@maxdancona,
maxdancona wrote:
I think you are arguing just to argue.... but I will continue to play along
- I am pretty sure that the average age of school employees is significantly higher than that of Home Depot employees.
- I am certain that contact that Home Depot employees have with individual customers is less than being trapped with 25 students at a time for 50 minutes a class for a day of 5 classes.
- I believe the real problem is a basic human psychology leading to a flawed logic.
"Schools (or protests) are worthy causes ... so they can't be bad. The virus is bad. Therefore the virus won't impact worthy things like schools and protests."
Actually I wasn't arguing for the sake of it - I was pointing out the falseness of your statement.
I agree with the statement of the teachers - they are the ones in the most danger when it comes to schools - why I suggested that they and all of us make sure they take extra precautions. Same as anyone that would be exposed to others while they need to go to work similar to those say working at Home Depot.
I am also of the opinion that if someone is older or has an underlying health issue - they should not be working if it brings them out in the public - those people should be the ones getting extra unemployment. But you would need to prove you fit a risk category.
I have seem employees at Home Depot - they hire from college kids to semi-retired. Not too much different in ages of teachers. Teachers a bit older meaning they are out of college but as young as 24 and into their 70s. Not much different. At least at the ones in my community and of course home depot is an example of the average joe out working in the community under these circumstances.
And no - I am basing the lack of children getting covid because of actual statistics. Many of which are from AAP - a respected health organization in place to do the best for the health of children.
What are you basing this on "- I believe the real problem is a basic human psychology leading to a flawed logic. --"Schools (or protests) are worthy causes ... so they can't be bad. The virus is bad. Therefore the virus won't impact worthy things like schools and protests"
I never once thought or stated that - because one thing is good the virus would avoid you; never said that or alluded to it or even basing school openings on it - I am basing it on statistics and simple common sense - I stated it is better for kids to be in school for their HEALTH - not because school is good. AAP believes it is best for their overall HEALTH due to the statistics that show children are significantly less likely to contract this virus.
Here is a thought - more kids get the regular flu and die from it - should we close the schools when flu season occurs? And even those that get a flu vaccination can still get the flu. I understand that to the overall society, covid is more dangerous, but to children the flu is. And where are children together most in close quarters - schools or daycares- but yet we do not close them during even a particular deadly flu season.
We do not do that - so why would we close for something that is less dangerous to children?
Logically you protect those that need protecting. The elderly and those with underlying health issues.