0
   

GOD---THE SINGULARITY.

 
 
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 22 May, 2022 03:56 pm
@The Anointed,
To be continued.

The Evangelists wrote in Greek rather than in Hebrew...at that time only the capital letters of the Greek alphabet were used in writing, without diacritics, punctuation, or separation between words. Lower case letters appeared only in the ninth century, together with spacing between words. Punctuation marks were introduced only with the invention of the printing press in the 15th century. The present separations of chapters were introduced by Cardinal Hugo in the 13th century.

“Woman without her man is nothing,” But without punctuation, what is being said here? “Woman without her man, is nothing;” or “Woman! Without her, man is nothing.”

The erroneous punctuation which was added by the Roman church of Emperor Constantine in the 15th century, which makes it appear that there were actually three women at the cross by the name Mary, does not reflect the truth as revealed in the scriptures, and that is, that there were only two women by the name ‘MARY’ at the cross of Jesus, and they were his mother and his mother’s sister, or sister-in-law (Who are) Mary the wife of Cleophas and Mary Magdalene.

Knowing from Mark and Luke that there were only two women by the name Mary, mentioned at the cross, the burial, and the empty tomb of Jesus, and that Matthew makes it abundantly clear that the only two women at the cross, the burial, and the empty tomb of Jesus, by the name ‘MARY’ were Mary Magdalene and the OTHER Mary, who was the mother of Jesus, Joseph and James the younger of her family, (At the cross--See Matthew 27: 55-56; There were many women there, looking on from a distance, who had followed Jesus from Galilee and helped him. 56Among them were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Joseph, and the wife of Zebedee. The wife of Zebedee was Salome the sister of Jesus and mother of James and John) verse 61; (At the burial--Mary Magdalene and the "OTHER" Mary were sitting there, facing the tomb.) Matthew 28:1; (At the empty tomb--After the Sabbath, as Sunday morning was dawning, Mary Magdalene and the "OTHER" Mary went to look at the tomb.)

Knowing that Jesus from the cross spoke to his mother, “MARY the wife of Cleophas,” we are left with the only Logical conclusion, that the mother of Jesus, sometime after the death of Herod the Great, had married Joseph/Cleophas/Alpheaus, the son of Alexander Helios, a father of renown and that Joseph/Cleophas/Alpheaus, had adopted Simeon and Jude, the sons of his unmarried sister Mary Magdalene from who Jesus drove out seven demons, and who became the sister-in-law to Mary the biological mother of Jesus, Joseph and James the younger.

Joseph, who was also called Cleophas and Alphaeus, the actual father of Jesus, was to later marry Mary and sire James the younger of her three biological sons, making James the only full brother of Jesus the son of the carpenter. Matthew 13: 55-56; “Isn't he (Jesus) the carpenter's son? Isn't Mary his mother, and aren't James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas his brothers? Aren't all his sisters living here?

The union of Mary and Cleophas would have occurred after Joseph ben Jacob, her original husband, had either died, or had divorced Mary after she had born to him a son who was named ‘Joseph’ after his father.
Mary Magdalene from the northern town of Magdala should not be confused with Mary the sister of Lazarus from Bethany, who is not recorded as being present at the cross of Jesus.

To be continued.
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 22 May, 2022 09:17 pm
@The Anointed,
Continued from previous post.

As James the brother of Jesus was a young man when Jesus began his ministry at the age of about 33, we must conclude that Jesus was only a young boy when Mary married Alphaeus the Father of James the younger of Mary’s three biological sons, who Paul states, is the brother of Jesus.

From “JESUS THE EVIDENCE” by Ian Wilson; “And of James the son of Alphaeus, who was the first to sit on the Episcopal throne of the church of the circumcision in Jerusalem, we learn from Josephus, Eusebius, and Hegesippus, that he was murdered in 62 AD, at the instigation of one of the same Sadducee sect responsible for the death of Stephen, and of his brother Jesus, and that James the righteous was succeeded by Simeon, the son of his uncle.

Joseph/Cleophas/Alphaeus the son of Heli/Alexander Helios III, who I believe adopted Simeon and Jude, the two illegitimate sons of his sister from who, Jesus drove out seven demons, was in actual fact the uncle of Simeon and Jude.

It appears that Josephus and Hegesippus believed that James the son of Alphaeus/Cleophas, is the brother of Jesus, but Eusebius seems to deny this, because it was Eusebius of the Roman church of Emperor Constantine, who claimed that Simeon was the cousin of Jesus, (Which in fact he was) but Eusebius believed that Simeon was the son of Mary the wife of Cleophas, who is supposed to have been, according to the church of Eusebius, the biological sister of Mary the mother of Jesus.

It would be easier to believe that Mary Magdalene was the sister to Cleophas the husband to Mary the mother of Jesus and therefore her sister-in-law, for which there is only circumstantial support to be found in the scriptures, rather than to accept the belief of the Roman church that Hanna had two daughters, who were both named ‘Mary,’ for which belief there is absolutely no scriptural support.

The Roman Church of Emperor Constantine, which was established in the 4th century would never accept that their supposed ever virgin Mary, the mother of Jesus, and wife of Joseph the son of Jacob, would have ever married another man named Cleophas/Alphaeus and bore to him James the brother of Jesus.

Eusebius, was a trusted adviser to Emperor Constantine (St Constantine of the Roman church) who Lynn Cohick, an associate professor of New Testament at Wheaton College, and a specialist on the Origins of Christianity in the Graeco-Roman and Jewish worlds, claims that "Eusebius is a notoriously unreliable historian, and so anything he reports should be critically scrutinized.

And Eusebius wrote; “After James the Just had suffered martyrdom, as the Lord had also on the same account, Symeon, the son of the Lord's uncle, Clopas/Cleophas, was appointed the next bishop. All proposed him as second bishop because he was a cousin of the Lord.

Eusebius, the notoriously unreliable historian according to ‘Lynn Cohick,’ erroneously believed that there were three women at the cross of Jesus, by the name Mary.

It would appear from scripture, that Simeon is the adopted son of his uncle, Joseph/Cleophas/ Alphaeus, the brother to Mary Magdalene and father of Jesus, making Simeon a cousin to Jesus. But James is the biological son of Alphaeus, who is also called ‘Joseph in Hebrew, Cleophas in the Greek, and Alphaeus in Aramaic, and James is the full brother to Jesus, born of the same womb as Jesus and sired by Joseph the son of Heli/Alexander Helios III.

Joseph the second son of Mary, who was sired by her first legal husband, ‘Joseph son of Jacob,’ was a half-brother to Jesus, with Jude and Simeon, the sons, or adopted sons of Joseph/Cleophas/Alpheaus, who were born of another woman prior to Alpheaus/Cleophas/Joseph’s second union with Mary.

Revealing that Matthew 13: 55; is correct where it is said that the carpenter and Mary were the parents of Jesus, (Isn’t he (Jesus) the Carpenters son) whose brothers were James the younger, Joseph, (of who we seem to know very little) Simeon and Jude.

As revealed previously; 'In ART, Thomas Didymus Jude, the son of Alphaeus/Cleophas, is depicted with a, carpenter’s rule and square. In "The Acts of Thomas, sometimes called by its full name, "The Acts of Judas Thomas," 2nd-3rd century CE, "The Apostles cast lots as to where they should go, and to Thomas, brother to Jesus fell India. Thomas was taken to King Goddophares the ruler of Indo-Pathian Kingdom as an architect and carpenter by Habban.”

Jude, the son of Alphaeus the carpenter.

Why, while hanging on the cross, did Jesus entrust his mother into the care of his beloved disciple John, who he had surnamed "Son of Thunder," when his mother Mary had a husband, and two more biological sons, 'Joseph and James' plus two step-sons, 'Simeon and Jude' to care for her?

To be continued.
Theo202
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 22 May, 2022 10:19 pm
@The Anointed,
Quote:
Why, while hanging on the cross, did Jesus entrust his mother into the care of his beloved disciple John, who he had surnamed "Son of Thunder," when his mother Mary had a husband, and two more biological sons, 'Joseph and James' plus two step-sons, 'Simeon and Jude' to care for her?


Because it's an invented story, just like the story of the spear was an invention.
0 Replies
 
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2022 12:03 am
@The Anointed,
Continued from post #7,229,461.
Quote:
Why, while hanging on the cross, did Jesus entrust his mother into the care of his beloved disciple John, who he had surnamed "Son of Thunder," when his mother had a husband, and two more biological sons, plus two step-sons to care for her?


Believing from scripture that Mary had remarried and had borne James the younger of her three biological sons, to Alpheaus/Cleophas, who had two sons, or adopted sons, “Simeon and Jude” who were born of another woman, (Who was possibly Mary magdalen the sister of Joseph.Cleophas/Alphaeus, the sister-in-law to Mary the wife of Cleophas, as well as being the aunty of Jesus and James.) we must now ask the question, ---------did Joseph ben Jacob, Mary’s first husband and Father to young Joseph the second son of Mary of whom we know so little, DIE, or was he still alive at the time of the death of Jesus who was Mary’s first born son?

John 19: 41; Joseph of Arimathea, laid the body of Jesus in a new tomb in which no one had ever been buried. And Luke 23: 53; Joseph of Arimathea, [who is believed by many to be the half-brother of Jesus,] laid the body of Jesus in his own "FAMILY TOMB WHICH HAD NEVER BEEN USED," which would suggest that the father of Joseph from Arimathea was still alive.

If this is the case, then we would be faced with the fact that Joseph ben Jacob, who would have only been in his early sixties when Jesus died, must have divorced Mary at some period, shortly after she had borne to him a son, before issuing her with a bill of divorce sometime after the death of Herod the Great, freeing her from their marriage of convenience, to hide the fact that her son ‘Jesus’ was the son of Joseph/Alphaeus/Cleophas, the son of Alexander Helios III, an actual heir to the throne of David, which marriage had been organized by the Jewish zealots in Nazareth, in whose care, Mary, the daughter of Alexander Helios, was entrusted, and a copy of that bill of divorce would have been kept in the filing systems of the scribes in the Temple, and it would appear that Joseph, who wanted to live in Judea after returning from Egypt, had raised his son and namesake "Joseph the son of Mary" by himself in the town of Arimathea: this being the reason why so little is known of Joseph the son of Mary, and why James the younger of her three biological sons, is always placed before Joseph, her second born son.

But if Mary had remarried while her past husband was still alive, which was absolutely legal according to the law of Moses in those days, as it is today, she would have been seen to be living in a state of adultery according to the new and controversial teaching of Jesus, which stated that anyone who remarries while their current spouse is still alive, they are committing adultery, and the Jewish authorities would have been right onto him. This is of course, exactly what we see in scripture.

