0
   

Is Van Petrov's hypothesis about the 'impossibility' equation true?

 
 
Reply Wed 14 May, 2025 12:15 pm
There is a statement recently published in the author's note:

Quote:
For this complex equation with natural variables (distinct and greater than one), there is no general algorithm to prove or disprove the existence of a solution, except by complete enumeration. Moreover, attempting to prove that no such algorithm exists, as well as attempting to prove this statement, will prove more difficult than simply performing the enumeration.


Quote:
k ^ n * (a^n + b^m) / (n ^ a + c) = n^k * sin(m ^ n + b ^ a) / (m ^ a - c),
where a, b, c, n, m, k ∈ N, a, b, c, n, m, k > 1, and a ≠ b ≠ c ≠ n ≠ m ≠ k.


[Hypothesis on the Equation of Impossibility [Van B. Petrov], 2025, (published only in Russian)]

I wonder how true this statement is and how one could try to prove or disprove it? As I understand it, this is essentially a type of Diophantine equation?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 30 • Replies: 0
No top replies

 
 

Related Topics

Amount of Time - Question by Randy Dandy
logical number sequence riddle - Question by feather
Calc help needed - Question by mjborowsky
HELP! The Product and Quotient Rules - Question by charsha
STRAIGHT LINES - Question by iqrasarguru
Possible Proof of the ABC Conjecture - Discussion by oralloy
Help with a simple math problem? - Question by Anonymous1234567890
How do I do this on a ti 84 calculator? - Question by Anonymous1234567890
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Is Van Petrov's hypothesis about the 'impossibility' equation true?
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/14/2025 at 04:21:21