, the burden shall be on THEM to search out each resource just to remove their name?
Only people who DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to act on their privacy concerns will be listed. Are folks that are "protective of their privacy" people who knowingly allow their information to be published and then complain when one particular enity links to the data?
Anyone who cares about their privacy has an unlisted number, anyone who has an unlisted number is also not listed in Google.
Anyone who wants to publically list their info locally but not in Google can do so as well.
In short you have absolute control of your privacy in this case.
cobalt wrote:
Perhaps I'd be happier if Google would put a notice on it's site home page where the usual searches are entered.
I'd be happier if Google would place links on their home page to my online businesses. But for some reason they think that they can't comply with requests to alter their home page (sparese for a reason) and consider this unreasonable.
cobalt wrote:
Again, I don't know why posters feel I am just out to "blame" Google - it really is a broader topic, as williamhenry writes.
The privacy paranoias are often well placed and ill directed. The broader issue is a reasonable concern, the unfounded complaints do little to help the overall cause and only serve to make the cause on the whole unreasonable.
cobalt wrote:
Another item of note: take a look at the percentages of those who have voted in the poll attached to this thread. While the number of votes is small, this may provide an indication of how it does "hit" people as dlowan says - an emotional issue, to be sure.
Like I said, the prevalence of ignorance is never justification of anything other than an assertion that ignorance is prevalent. You posted this without knowing how Google's service works and many voted based on the incomplete information you gave.
Once again, are you listed in Google? And if not, is Google violating your privacy in any way?