The religious authorities of those days were always looking for ways that they might trap Jesus according to his own teaching and then accuse him to the people, and it was after Jesus had been preaching that if a divorced person remarried while their original spouse was still alive, they were committing adultery, that the hypocritical priests having access to the documents in the Temple, thought that they had the means whereby they could make Jesus appear to the people to have one law for himself and another for everyone else.

Pointing to his mother, who was among the women who followed him from Galilee and ministered to the great teacher who was setting Israel on fire, they said to Jesus in their most patronizing voice, "Teacher, this woman has been caught in the very act of adultery." (This was according to the new teaching of Jesus) "In our law Moses commanded that such a woman must be stoned to death. Now, what do you say?" They said this in order to trap Jesus and accuse him to the people. See John 8: 1 to 11.

Jesus knew what those hypocrites were up to. Those hypocrites who thought nothing of stoning the innocent Stephen to death, were bound by the law of Moses to stone this woman to death if she had indeed been caught in the very act of sexual intercourse with a man other than he, too who she was legally married at that time, which was not the case, as she was guilty of no crime according to the temporal laws of the land.

Jesus turned the tables on them by saying, "He who is without sin may cast the first stone." Then he bent down and wrote something in the dust, perhaps he may have written, "As ye judge, so shall ye be judged." Most men in those days, who had been given by Moses the right to issue their wives with a bill of divorce, had done so and taken younger wives, and according to the new teaching of Jesus, they would have been as guilty as the woman that they were falsely accusing, and the hypocrites knowing full well that the woman had not broken the Law of Moses and was innocent of any crime according to their own teachings, they were forced to walk away with their tails between their legs, thereby admitting to the people that they were not without sin.

Jesus then turned to his mother and asked, "Is there no one left to condemn you?" No one Lord she answered. "Well then," said Jesus, "I do not condemn you either. Go, but don’t sin again," and it was for this reason that the mother of Jesus chose to remain separate from her husband Cleophas and his children, Simeon, Judas, and James the younger: and this is the reason why, on the cross, Jesus entrusted his mother, "Mary the wife of Cleophas," into the care of his beloved disciple and nephew, John.

Her husband Cleophas/Alpheaus and his sons, James, Simeon and Jude, did not abandon Mary, but rather, it was she who abandoned them, in obedience to her firstborn.

Acts 1: 14; It was the custom of the disciples after the death of Jesus, to meet and worship with the mother and family of Jesus; [His sisters, his father Cleophas/Alpheaus/Joseph the son of Heli, his half brother Simeon, etc].
Then after Peter was miraculously released from prison, Peter ran straight to the house where he knew the faithful would be gathered in prayer for his safety, to the House of Mary the Mother of young John, who had been surnamed "MARK," which, according to Young's Analytical Concordance to the Bible, means, "Hammer, or the Hammerer," and John surnamed "Mark," is associated with young John, who Jesus had surnamed "Son of thunder." [Thor]

Joseph the son of Heli, also called Alphaeus and Cleophas, who the disciples were to later surname Barnabas, was a disciple of Jesus. He was a Macedonian native of Cyprus, where he possessed land (Acts 4:36, 37), which he sold, giving the proceeds to the church in Jerusalem.

Paul and Barnabas were appointed as missionaries to Asia Minor. It was in this capacity, and taking with them, young John who was surnamed “Mark,” who was the adopted son of Mary the half-sister of Joseph who had been surnamed Barnabas, they visited Cyprus and some of the principal cities of Pamphylia, Pisidia, and Lycaonia (Acts 13:14).

After they had returned to Antioch from the Jerusalem council and after spending some time there (15:35), Paul asked Barnabas to accompany him on another journey (15:36). Barnabas wished to take John surnamed Mark along, but Paul did not, as he had left them on the former journey (15:37-38). The dispute ended by Paul and Barnabas taking separate routes. Paul took Silas as his companion, and journeyed through Syria and Cilicia; while Barnabas took John surnamed Mark to visit Cyprus and the land of Pamphylia, where today, in the town of Ephesus, the grave sites of Mary the [Half-sister] of Joseph/Barnabas and adopted mother to John the beloved disciple, can still be visited.

https://www.bing.com/search?q=The+burial+site+of+John+the+apostle%3F&form=ANNNB1&refig=cd0d48b753684e9a9239ca36c1ab3fcd

ανεψιος [anepsios] appears only the one time in the New Testament: In Young’s Literal Translation its meaning is “Nephew,” Salute you doth Aristarchus, my fellow-captive, and Marcus, the nephew of Barnabas, In the King James Version, it is translated “Sister’s son.” “Marcus, sister’s son to Barnabas.” John surnamed Mark was the son, adopted son, or grandson, of Mary the sister to Joseph who was surnamed Barnabas.

It is my belief that Salome, who is among the women from Galilee, who followed and ministered to Jesus and his apostles, was the eldest of the sisters of Jesus and that she had married Zebedee to who she bore the two sons, James the elder and John, the nephews of Jesus, and she believed that her brother had been groomed by the zealots as the Messianic promised king, who was to free Israel from the yoke of Roman rule.

Matthew 20: 20-21; Then the wife of Zebedee came to Jesus with her two sons, bowed before him, and asked him a favour. “What do you want?” Jesus asked her. She answered, “Promise me that these two sons of mine will sit at your right and your left when you are King.”

It was to James and his brother John, the sons of Zebedee, that Jesus gave them the name Boanerges, which means “Men of Thunder.” See Mark 3: 17.

Mark 10: 35-37; Then James and John, the sons of Zebedee, came to Jesus. “Teacher,” they said, “there is something we want you to do for us.” “What is it?” Jesus asked them. They answered, “When you sit on your throne in your glorious Kingdom, we want you to let us sit with you, one at your right and one at your left.”

To be continued.
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2022 05:14 pm
@The Anointed,
Continued from previous post.

The great grandfather of the biblical Jesus was Yehoshua/Jesus III, who was the high priest in Jerusalem from 36 to 23 BC and is believed to have been murdered at the orders of Herod the Great. The sonless Yehoshua, had three daughters, Joanna, Elizabeth and Anna/Hanna, whose mother was from the tribe of Asher.

Knowing that his Zadokian lineage would become extinct unless his daughters were placed with future husbands according to the Torah, he married them off to chosen husbands.

Joanna, was betrothed to Joachim from the non-royal genetic lineage of David. The second daughter of Yehoshua III, was Elizabeth. This was the Elizabeth, who, at a very advanced age was to become the mother of John the Baptist in 7 BC, a year before the birth of Jesus and some 16 years after the death of her father ‘Yehoshua/Jesus III,’ in 23 BC, and she was betrothed to a Levite priest by the name Zacharias of the priestly course of Abijah.

The young Davidian prince Heli, [Alexander Helios III] the son, or adopted son of Mattathias ben Levi, was chosen by Yehoshua/Jesus III the high priest in Jerusalem, as the candidate to marry his daughter Hanna/Anna.

Jehoshua III, the High Priest until 23 BC, is supposed to have died three years before the birth of his grand-daughter ‘Mary.’ If it was his death that ended his period as high priest in Jerusalem in the year of 23 BC, this would mean that Mary was born in 20 BC, the same year as the birth of Philip the son of Herod the Great and his young Jewess wife, ‘Cleopatra.’

Therefore, Mary would have been 7 years old when her father Heli was murdered in 13 BC, and 14 years old when she gave birth to Jesus, who was born in 6 BC, two years before the death of Herod the Great in 4 BC, making Mary about 47 years old when Jesus, the first of her three biological sons, was crucified.

There are two men from around this period, who were named ‘Alexander Helios III’, one was the son of Cleopatra and Mark Anthony, who was adopted out after the suicidal deaths of his parents, with absolutely no historical evidence of what may have happened to him, the other, was the son (Or adopted son) of Mattathias=Mattat and his wife Esther of Jerusalem, or Queen Alexandra II, a close friend of Cleopatra the Queen of Egypt.

Alexandra was to become the mother (Or step-mother) of Heli ben Mattat or Prince Alexander Helios III. who became the father of Mary the mother of Jesus.

Esther of Jerusalem can be identified as the future Maccabee Queen known by her Greek name as Queen Alexandra II, who was the great grandmother of Yeshua (Jesus). This subject will be more fully discussed at a later date.

To be continued.
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2022 08:51 pm
@The Anointed,
Continued from previous post.

Hanna, was the daughter of Jehosua the high priest in Jerusalem and his wife Phanuel of the tribe of Asher, and Hanna, the sister of Elizabeth, who gave birth to John the baptist at a very advanced age, was the aged grandmother of Jesus. She had been a virgin until she was about 70 when she was betrothed to young Alexander Helios, an heir to the throne of David and the young father of Mary.

He was murdered by Herod the Great around 13 BC when Hanna was 77. And Hanna was 84 years old and had been a widow for seven years, from the death of her husband until the birth of Jesus her grandson in 6 BC.

Immediately after the death of Alexander Helios/Heli, the young 7 years old Mary is said to have been taken into Galilee and protected and raised by the Zealots, whose aim it was, to throw off the yoke of Roman rule and establish a descendant of David on the throne. While Hanna, the elderly mother of Mary did not depart from the Temple in Jerusalem, worshiping, fasting and praying night and day etc. See Luke 2: 36…….

A likely candidate for the Zealots plan, would be a son born to Mary and her half-brother Joseph, who were both sired by a Davidic and Hasmonean prince, called Alexander Helios III/Heli, who is said to have been executed, in the world where many Davidian aspirants, as the “young lions of Judah”, were eliminated by the cruel and tyrannical King Herod the Great.

The Greek word “Parthenos”, carries a basic meaning of unmarried youth, ‘Male or female’ and denotes ‘virgin’ only by implication.

In Nazareth, Mary, the young 13 years old Parthenos was visited by a messenger of God who told her that she was to become pregnant and bear a son who would inherit the throne of his genetic ancestor, King David, but the young Parthenos said, “How can this be as I have never had sexual intercourse with a man,” thereby implying that the young Parthenos, was still a virgin at that time.

Mary was then told that her aged aunty Elisabeth was 6 months pregnant, immediately after this, Mary got ready and hurried off to a town in the hill country of Judea. She went into Zechariah's house and greeted Elizabeth.

When Elizabeth heard Mary's greeting, the baby moved within her.

Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit and said in a loud voice, “You are the most blessed of all women, and blessed is the child you will bear! Why should this great thing happen to me, that my Lord's mother comes to visit me? For as soon as I heard your greeting, the baby within me jumped with gladness. How happy you are to believe that the Lord's message to you will come true!”

