@FreedomEyeLove,
Nozzle, the word is Nozzle, if you want to ound glib in print, at least understnd the structures of the words you use.
I dont know about all the kinds of paper that were used. I DO know tht the bisulfite and chloro sulfitic pulping were quite common for book qnd comic pqpers. The Ti pulp would be shiny qn ws used for the higher end mags qnd stuff like Nat Geo.
My company hd series of contracts for environment management (protect river and ground water) that could be affected by pulping. My clients included P&G, Glatfelter (Who hd the Nat Geo contract for mag paper) and Westvaco paper.
I dont need to know everything nor did I say I did, You are the only on trying to act smarter thn he is.
1..Oxygen is NOT a contaminant,(IT IS NOT THE PROBLEM) its a ubiquitous gas conjouring up about 19% of our atmosphere along with N2 at roughly 78%
2. The chemiiwtry of paper is the problem, just like iron rut and copper corrodes, it is chemically reacting with atmospheric gases. You can either keep the tmophere away from the heaply pulped paper, OR, you can use a totally different process to produce the pqper.
Most comics in the 40's and 50's were done in a clro sulfitic mush which created great amounts of water pollution and acidic media. Many higher end paper mfrs used the TiO2 or cotton fibre pulping (More expensive but lasts for centuries if kept from high humidity.
Oxygen i a problem to your life by your definition. So, when we tlk about "Theres yyer problem" dont make believe that nature i at fault for creaming yer comic books.
As far as my collection that I INHERITED from my older cousin. I think I mentioned the complete sets of comics I hqd. I didnt have everything EC produced(thats a claim you just made and its a lie), I have but a few covers Only a few , ). I listed them earlier.
You seem to enjoy making up **** about what others supposedly said and hoping someone will believe yer BS. I can see why you like Plump, yer both bigass deceptionistas.
. 