How did Elizabeth know that the message to young Mary was, that she was to become pregnant and bear the future King of Israel, ‘Jesus,’ a descendant of King David, through his father Joseph the son of Alexander Helios/Heli and that the act by which the child would be conceived, would be hidden in the shadow beneath the wings of the Lord of spirits who would over-shadow her act of obedience.

In the genealogy of Joseph ben Jacob, who married the already pregnant Mary, and who did not consummate that union until after she had given birth to her firstborn son, which genealogy is recorded in Matthew, five righteous women are mentioned: Tamar, who played the prostitute and seduced Judah, her father-in law into having sex with her, by which union she conceived and later bore his twin sons, Perez and Zerah. Then there is Rahab the madam of a whore house in Jericho, who saved the Israelite spies and who later married Salmon, and bore his son ‘Boaz.’ The third is Ruth, who with sexual cunning deceived Boaz into marrying her, to whom she bore ‘Obed.’ The fourth is Bathsheba, who committed adultery with King David, who had her husband ‘Uriah’ killed, and she was the mother of Solomon, of whom the Lord said; “He shall be my son and I shall be his Father and it is he who shall build my temple for me.” [See 2nd Samuel 7: 14. and 1st Chronicles 17: 13.] Solomon was then blessed with the rulership of the most glorious period of Israel’s history. And last of all is Mary who united with her half-brother Joseph the son of Alexander Helios to conceive and bear Jesus, the promised Messiah.

Was Elizabeth a party to the conspiracy? And was Joseph the son of Alexander Helios already there among the family and friends of the aged and pregnant Mother of John the Baptist, who had gathered at her house to rejoice with her in her late aged pregnancy? After staying in the house of her aunty Elisabeth until her son John was born, over three months later Mary returned to Nazareth pregnant, and after the birth of Jesus.

Joseph the son of Jacob, who took the already pregnant Mary to wife, had no sexual relations with her until she had given birth to Jesus, then consummated their union of convenience, to hide the fact from Herod the Great, that the son of Mary was a legitimate Heir to the throne of King David.

The priestly advisers to Herod would not have seen a son of Joseph ben Jacob, as a threat to Herod, for according to his genealogy, he was a descendant of Jehoiachin of who it is written in Jeremiah 22: 29-30; O land, land, land! Listen to what the LORD has said: “This man is condemned to lose his children, to be a man who will never succeed. He will have no descendants who will rule in Judah as David's successors. I, the LORD, have spoken.”

John the Baptist, the first cousin to Mary the mother of Jesus, who later on in life, and while in prison, sent his disciples to Jesus to ask if he really were the promised king and saviour of the Israelites, or if they had to wait for someone else?

Surely John would not have doubted for one moment that Jesus was the promised Messiah, if he believed that his cousin Mary was an ever virgin, in whose womb, an alien life form that pre-existed the creation of the cosmos, created for itself a human like body that was not of the seed of Adam, which body had not inherited the penalty of Adams sin?

From the Revised Standard Version, Luke 2: 36; “And there was a prophetess, Anna the daughter of Phanuel of the tribe of Asher; she was of a great age, [84] having lived with her husband 7 years from her virginity [married at the age of 70] lived with her husband until he was murdered when she was 77 and as a widow for 7 years until she was 84 when her grandson Jesus was born.

From Young’s Analytical Concordance to the Bible; “Phanuel:” An Asherite and mother of Hanna/Anna the prophetess who came into the temple when Jesus was presented there by his parents, and spoke of him to those who looked for redemption [Deliverance from the yoke of Rome] in Israel.

To be continued.
0 Replies
 
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 24 May, 2022 05:40 am
@The Anointed,
Quote:
Alexandra was to become the mother (Or step-mother) of Heli ben Mattat or Prince Alexander Helios III, who became the father of Mary the mother of Jesus.
Esther of Jerusalem can be identified as the future Maccabee Queen known by her Greek name as Queen Alexandra II, who was the great grandmother of Yeshua (Jesus)
.


It doesn't matter whether Prince Alexander Helios III, who became the father of Mary the mother of Jesus, was the biological son or adopted son of Mattat and Alexandra II, he would have still been a legitimate heir to the throne of King David, as the Talmud states, "Whoever brings up an orphan in his home is regarded...as though the child had been born to him." (Sanhedrin 19b).” In other words, the adopted child is to be treated as a child born to the father of that house, which means, that Heli and his descendants, who were born from the genetic line of Nathan ‘the prophet,’ who was the adopted son of King David, were legitimate heirs to King David, although originally, not to the throne of Israel, as the prophesied Messiah had to come through the genetic line of Solomon.

The descendants of Nathan the prophet only became heirs to the throne of David, through Nathan the son of Uriah and Bathsheba, the adopted son of King David, when Naria, a descendant of Nathan, married Tamar, a female descendant of King Solomon, who bore to Naria a son by the name “Salathiel.”

After the death of Naria, Tamar was taken to wife by King Jehoiachin, whose only biological son with Tamar, was Zedekiah who died prematurely in Childhood.

According to Torah law, Nathan the adopted son of King David, and Nathan’s descendants, were legitimate heirs of King David, but not in the ancestral line of the promised Messiah, who was to be born of the seed of Solomon, until Naria the descendant of Nathan coupled with Tamar the descendant of Solomon, to produce Salathiel the ancestor of Jesus, who has been made High Priest (From the tribe of Levi=Nathan) and King (From the tribe of Judah=Solomon) in the order of Melchizedek.

David Hughes the noted Genealogist of the Ancient World Lineages, states that King Jeconiah’s only son, with Queen Tamar, ‘Prince Zedekiah,’ died prematurely in childhood, and in 586 BCE King Zedekiah, the last king of Israel, whose original name Mattaniah, was the son of Josiah and the uncle of Jehoiachin. King Zedekiah/Mattaniah, was taken prisoner and his sons were executed in front of him, after which, his eyes were gouged out, and there in Babylon, he remained blinded in exile for the rest of his life and it appeared that the entire royal lineage of King David through God’s chosen son, Solomon, had been exterminated.

With all the known direct lineages of male heirs to the lineage of King Solomon the son of King David and Bathsheba now extinct, Queen Tamar II became the dynastic heiress preserving not only the Lineage of King Solomon, but also became the inter-dynastic link, or the vital crossover heiress merging the non-royal Nathan lineage with the royal lineages of King Solomon. With the addition of Tamar representing the mainline descendants of King David, we now can understand the linkage between the two prime royal and non-royal lineages to the ancestry of the Jewish Messiah Yehoshua ben Yosef (Jesus son of Joseph the son of Alexander Helios a descendant of Nathan).

Jesus carried in his genes the potent fusion of Davidian and Zadokian bloodlines. He carried the potent bloodline of the royal mantle as a Priest-King of Israel and the messianic mantle as the Maschiach Yisra’el (Messiah of Israel) of the House of David.

Luke 3:23; reveals that Jesus was the grandson of HELI, (Alexander Helios=Heli,) and he was called God, the son of God, King of kings, etc, which was not unusual in those days. Originally, Cleopatra ruled with her father Ptolemy XII and later with her brothers, Ptolemy XIII and Ptolemy XIV, whom she married as per Egyptian custom, but eventually she became sole ruler.

No children were born from her union with her two brothers, but she did bear a son [Caesarion] to Julius Caesar, who was later elevated to co-ruler in name only. It is also written, at the time of the assassination of Caesar by Brutus and his companions, that Cleopatra was living in Rome in a villa of Caesars, who then, fearing for her life also, fled Rome and returned to Alexandria in Egypt.

Cicero was to later write a series of letters alluding to the fact that she was at that time pregnant with a second child by Julius Caesar. If Caesarion, the son of Julius Caesar and Cleopatra, who Augustus had murdered, had a full sister, the daughter of Cleopatra and Julius Caesar, she would not have been seen as a threat to the new Caesar Augustus as Caesarion was, and would have been spared, as no woman could ever rule in Rome. But, if the child of Cleopatra, who Cicero alludes too, was a son sired by Julius Caesar, he would have been eliminated as was Caesarion.

Cleopatra represented herself as the reincarnation of the Egyptian goddess ‘Isis’, and was given the title of “Queen of Kings” by Mark Anthony. Her son ‘Caesarion’ was also given many titles, including ‘god’, ‘Son of god’ and ‘King of Kings’ and was depicted as Horus the son of Isis.

It was after the assassination of Caesar in 44 BC, that Cleopatra coupled up with Mark Anthony and in 40 BC she bore to him the twins, ‘Cleopatra Selene II and Alexander Helios III,’ and later on another son, Ptolemy Philadelphus.

In late 34 BC, at the Donations of Alexandria, shortly after Anthony had conquered Armenia, Cleopatra and Caesarion were crowned rulers of Egypt and Cyprus. Alexander Helios, their six-year-old son, was crowned ruler of Aemenia, Media and Parthia; Cleopatra Selene II, Heli’s six-year-old twin sister, was crowned ruler of Cyrenaica and Libya, and Ptolemy Philadelphus, the younger of their three children was crowned ruler of Phoenicia, Syria and Cilicia.

Isis was the most popular goddess from the time of Psamtik 1 (663-610 B.C) till the coming of Christianity, her cult appealed to the Greeks and Romans alike and when Egypt came under Roman rule, her cult spread through much of Europe. By the time of Jesus, the chief centre of her worship was in Rome. Isis is commonly depicted with Horus the child (Harpocrates) on her lap, and today, it is almost impossible to distinguish between the late pagan and early Christian figures of the mother and child, [Isis and Horus---Mary and Jesus] it’s almost as though the old Pagan Queen was stripped of her mythical garments and clothed with the new covering of Christianity.

To be continued.
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 24 May, 2022 04:30 pm
@The Anointed,
Quote:
The descendants of Nathan the prophet only became heirs to the throne of David, through Nathan the son of Uriah and Bathsheba, the adopted son of King David.


There are of course, those who refuse to accept that Nathan the Levite, who was the biological son of Uriah and Bathsheba, and who, after the death of ‘Uriah’ his father, was adopted by King David who took to wife, Bathsheba the mother of Shimea, Shobab and Nathan, the three sons that had been sired by Uriah the Hittite.

They base their refusal to accept that Shimea, Shobab and Nathan, the three sons of Bathsheba, were sired by Uriah the Hittite, because in 1st Chronicles 3: 5; it is written “There was born to David in Jerusalem, four sons: Shimea, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, four of Bathsheba the daughter of Ammiel.”

To them, it would appear from this passage that the three elder sons of Bathsheba were sired by King David, but such is not the case. Because we read in 2 Samuel 14: 27, “There was born to Absalom three sons, and one daughter whose name was Tamar; she was a beautiful woman.”

Does this mean that Absalom sired three sons? No! In fact, Absalom sired no sons, because again we read in 2 Samuel 18: 18, “Because Absalom had no son, he built a monument in King’s Valley and named it Absalom’s Monument, to keep his name alive.” But then, it is also said in 2 Samuel 14: 27; ‘Absalom had three sons and a daughter named ‘Tamar,’ A very beautiful woman.”

The three elder sons of Bathsheba, who were born to the house of David, were not sired by the King, and nor were the three sons who are said to have been born to Absalom, actually sired by him.

The Hebrew term “BEN” which is translated as sons, can also mean grandsons, male descendants, and adopted sons.

1 Chronicles 3: 2, the name of the mother of Absalom and Tamar, was Maacah. 2 Chronicles 11: 20, Rehoboam the Son of Solomon, loved the daughter of Absalom, [Tamar] who was named in honour of Maacah, the mother of Absalom.

Maacah/Tamar bore four descendants for Absalom her father, three males and one female, which children were sired by Rehoboam, the son of Solomon. Those three sons by Maacah/Tamar the daughter of Absalom, were named, Abijah, Attai and Ziza, and one daughter, Shelomith.

In my opinion, Absalom was sterile and had sired no children at all, and that Tamar the daughter of his mother Maacah, was adopted by Absalom after she had been raped by her half-brother ‘Amnon.’ From that day on, the motherless Tamar lived in the house of her brother Absalom, who cared for her every need. There were no adoption agencies in those days, but Tamar was adopted by her elder brother Absalom, who, two years later had his half-brother Amnon, who had raped his little sister, murdered by the hands of his servants.

The first child born of the adulterous union between King David and Bathsheba the mother of Shimea, Shobab and Nathan, died shortly after its birth. Later, King David comforted the grieving Bathsheba and she bore his biological son “Solomon,” the youngest of Bathsheba’s four sons. See 2nd Samuel 12: 22-25. . . . . Nathan the Levite ancestor of Jesus was the adopted son of King David of the tribe of Judah.

Uriah’s sons, became members of the tribe of Levi by his marriage to Bathsheba the daughter of Ammiel, the son of Oded-Edom, who was a descendant of Moses from the house of Levi, by his second wife Jepunniah, an Ethiopian woman, [See Numbers 12: 1; KJV] who was the widow of a man from the tribe of Judah, and the mother of Caleb, who, at the age of forty, became the adopted son of Moses from the tribe of Levi, and Jepunniah was the daughter of Hobab the Kennite, one of the two fathers-in-law to Moses, [See Judges 4: 11.]

Hobab the Kennite, who was the father of Moses’ second wife ‘Jepunniah,’ had married one of the seven daughters of Jethro, who was a descendant of Abraham through his second wife Keturah, making him not only the father-in-law to Moses but also his brother-in-law, as the first wife of Moses, ‘Zipporah’ who he sent away, was also a daughter of Jethro.

Orthodox Jews, who believe that matrilineality and matriarchy within Judaism are related to the metaphysical concept of the Jewish soul, maintain that matrilineal descent is an oral law from at least the time of the covenant at Sinai.

Because Bathsheba, the wife of Uriah the Hittite was a Jewish descendant of Moses the Levite, Uriah’s three sons, Shimea, Shobab, and Nathan, were accepted as Jews.

Alexander Helios=Heli, the biological grand-father of Jesus, according to the genealogy of Jesus as recorded in Luke 3: 23; was a descendant of Nathan, and scripture reveals that Nathan was not a biological son of King David. Zechariah 12: 11-12; In that day shall there be a great mourning in Jerusalem, as the mourning of Hadadrimmon in the valley of Megiddon. And the land shall mourn, every family apart; the family of the house of David apart, and their wives apart; the family of the house of Nathan apart, and their wives apart, etc.

To be continued.

The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 24 May, 2022 08:03 pm
@The Anointed,
Yehoshua ben Miriam (Jesus son of Mary)
Though the evidence is only circumstantial, it is suggested by David Hughes and other genealogist that the wife of Matthat ben Levi, called Esther of Jerusalem, was actually the Jewish name of the last Maccabee Queen, whose later Greek regnal name was Queen Alexandra II. Before Alexandra became a Maccabee Queen with her 2nd marriage to Maccabee King Alexander II, her cousin, and later her 3rd marriage to Maccabee King Antigonus, also her cousin, she was married to a Nasi and Prince of Israel, called Mattathias.

Was this Mattathias also the person as Matthat ben Levi, the father of Heli, the grandfather of Mary, and the great grandfather of Yehoshua (Jesus)? The evidence suggests the affirmative.

The name of the children of this union between Mattathias, the Nasi and Prince of Israel and Princess Alexandra II, prior to 49 BCE was Prince Alexander III Helios (the Biblical Heli) and his sister, Princess Alexandra III. This young Davidian and Maccabee princess later became the wife of Ptolemy Bar Mennius, a Babylonian Exilarch whose descendants are traced to Europe today.

We ask again, was this Davidian Nasi Prince Mattat ben Levi, the same Nasi as Prince Mattathias, who married the Maccabee Princess, and future Maccabee Queen, as the daughter of the Maccabee Priest-King Hyrcanus II and through this union had a son called Prince Alexander III “Helios”?

Because he was of Idumaean/Hittite/Macedonian descent, and hated by the Jews, Herod the Great attempted to appease them by marrying a Jewess by the name Mariamne, a descendant of the Maccabees family of Jewish patriots, whom he actually loved.

Mariamne, the daughter of Alexandra, an heir from the old ruling Hasmonaean line had insisted that her brother be appointed high priest, Prince Alexander Helios III, the grandfather of Jesus, was the son of the future Maccabee Queen Alexandra II, who at this time was known by her Jewish name, Esther of Jerusalem. Heli, the shortened nickname for Helios (“The Sun”), was a descendant, of Mattathias, the Nasi and Prince of Israel.

His 1st wife, Esther of Jerusalem, became the mother of Heli ben Mattat or Prince Alexander Helios III. He became the father of Mary, the mother of Jesus. Esther of Jerusalem can be identified as the future Maccabee Queen known by her Greek name as Queen Alexandra II, who was the great grandmother of Yeshua (Jesus). Jan 18, 2017

Cleopatra of Jerusalem was a woman who lived in the 1st century BC. She was the fifth wife of Herod the Great, the King of Judea .

Josephus mentions "Cleopatra of Jerusalem" twice: once in his Antiquities of the Jews 17.1.3 and once in his The Jewish War 1.28.4. She had married King Herod the Great in 25 BC, and she named her first son Philadelphus, which was the name of Cleopatra Selene II younger brother.

Cleopatra’s children by Herod were raised and educated in Rome. After the death of her husband Herod the Great in 4 BC, her son “Philip’ inherited some of his father’s dominion and Herod Philadelphus/Philip, was given control of southern Lebanon and modern Syria, to the east of the Lake Galilee [Philip of Bethsaida] which he ruled until 34 C.E., when he disappears from the pages of history shortly after the death and resurrection of Jesus.

To be continued.
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2022 03:23 pm
@The Anointed,
In the Bible, many of the events of the past foreshadowed something greater later on.

The birth of Jesus, the reality of God's promise to Abraham, was 'foreshadowed' by the birth of Isaac.

Galatians 4: 29; At that time, the child born according to the flesh, [Ishmael], despised and persecuted him, [Isaac] who was born according to 'God’s promise' and 'the workings of the Holy Spirit.'

Isaac, who is the prototype of Jesus, was born of a brother/sister relationship and born of God’s promise according to the power/workings of the Holy Spirit, and Isaac was the biological son of Abraham and his half-sister Sarah, who were both sired by Terah from different mothers: just as Jesus, who was born of God’s promise according to the power of the Holy Spirit, was the biological son of Joseph and his half-sister Mary, who were both sired by Alexander Helios from different mothers.

Isaac, was offered up as a sacrifice by his father on the same mountain that Jesus, who had been chosen as the heir to our Fathers throne, was offered up. But both lived on, as God had prepared a replacement sacrifice for them. The replacement for Isaac, was a sheep, the replacement for Jesus, was the one year old unblemished lamb of God, [Enoch] who, at the age of 365, the number of days in a calendar year, was taken to the throne of the Most High in the creation and anointed as his successor, to serve God before the body of Adam/mankind into all eternity.

Just as Isaac the promised seed of Abraham was born through the union of Abraham and his half-sister Sarah according to the workings of the Holy Spirit, so too, the man Jesus, the reality of God’s promise to Abraham, was born according to the workings of the Holy Spirit and born of the union of Mary and her half-brother Joseph, who were both sired by Heli=Alexander Helios.

Jesus was born a 'Son of God' not by blood, nor by the will of the flesh, nor by the will of man, but by the spirit of our Lord and saviour, 'The Son of Man' the MOST HIGH in the creation, which spirit of HE, who "IS" in heaven, descended upon Jesus in the form of a dove as the heavenly voice was heard to say; "You are my son (My chosen heir and successor) 'THIS DAY' I have begotten thee."

The book of Enoch the prophet, concerning the Elect one of righteousness, 49: 2-4; "For he is mighty in all the secrets of righteousness, And unrighteousness shall disappear as a shadow, And have no continuance; Because the Elect One standeth before the Lord of Spirits, And his glory is for ever and ever, And his might unto all generations.

3 And in him dwells the spirit of wisdom, And the spirit which gives insight, And the spirit of understanding and of might, And the spirit of those who have fallen asleep in righteousness.

4 And he shall judge the secret things, And none shall be able to utter a lying word before him; For he is the Elect One before the Lord of Spirits according to His good pleasure.

Then in chapter 51:4; Enoch writes; "And the Elect One shall in those days sit on 'MY throne'."

Who was it, that the only exception of all mankind to inherit the throne of the Most High in the creation, 'The Son of Man' who "IS" in Heaven, filled with his spirit and chose him as his heir and successor, the man who is now incontestably divine and sits in the heavenly throne of our God and saviour, and who invites all, who like himself are also able to win the victory, to sit with him in the heavenly throne of the Godhead to the creation? See Rev 3:21.

In chapter 45; Enoch speaks concerning those who deny the name of the dwelling of the holy ones and the Lord of Spirits.

2 And into the heaven they shall not ascend, And on the earth they shall not come: Such shall be the lot of the sinners Who have denied the name of the Lord of Spirits, Who are thus preserved for the day of suffering and tribulation.

3 On that day Mine Elect One shall sit on the throne of glory And shall try their works, And their places of rest shall be innumerable. And their souls shall grow strong within them when they see Mine Elect Ones, (PLURAL) And those who have called upon My glorious name: JHWH=Who I Am.

Then will I cause Mine Elect One to dwell among them. And I will transform the heaven and make it an eternal blessing and light. And I will transform the earth and make it a blessing: And I will cause Mine elect ones to dwell upon it: But the sinners and evil-doers shall not set foot thereon. For I have provided and satisfied with peace My righteous ones And have caused them to dwell before Me: But for the sinners there is judgement impending with Me, So that I shall destroy them from the face of the earth. (See Rev 21: 5-8.)

Enoch inherited the throne of the MOST HIGH in the creation.
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2022 04:58 am
@The Anointed,
Quote:
In the Bible, many of the events of the past foreshadowed something greater later on. The birth of Jesus, the reality of God's promise to Abraham, was 'foreshadowed' by the birth of Isaac.


We will now attempt to explain how Isaac, who is a prototype of Jesus, was born of God’s promise according to the workings of the Holy Spirit.

The scriptures do not reveal exactly what Canaan had done to his grandfather Noah, as he lay naked in a drunken stupor in his tent, so we can only speculate as to what occurred. My own personal opinion is that Canaan, the ancestor of today’s Palestinians, sodomised his grandfather, but like I said, that is only my personal opinion.

Shem, is the younger brother of Ham the firstborn son of Noah, and Ham is the father of Canaan whom Noah cursed when he awoke from his drunken stupor and realised what his youngest ben=male descendant [Canaan] had done to him. After cursing Canaan, Shem was given the blessing of first born by Noah, which was removed from his elder brother, “Ham,” because of what his son Canaan had done to him. See Genesis 9: 24 to 27.

The scriptures tell us that Noah had begun his family when he had turned 500, If it had been after he turned 505, the bible would have stated that, if it was after Noah had turned 502, this would have been revealed in scripture, but no! The Bible tells us that it was when Noah turned 500 that he began his family.

לב וַיְהִי-נֹחַ, בֶּן-חֲמֵשׁ מֵאוֹת שָׁנָה; וַיּוֹלֶד נֹחַ, אֶת-שֵׁם אֶת-חָם וְאֶת-יָפֶת. 32 And Noah was five hundred years old; and Noah begot Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

Genesis 8: 4; On the seventeenth day of the seventh month of the six hundredth year of Noah, the boat came to rest on a mountain in the Ararat range, showing that Noah, who began his family with his firstborn son (HAM) in his 500 th year, was six hundred years old when the flood came to its finish. Then in Genesis 11: 10; we read; “These are the descendants of Shem. Two years after the flood, when Shem was 100 years old etc.” Here, the scriptures reveal to all, that Shem was born when Noah was 502.

And again, in Genesis 10: 21; we read that “Shem is the older brother of Japheth.” Knowing from the scriptures, that Japheth was the younger brother of Shem, and being assured by the scriptures that Shem was born when Noah was 502, and that Noah began his Family when he turned 500; we have deduced from all this, that Ham was the firstborn son of Noah. Even the Hebrew Scriptures would appear to support the fact that Ham is the firstborn followed by Shem the elder brother to Japheth, the youngest son of Noah.

כ אֵלֶּה בְנֵי-חָם, לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם לִלְשֹׁנֹתָם, בְּאַרְצֹתָם, בְּגוֹיֵהֶם. {ס} 20 These are the sons of Ham, after their families, after their tongues, in their lands, in their nations.

כא וּלְשֵׁם יֻלַּד, גַּם-הוּא: אֲבִי, כָּל-בְּנֵי-עֵבֶר--אֲחִי, יֶפֶת הַגָּדוֹל. 21 And unto Shem, the father of all the children of Eber, the elder brother of Japheth, to him also were children born.

The reason why God sent the descendants of Shem into the land of the firstborn son of Noah, Ham/Egypt, where they interbred with the descendants of Ham the firstborn for 215 years before God killed all the first born Egyptians, after which he called his son out of Egypt, in who was the spirit of Firstborn, was because of what Canaan the youngest descendant of Noah had done to him while he lay naked in his tent in a drunken stupor; Genesis 9: 24; When Noah sobered up and learned what his youngest descendant had done to him, he cursed Canaan and blessed his second son Shem, on who he then bestowed the blessing of first born.

Jubilees 7: 13; And Ham knew that his father had cursed his younger son, and he was displeased that he had cursed his son. and he parted from his father, he and his sons with him, Cush and Mizraim and Put and Canaan. And he built for himself a city and called its name after the name of his wife Ne’elatama’uk.

The Book of Jubilees Chapter 8: When Noah divided the Land among his three sons, Shem received the middle portion, from the delta of the river of Egypt, north to Lebanon and east to India, while Ham received the land of Africa to the south, and Japheth received the land to the north of Lebanon, which according to the book of Jubilees 8: 30; It is said that the Land of Japheth included the five great islands and a great land in the north. But it is cold, and the land of Ham is Hot, and the land of Shem (The middle son) is neither hot nor cold, but it is of blended cold and heat.

The sons of Noah then divided their portion of land among their sons, and it is written in Jubilees 9: 14; “And thus the sons of Noah divided unto their sons in the presence of Noah their father, and he bound them all by an oath, imprecating a curse on everyone who sought to seize the portion that had not fallen to him by lot. And they all said, ‘So be it; so be it,’ for themselves and for their sons forever throughout their generations til the day of judgement, etc.”

Then in chapter 10: 29; we read; “And Canaan saw the land of Lebanon to the river Egypt, that it was very good, and he went not into the land of his inheritance to the west (That is to) the sea, and he dwelt in the land of Lebanon, eastward and westward from the border of the Jordan and from the border of the sea. And Ham his father, and Cush and Mizraim, his brothers said unto him: ‘Thou hast settled in a land which is not thine, and which did not fall to us by lot: do not do so; for if thou dost do so, thou and thy sons will fall in the land and be accursed through sedition; for by sedition ye have settled; and by sedition will thy children fall, and thou shalt be rooted out forever, etc.

After Noah had transferred the blessing of firstborn to Shem, the Lord God then had to remove from Ham the spirit of Firstborn and implant it into the expanded body of Shem.

Anyone who breeds pedigrees will know that if their pedigree bitch is impregnated by a mongrel, and semen is introduced into the bitch, whether or not conception occurs with that mating, any future offspring from that bitch will carry certain characteristics of the mongrel, for the two had become one. A pup from a passive breed, may inherit aggressiveness, or some other trait of the mongrel.

Because of what his youngest descendant ‘Canaan’ had done to him while he lay naked in his tent in a drunken stupor, Noah cursed Canaan and removed the blessing of first born from Canaan’s father “Ham,” and gave it to his second born son ‘Shem,’ who was born when Noah was 502 and Shem is the older brother of Japheth. Now, the Holy Spirit had to transfer the spirit of the first born (Ham) to the body of the second born (Shem).

The Book of Jubilees 11: 10; reveals that Terah, the father of Abraham and Sarah was born in the Hebrew year of 1806 AM, then in verse 14 of the same chapter it is written; that in [1870 A.M.] Terah took to himself a wife, and her name was ’Edna, the daughter of ’Abram, the daughter of his father’s sister. And in the seventh year of this week [1876 A.M.] [When Terah was 70, Edna bare him a son, and he called his name Abram, by the name of the father of Abraham’s mother Edna; for he had died before his daughter had conceived a son. 10 years later Terah sired a daughter to another woman other than Edna.

Tobe continued.
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2022 05:24 pm
@The Anointed,
Continued from previous post.

Quote:
We will now attempt to explain how Isaac, who is a prototype of Jesus, was born of God’s promise according to the workings of the Holy Spirit.


After Noah had transferred the blessing of firstborn to Shem, the Lord God then had to remove from Ham the spirit of Firstborn and implant it into the expanded body of Shem.

Anyone who breeds pedigrees will know that if their pedigree bitch is impregnated by a mongrel, and semen is introduced into the bitch, whether or not conception occurs with that mating, any future offspring from that bitch will carry certain characteristics of the mongrel, for the two had become one. A pup from a passive breed, may inherit aggressiveness, or some other trait of the mongrel.

Because of what his youngest descendant ‘Canaan’ had done to him while he lay naked in his tent in a drunken stupor, Noah cursed Canaan and removed the blessing of first born from Canaan’s father “Ham,” and gave it to his second born son ‘Shem,’ who was born when Noah was 502 and Shem is the older brother of Japheth. Now, the Holy Spirit had to transfer the spirit of the first born (Ham) to the body of the second born (Shem).

The Book of Jubilees 11: 10; reveals that Terah, the father of Abraham and Sarah was born in the Hebrew year of 1806 AM, then in verse 14 of the same chapter it is written; that in [1870 A.M.] Terah took to himself a wife, and her name was ’Edna, the daughter of ’Abram, the daughter of his father’s sister. And in the seventh year of this week [1876 A.M.] [When Terah was 70, Edna bare him a son, and he called his name Abram, by the name of the father of Abraham’s mother Edna; for he had died before his daughter had conceived a son. 10 years later Terah sired a daughter to another woman other than Edna.

The daughter of Abraham’s father ‘Terah,’ who was the high priest in the Chaldean temple in Ur and who died at the age of 205, was Sarah, who was 65 when she, with her half-brother Abraham, who was 75, left their 145 year old father in Haran, with his other son “Nahor,” and they took with them their nephew ‘Lot,” the son of Haran, the brother of Abraham, who died while trying to save the gods of wood and stone in the temple of Ur, which had been set afire by Abraham. They moved into the Land of Canaan which was the legal inheritance of Shem and his descendants.

Because of a severe drought in the land of Canaan, the Holy Spirit moved Abraham to take Sarai into the land of Egypt where they told everyone that she was the sister to Abram, which she was, or rather his half-sister. The King saw the beautiful one from the north and took her as his wife.

Sarah would have been between 65 and 70 when she was taken to wife by the King of Northern Egypt, who genuinely believed her to be the sister of Abraham, which in fact she was. Abraham was treated very well by the King, and he became a very rich man during the unspecified period that the King of Northern Egypt was united with Sarah the sister wife of Abraham.

The many gifts that the King bestowed on Abraham included flocks of sheep and goats, cattle, donkeys, slaves and camels. Because the Kings semen had been received into the body of Sarah, and even though she had never bore a ‘SON’ to him, the two had become one and certain genetic characteristics of the King of the land of first born would manifest themselves in any future child that might be conceived in the womb of Sarah.

After being visited with terrible diseases and catastrophes that the Holy Spirit of the Lord had sent on him and his people, the King, who like Abraham, believed in the one God, Creator of heaven and earth, was made aware of the cause of his disaster and sent for Abraham and cried out to him, “What have you done to me? Why didn’t you tell me she was your wife? Why did you tell me she was your sister, and let me take her as my wife? [WIFE, their union had been consummated]. Here is your wife, take her and get out!” The King then gave orders to his men, so they took Abraham and put him out of the country, together with his wife and all the wealth that he had accumulated while a guest of the poor betrayed King, who had his men obliterate all evidence of the beautiful one from the north.

Then, when Sarah who, apparently had been unable to ever carry a pregnancy to its full term, was told by one of the visiting men/angels, that she would become pregnant by Abraham and bear to him the son of God’s promise, she laughed at the thought of a woman of her age falling pregnant.

Those men whom Abraham fed, on the fresh bread baked by Sarah, with cream, milk and the meat of a chosen fat tender calf, were the messengers of God.

The Holy Spirit later moved Abraham to travel down south to Mamre, which was in the territory of the King Abimelech, where again Abraham told Sarah to say that she was his sister, which in fact she was, as she was the biologic daughter of Abraham’s biological father, but not of his mother. [See Gen 20: 12.]

Coveting the great wealth of Abraham and believing that by taking his aged sister Sarah, he might then share in her brother’s fortune, Abimlech, who believed her to be the sister of Abraham, had Sarah taken and placed in his Harem. The Lord then struck all the women in the Harem with a terrible disaster and caused the pregnant women in the harem to miscarry and made it impossible for any of the women to fall pregnant and have children.

Obviously, the best of the natural drugs that were known to increase fertility and reduce the chances of natural abortions would have been administered to all the women in the Harem including Sarah.

Then, one night in a dream, the Lord revealed to Abimelech that Sarah was the wife of Abraham and warned him of the dire consequences that would befall him if she were not returned to her husband. The very next morning after the dream, Abimlech gave Sarah back to Abraham with one thousand pieces of silver as proof to everyone that Sarah was innocent and had not been touched during the period of time that she had spent in the Harem.

Abraham received gifts of sheep, cattle and slaves from this king also.

Genesis 20: 18; After that, Abraham prayed for Abimelech and God healed him and his household and the women in his Harem could once again fall pregnant and have children.

Owing to the workings of the Holy Spirit, Sarah at the age of 90, was then to fall pregnant to her 100 years old brother and was able to carry the pregnancy to its full term and Isaac was born, in who was the genetic inheritance of first born through his mother’s unification with the seed of the King of Egypt the land of the first born ‘Ham,’ and Abraham rejoiced to see the child of God’s promise according to the workings of the Holy Spirit.

190 years after the birth of Isaac, and 340 years after the promise=covenant of God to Abraham, that he would give to him the entire land which was occupied by the descendants of Canaan, the sons of Jacob whose name was changed to ‘Israel,’ and who was the second born son of Isaac, the second born son of Abraham, who were the descendants of Shem the second born son of Noah, were taken into the Land of Egypt=Ham, where, after interbreeding with the descendants of Ham for 215 years, the Lord then killed all of the first born sons of the Egyptians: and 430 years to the very day from when God had made his first covenant with Abraham, (See Gal 3: 17), the Light of Egypt went out, as Israel, in who, now, was the spirit of first born and the chosen of the Lord ‘Who I Am,’ was called out of Egypt; “I will call my son out of Egypt.”

To be continued.
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2022 10:54 pm
@The Anointed,
Continued from previous post.

Concerning the great miraculous events that occurred before, during and after the exodus of the Hyksos Kings who initially controlled much of Egypt but were driven back northward to the vicinity of their capital in the Nile River delta, the land that Joseph, who was given by the King, the rulership of all Egypt, gave to his father’s family, “The Israelites,’ where they cared for their livestock, and the livestock of the then King of Egypt.

From ‘The World Book Dictionary,’ (Hyksos) “A succession of six foreign rulers of Egypt—from about 1730 B.C. to about 1570 B.C; Shepherd Kings.” --- And from the Encyclopedia Britannica, ‘Hyksos’, invaders who were also called the Shepherd Kings, who in the time of “King Tutimaios” entered Egypt and took possession of it ‘without striking a blow’ and it is said here that Josephus the historian, identifies them with the Israelites, etc.

Genesis 41: After Joseph had revealed to the king that his dreams were a prophecy telling of a seven-year period of plenty, which would be followed by a seven years period of severe drought, Joseph is made Governor of all Egypt, and all Egyptians were commanded by the King to obey him. The King removed his royal ring with its engraved seal and put it on the finger of Joseph. He was given the second royal chariot and a guard of honour who went ahead of him crying out, “Make way, make way.” And the King said: I am King, but no one in all of Egypt shall so much as lift a hand or a foot without Joseph’s permission.

He gave Joseph an Egyptian wife, Asenath, the daughter of the High priest of Heliopolis, who prophesied that if ever the bones of Joseph left Egypt, the LIGHT of Egypt would go with him. For that reason, a permanent guard was set up to keep watch over the tomb of Joseph, in order that no one could remove the mummified body of Joseph.

During the seven years of plenty, Joseph gathered a percentage of the Egyptian grain crop as a tax, which was stored in silos throughout Egypt. In the early stages of the great seven-year drought, the Egyptians had to buy their grain from Joseph, when their money had all gone, they traded their possessions and livestock, after which, they were forced to sign their land over for grain in order to survive.

Genesis 47: 20-21. Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for the king. Every Egyptian was forced to sell their land, because the famine was so severe; Joseph made slaves of all the people from one end of Egypt to the other, ‘without striking a blow.’

The Hyksos warriors were described as bowmen and cavalrymen wearing the cloaks of many colours, much like the cloak of many colours that was worn by Joseph the son of Israel and the first governor of the kingdom of the Hyksos kings, of who it is said in Genesis 50: 23; that he lived to receive the children of Machir the son of Manasseh into the family. And in Judges 5: 14, it is written that the commanders of the army came down from Machir, of who it is said in Joshua 17: 1; that Machir was the firstborn son of Manasseh, the first born of Joseph, and that he was a military hero, and the father of young Gilead.

Machir, who was a military Hero during the reign of the Shepherd Kings, was long dead by the time of the Exodus.

Gilead the first born of Machir would have been welcomed into the family by Joseph, and presumably, the funeral procession of Young Gilead who is thought to have died childless beside his father ‘Machir’ in a war against the people of the country that would later carry his name, ‘The land of Gilead’ which land was allocated to the descendants of Machir after the exodus.

The funeral procession of Gilead would have been led by his great grandfather Joseph, and buried in his own tomb, which was to be later placed under a permanent guard against tomb robbers, because the high priest of Heliopolis had prophesied that if ever the bones of Joseph left Egypt, the LIGHT of Egypt would go with him.

After the Exodus of the shepherd kings, and the removal of the mummified remains of Joseph, by Moses, which remains were to be taken to Shechem and buried there in the land of Israel as per Joseph’s last wish, the Egyptian Guards would have been removed, and any grave robbers who were later confronted with the opened sarcophagus’ of Joseph and his wife in the empty tomb, would have assumed that others had beaten them to the treasures that the tomb of Joseph would have contained, and would have left empty handed, not realizing, that in a sealed chamber at the back of Joseph’s tomb, was the mummified remains of the young prince of the Hyksos dynasty, with all its wonderful treasures.

Kathleen Kenyon, a most respected archaeologist dug at Jericho over the seasons between 1952 to 1958, her results were confirmed in 1995 by radiocarbon tests, which dated the destruction of Jericho to 1562 BC (Plus/minus 38 years) with a certainty of 95%.

The radiocarbon tests which dated the destruction of Jericho to 1562 BC (plus/minus 38 years) with a certainty of 95%, would mean that Jericho fell somewhere between 1562 and 1524 BC, according to her findings, and 1545 B.C., the date of the Exodus, would make 1505 B, C., as the true date of the fall of Jericho, which was forty years after the Exodus, very close to Kathleen Kenyon’s results, which had only a certainty of 95%.

Having revealed that the historical date for the Exodus contradicts the religious date for the same event, which is said, by the religious authorities of the Roman church of Emperor Constantine, to have occurred over 200 years later in the 13th century, I believe that we should first reconcile this controversy before moving on to the supposed miracles that are said to have occurred before, during, and after the Exodus, of the Israelite shepherds from the land of Egypt.

To be continued.


The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 27 May, 2022 03:20 pm
@The Anointed,
Continued from previous post.

Quote:
Having revealed that the historical date for the Exodus contradicts the religious date for the same event, which is said, by the religious authorities of the Roman church of Emperor Constantine, to have occurred over 200 years later in the 13th century, I believe that we should first reconcile this controversy before moving on to the supposed miracles that are said to have occurred before, during, and after the Exodus, of the Israelite shepherds from the land of Egypt.


In Galatians 3: 17; Paul says; “What I mean, is that God made a covenant with Abraham and promised to keep it. The Law that was given four hundred and thirty years later, (That is 430 years after God’s covenant/promise with Abraham) cannot break and cancel God’s promise.”

“Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you. 2 And I will make of you a great nation, and your descendants will inherit that land,” this was the first covenant/promise that God made with Abraham.

The Roman OT, and the English Hebrew bible, both state in Exodus 12: 40; that the children of Israel were in the actual land of Egypt for 430 years to the day, Whereas the Septuagint, a Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible by 70 Jews in Alexandria some 300 years B C E, from which translation Jesus and his apostles taught, in Exodus 12: 40 reveals that the sojourning of the children of Israel, while they sojourned in the land of Egypt AND THE
LAND OF CANAAN
, was 430 years. And it came to pass, after the 430 years, all the forces of the Lord came out of the land of Egypt by night.

Paul was a student of Gamaliel one of the greatest Jewish teachers of those days, and if we accept Paul’s statement, that there was a period of 430 years between the time that God promised to Abraham, all the land that was occupied by the descendants of Canaan, and the exodus, then we must conclude that the children of Israel were only in Egypt for 215 years.

Abraham, who had entered Canaan at the age of 75, 25 years later when he was 100 sired Isaac, who was 60 when his son Jacob was born, and Jacob was 130 when he was reunited with his son Joseph in the land of Egypt. 25+60+130=215. So, we see that there was a period of 215 years between God’s promise to Abraham and the entry of the family of Israel into Egypt, where they dwelt for 215 years before departing 430 years after the covenant/promise was first made with Abraham.

And the reason why there are no records of the Exodus in the time period in which our religious historians have searched and which the bible student, who believe the erroneous statement that the children of Israel were in Egypt for 430 years and must therefore have departed somewhere in the time period of the 1300 B.C, is because the Exodus and the expulsion of the old Hyksos Kings in the 15TH century B.C, are only 3 years apart, the Exodus in 1545 B.C., and the expulsion of the Hyksos 3 years later in 1542 B. C.

But I’ll let the scriptures which reveal the age of the parents of Moses, prove to you that the Israelite could not have been in Egypt for 430 years

Levi was 48 when he went into Egypt and 16 years later his daughter Jochebed was born on the very same day as Ambram/Amram.

30 years later in his ninety-fourth year, his daughter Jochebed, married his grandson Ambram, whose youngest child ‘Moses’ at the age of eighty, led the Israelites out of Egypt.

Roman Old Testament Exodus 6: 20; “Amram married his father’s sister Jochebed, who bore him Aaron and Moses, Amram lived 137 years.”

Hebrew bible Exodus 6: 20; “And Amram took him Jochebed his father's sister to wife; and she bore him Aaron and Moses. And the years of the life of Amram were a hundred and thirty and seven years.”

Exodus 6 : 26-27; These are that Aaron and Moses, to whom the LORD said: 'Bring out the children of Israel from the land of Egypt according to their hosts.' These are they that spoke to Pharaoh king of Egypt, to bring out the children of Israel from Egypt. These are that Moses and Aaron.

If, as the Roman and Hebrew scriptures claim, that the Israelites were in the land of Egypt for 430 years to the day, then the parents of the 80 years old Moses who led the Israelite out of Egypt, who were both born 16 years after Jacob and his family entered Egypt, would had to have been 334 years old when Moses was born, 80 years before the exodus.

Born 16 years after Israel entered Egypt, plus 334 years when Moses was supposed to have been born, plus 80 years after his birth when the exodus occurred, 16+334=350 ----- 350+80=430. Absolutely impossible.

Having now revealed that the Israelites were in the land of Egypt for only 215 years, we will continue with the miracles that occurred around that time.

To be continued.
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 27 May, 2022 06:47 pm
@The Anointed,
@The Anointed,
Quote:
Having now revealed that the Israelites were in the land of Egypt for only 215 years, we will continue with the miracles that occurred around that time.


The fourteenth day of the first month of the Jewish year while in Egypt, which was the first Passover ever, was the day in which all the firstborn sons of Egypt were killed. Around that time the volcanic Island of Santorini or Thira as it is also known, which was situated in the Aegean-sea, on the Anatolian plate, which is subject to the forces of the over-riding African Plate that grinds against the Arabian plate in its Northern migration, exploded with many times the force of Krakatoa, which was a volcanic island that exploded in 1883, and that explosion was heard 5,000 kilometres away, and caused a tsunami that killed at least 36,000 people. It has been estimated that when the island of Santorini exploded, 35,000 kilometres of material was lifted into the stratosphere, and that the explosive force would have created tidal waves of anything up to 130 ft high which would have traveled at speeds of around 150 miles per hour.

A cloud, that turned day into night around 1,500 BC, has been recorded in Chinese history, and would have covered all of north Africa. The African and Arabian plates intersect in a line that runs through the Red Sea and up the Jordan valley through the Dead Sea.

Look at the strange phenomenon that was occurring at the time of the Exodus. The cloud that blanketed north Africa and most of Europe, and turned day into a night so dark that a man was not able to recognise his own brother who was standing at arms-length from him. The rain of sulfuric acid that caused so much crop failure and the death of the livestock which were forced to feed on the polluted pastures, the following series of shock waves along the great rift valley and the fractures in the Sini peninsular which is situated on the Arabian plate, the bulging of the earth’s crust beneath the Red Sea which caused a highway to rise from the waters, with its following tremor when it collapsed and tidal waves that rolled in like two walls of water on either side of where the highway had been.

Wisdom of Solomon 19: 7-8, ‘Then was beheld the cloud that shadowed the camp, and dry land rising up out of what was before water, Out of the Red sea an unhindered highway, and a grassy plain rising out of the violent surge.”

Look even where the Israelites camped on the shore of the Red sea, which was smack bang in the middle of a major coal field in Egypt.

The bulging earth rising from the surging sea before them, pressurized gas screaming from the opening fissures creating towering pillars of fire to burn behind them, a strong east wind blew all that night causing the thick smoke to blind the pursuing Egyptians while lighting up the camp of the Israelites on the eastern side of those wild fires.

All these events were caused from pressures that had been built up over tens of thousands of years and would have occurred in their proper time, irrelevant as too the Israeli situation. Where the miracle lay, was in the fact that an unseen deity of the future, was able, through his prophet Moses, to organise the events leading up to and including the exodus itself at the precise time in history that this cataclysmic event occurred.

In the book “The Wisdom of Solomon, 16” Solomon has much to say about the days of Moses; he speaks of the strange hails that fell from heaven. Burning balls of frozen gases, some with the ability to burn even in water, some which burned with a heat so intense that they incinerated anything they came in contact with, while other hail, burned with a cold fire through which animals could walk unharmed.

Solomon also speaks of the cloud that covered the Israelites in the desert and of the Manna that fell from heaven during the night. According to Solomon, the heavenly covering was a cloud by day and a host of stars by night, (a night sky ablaze with falling balls of burning hail stones). Then concerning the heavenly Manna, he says, “And that which was not injured by fire, [Burning hailstones] simply warmed by a faint sun beam melted away.

Each morning the desert floor was covered with the residue of the melted hailstones, mounds of a flaky cellulose substance, which looked like coriander seed, and would melt and breed worms and stink if left out in the sun, and yet could be preserved when cooked, and tasted like biscuits mixed with olive oils.

Carbohydrates are any of a group of chemical compounds, including sugars, starches, and cellulose, containing carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen ‘ONLY’, [of which there was an ample supply in the cloud from the volcanic explosion] with the ratio of hydrogen to oxygen atoms usually 2 : 1.

Perhaps, if our scientists could simulate the same conditions that occurred in the stratosphere when the island of Thira exploded, they may come up with an inexpensive and environmentally friendly source of food production to feed the starving millions on the earth.

The early Egyptian magicians or scientists, were able to duplicate some of the miracles of God as performed by Moses. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if our magician/scientists of today were able to perform the more mysterious of God’s miracles as seen in the days of Moses, and provide an abundant and cheap source of food to feed the ever-growing population on this earth.

As I have already said, all those things that happened in Egypt at that time, were caused from pressures that had built up over many, many, thousands of years. Where the miracle is found, is in the fact that some invisible entity from some other time dimension, was able to instigate the Exodus, at the precise time that the destructive forces beneath the island of Santorini, were beginning to awake.

Although radiocarbon dating of an olive tree imbedded in lava would appear to indicate a 1600 BCE eruption of Santorini/Thera, that is, if the lava that it was imbedded in was from the actual eruption that devastated the island and its surrounding districts and not from an earlier minor lava flow, there are many archaeologists who still believe that the date is contradicted by findings in Egyptian and Theran excavations.

Buried Egyptian and Cypriot pottery found on Thera were dated to a later period than the radiometric dates for the eruption, and, since the conventional Egyptian chronology has been established by numerous archaeological studies, the exact date of the eruption remains controversial.

Because of all the contradicting evidence, the exact date of the eruption has been difficult to determine. For most of the twentieth century, archaeologists placed it at approximately 1500 BCE, but this date appeared to be too young as radiocarbon dating analysis of that olive tree which was buried beneath “A” lava flow from the volcano on Santorini, indicate that the particular lava flow in which the olive tree was imbedded, occurred between 1627 BCE and 1600 BCE.

But at Tell el Dab'a in Egypt, pumice found at this location has been dated to 1540 BCE, very close to the date of the Exodus and much closer to the traditionally accepted date of Thera's eruption. This matches the composition of the Thera eruption.

To be continued,
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 27 May, 2022 11:44 pm
@The Anointed,
Continued from previous post.
While on the subject of miracles, let’s look at the fall of Jericho, “What a miracle this was,” a blast of the trumpets, a shout from the camp of Israel, and the walls of Jericho which had stood for hundreds and hundreds of years collapsed, that is, except for the section of the outer wall from whose window, Rahab the prostitute had hung a red rope. Or was it a miracle?

Jericho was a double walled city. Within the two walls, ‘the inner and outer walls,’ houses were built, the roofs of those houses formed a rampart behind a low parapet, which surrounded the city, from where a clear view of the country side could be observed. Joshua, the commander of the Israelite invaders, sent two men into the city to spy it out and gather information, those spies stayed in the house of Rahab the prostitute, and when the King of Jericho discovered that the spies were staying in the house of Rahab, he sent his men to order her to bring the spies out, but Rahab had hid them on her roof and she told them that two men had spent the night in her house, but they had left the city early that morning, and if the men would hurry they still might be able to catch them.

After the king’s men had left, Rahab revealed to the spies that the entire city was terrified of the Israelites, they had heard of the mighty wonders performed by the Lord who led them out of Egypt, and of the wars that they had won in their 40 years of wandering, she then made an agreement with the spies, that if they would guarantee the protection of her entire household, she would help them to escape.

When the spies agreed to protect her household, she planned to lower them down the outer wall of her house in a basket, which was the outer wall of Jericho, and the spies told her to hang the red rope used to lower them down, out of her window in the outer wall of Jericho, and no one in that house would be harmed.

Was it some great miracle that when the walls of Jericho collapsed, only that section of the wall in which the house of Rahab was built, remained standing?

Jericho, was built close to the fault line where the African tectonic plate grinds against the Arabian plate in its northern migration, and would have suffered and survived many earth tremors, surely the sound of trumpets blasting and the shouts of the Israelites could not do, that which the earth tremors had been unable to do and bring down the walls of Jericho? In fact, it is believed that it was either the flooded Jordon River, or an earth tremor that caused a landslide up north of Jericho around the town of Adam, which dammed the Jordon River long enough for the Israelites to cross over on dry land.

Joshua 3: 14-16; It was harvest time, and the river was in flood. When the people left the camp to cross the Jordan, the priests went ahead of them, carrying the Covenant Box. As soon as the priests stepped into the river, the water stopped flowing and piled up, far upstream at Adam, the city beside Zarethan. The flow downstream to the Dead Sea was completely cut off, and the people were able to cross over near Jericho.

How did Joshua know the exact day when to cross the Jordon, who was it who told him?

The Wall of Jericho is the oldest city wall discovered by archaeologists anywhere in the world, and it is built of undressed stones. Knowing from the scriptures, that people in those days who were under siege in a walled city surrounded by enemy troops, would dig a hole through the wall and attempt to escape in the darkness, or in the case of Jericho, remove a stone in the outer wall.

For forty years the Israelite shepherds with all their livestock wandered like nomads through the wilderness, having plenty of meat and dairy products, but not staying in one place long enough to plant and grow grain, and for their daily supply of carbo-hydrates, they relied on the manna that fell from the overshadowing Cloud of Debris trapped in the upper stratosphere, which cloud was caused by the explosion of the Island of Santorini.

It was for this reason that they always remained under the cloud, when the cloud remained stationary, they set up camp and remained in that campsite until the cloud began to drift. They would then break camp, loading their tent and all their gear onto their beasts of burden and follow the cloud until it remained stationary once again.

It was harvest time when they reached the Jordon which was in full flood, and yet they had crossed the river on dry ground; Joshua 5: 1; All the Amorite kings west of the Jordan and all the Canaanite kings along the Mediterranean Sea heard that the LORD had dried up the Jordan until the people of Israel had crossed it. They became afraid and lost their courage because of the Israelites. It’s all in the timing and being foretold of the future events.

After they had crossed the Jordon on dry land, all the young men who had not been circumcised during the forty years of wandering were then circumcised at Gilgal and spent some days resting until their wounds healed. Joshua 5: 10-12; While the Israelites were camping at Gilgal on the plain near Jericho, they observed Passover on the evening (Which is the beginning) of the fourteenth day of the month. The next day was the first time they ate food grown in Canaan: roasted grain and bread made without yeast. The manna stopped falling then, and the Israelites no longer had any. From that time on they ate food grown in Canaan.

To be continued

The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 28 May, 2022 04:02 pm
@The Anointed,
Continued from previous post.

Quote:
It was harvest time when they reached the Jordon which was in full flood, and yet they had crossed the river on dry ground; Joshua 5: 1; All the Amorite kings west of the Jordan and all the Canaanite kings along the Mediterranean Sea heard that the LORD had dried up the Jordan until the people of Israel had crossed it. They became afraid and lost their courage because of the Israelites. It’s all in the timing and being foretold of the future events.


After they had crossed the Jordon on dry land, all the young men who had not been circumcised during the forty years of wandering were then circumcised at Gilgal and spent some days resting until their wounds healed.

Joshua 5: 10-12; While the Israelites were camping at Gilgal on the plain near Jericho, they observed Passover on the evening (Which is the beginning) of the fourteenth day of the month. The next day was the first time they ate food grown in Canaan: roasted grain and bread made without yeast. The manna stopped falling then, and the Israelites no longer had any.

From that time on they ate food grown in Canaan.

Did the cloud dissipate, or did the Israelites then cease to follow it as it drifted further to the north east?

Then came the time for the conquest of Canaan, which land was the rightful inheritance of the descendants of Shem, as was allocated to Shem by his father Noah, (But that’s another story) and the conquest would begin with the city of Jericho. If the Amorite kings and the Canaanite kings along the Mediterranean Sea became afraid after they heard that the Lord had stopped the flow of the Jordon for the Israelites to cross, they would become terrified when they heard of the blood bath that occurred in the city of Jericho.

For six days, the Israelites marched around the city once a day, blowing their trumpets, before returning to their camps which were set up around the city, while the terrified inhabitants prepared their escape plans, wondering when the attack would come.

Then on the seventh day, things were different, instead of returning to camp after the first circuit, they continued a second circuit, then a third, and a fourth, a fifth, a sixth; Surely this was it?

Then at the close of the seventh circuit the trumpets sounded a blast that echoed across the plains, and the shouts of the entire Israelite camp could be heard for miles around. The terrified inhabitants in the houses built into the double walls, kicked out the stones they had loosened for their escape route, the structural integrity of the outer wall was compromised, and even the slightest of earth tremors would bring the walls crashing down.

That is, except for the section of the wall with the red rope hanging from its window, in which house, Rahab, her parents, brothers, sisters and even her servants were secure in the knowledge that they would not be harmed, even though every man, woman, child and animal in the city would be butchered.

Judges 3: 1-2; So then, the LORD left some nations in the land to test the Israelites who had not been through the wars in Canaan. He did this only in order to teach each generation of Israelites about war, especially those who had never been in battle before.

Right from the word ‘GO’, the Lord was preparing his chosen son “ISRAEL” for the war to end all wars, which war will usher in the thousand years of peace under the rulership of Christ Jesus our chosen king and High priest.

Numbers 24: 14-19; Balaam said to Balak, “Now I am going back to my own people, but before I go, I am warning you what the people of Israel will do to your people in the future.” Then he uttered this prophecy:

“The message of Balaam son of Beor, the words of the man who can see clearly, who can hear what God is saying and receive the knowledge that comes from the Most High. With staring eyes I see in a trance a vision from Almighty God. I look into the future, and I see the nation of Israel.

A king, like a bright star, will arise in that nation. Like a comet he will come from Israel.

He will strike the leaders of Moab and beat down all the people of Seth. He will conquer his enemies in Edom and make their land his property, while Israel continues victorious. The nation of Israel will trample them down and wipe out the last survivors.”

This is the war to end all wars, as spoken of by the prophet Isaiah.

Isaiah 63: 1-6; “Who is this coming from the city of Bozrah in Edom? Who is this so splendidly dressed in red, marching along in power and strength?”
“It is the LORD, powerful to save, coming to announce his victory.”

“Why is his clothing so red, like that of someone who tramples grapes to make wine?”

The LORD answers, “I have trampled the nations like grapes, and no one came to help me. I trampled them in my anger, and their blood has stained all my clothing. I decided that the time to save my people had come; it was time to punish their enemies. I was amazed when I looked and saw that there was no one to help me. But my anger made me strong, and I won the victory myself. In my anger I trampled whole nations and shattered them. I poured out their lifeblood on the ground.”

See Revelation 3: 21 and 2: 26-28; The man Jesus who was given divine glory by the God of our ancestors, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, see act 3: 13; is now incontestably divine and sits in the throne of out heavenly Father and invites all those who like himself, are able to win the victory, to sit beside him in that heavenly throne, and to those who win the victory, who continue to the end to do what HE wants, HE will give the same authority that HE received from our Father: HE will give them authority over the nations, to rule them with an iron rod and to break them to pieces like clay pots. HE will also give them the morning star.

The war to end all wars as revealed through the prophet Zechariah: Zechariah 14: after which the Lord will take his rightful throne and rule for a thousand years, after which the heavenly radiation will destroy all physical life forms of this planet.

To be continued.
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 28 May, 2022 08:11 pm
@The Anointed,
Continued from previous post.

Miracles.

Quote:
Matthew 14: 25-31; BETWEEN THREE AND SIX O’CLOCK IN THE MORNING, Jesus came to the disciples, walking on the water. When they saw him walking on the water, they were terrified. “It's a ghost!” they said, and screamed with fear.


Did Jesus really walk on water as recorded in the scriptures? By faith, I believe he did. Is it possible for a physical human body to stand on water? By faith, I believe that even Peter stood on the waters until he lost faith and began to sink.

I do not attempt to create some metaphor for these stories to make it appear that those events did not really happen, but are simply stories to explain what I think they were meant to explain. Of course, if I did create my own metaphorical story, my metaphor, would be different from the many other metaphors created by others, who, unlike myself, refuse to take the stories literally.

(Let me here Repeat) Quantum physicists discovered that so called physical atoms are made up of vortices of energy that are constantly spinning and vibrating, each one radiating its own unique energy signature.

If you observed the composition of an atom with a microscope you would see a small, invisible tornado-like vortex, with a number of infinitely small energy vortices called quarks and photons. These are what make up the structure of the atom. As you focused in closer and closer on the structure of the atom, you would see nothing, you would observe a physical void. The atom has no physical structure, we have no physical structure, physical things really don’t have any physical structure! Atoms are made out of invisible energy, not tangible matter.

Pioneering physicist Sir James Jeans wrote: “The stream of knowledge is heading toward a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like ‘A GREAT THOUGHT’ than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter, we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter. (R. C. Henry, “The Mental Universe”; Nature 436:29, 2005)

Have you ever become so excited that you felt as though you were floating on cloud nine?

Why did the terrified and excited Peter, (whose body was made up of Swirling vortices of energy,) after having taken a few steps on the water, then doubt that it was possible and began to sink?

The higher the speed of any apparent physical object the more opposition will be offered by the water’s surface tension against the movement.

The velocity reached by an average 80 kg human body falling from 2,000 feet is about 66 meters per second. That is the velocity through air, not through water.

What happens to an 80 kg human body falling head first at 66 meters per second when it hits water? It will be like hitting a concrete path that one walks on.

The surface tension of the water will bend as that person’s head cracks open like a thin shelled egg, while the vertebrae are crushed together, and only when the body is slowed down to a certain speed, will that body be able to enter the water.

Even though the required data to explain this phenomenon of walking on water is not as yet available to the world, I believe that one day science will prove that it is possible, under certain conditions, for a human body of swirling vortices of energy to stand on water.
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 29 May, 2022 02:08 am
@The Anointed,
How many of those who were brought back from the brink of death by Jesus, are still walking the earth in their physical bodies, and how many of the thousands and thousands who are brought back to life by our doctors of today, will not end up dying the physical death?
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 29 May, 2022 09:41 pm
@The Anointed,
Continued from previous post.

And what of the miracles of feeding 5,000 men, and the other of feeding 4 thousand men

Mark 8: 15-21; “Take care,” Jesus warned them, “and be on your guard against the yeast of the Pharisees and the yeast of Herod.”

They started discussing among themselves: “He says this because we haven't any bread.”

Jesus knew what they were saying, so he asked them, “Why are you discussing about not having any bread? Don't you know or understand yet?

Are your minds so dull? You have eyes — can't you see? You have ears — can't you hear? Don't you remember when I broke the five loaves for the 5,000 people? How many baskets full of leftover pieces did you take up?”

“Twelve,” they answered.

“And when I broke the seven loaves for the 4,000 people,” asked Jesus, “how many baskets full of leftover pieces did you take up?”

“Seven,” they answered.

“And you still don't understand?” he asked them.

Do You understand what Jesus was attempting to tell his disciples?

12 baskets full of leftover pieces after feeding 5,000 on 5 Loaves, and 7 baskets full of leftover pieces after feeding 4,000 people on 7 loaves.

Philip from Bethsaida who ruled the territory in which those miracles were performed, played a part in the multiplication of the loaves and the fishes, and in medieval art Philips symbol was loaves, See John 6: 1-7 where Jesus puts Philip to the test.

To be continued.
0 Replies
 
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 04:07:13