0
   

A "weird questions in semi-earnest digression"......

 
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 08:32 pm
Pet, see, pets, see, pet, see, pets, see...
say that fast four times...
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 08:48 pm
Why?
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 08:58 pm
Why not?
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 09:01 pm
because
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 10:19 pm
Grrrrrrr....
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 10:23 pm
for the Sound of it, of course...
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 10:34 pm
Still - why?
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 10:39 pm
See, pdog mentioned Pepsi, oh, hwy, why, hwy, do I have to explain this, the word Pepsi sounds like Pet see. And you, wabbit, have demanded play and digression.
Do you wish desistment?
No, I presume you don't.
You wish motivation.
Probably.
Can I explain why you need to say this four times?
Of course not.
But you would probably have some small picoline of nirvana if you did. However, that is yourrrrrrrrr choice if you don't want that particular nirvana segment.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 11:01 pm
'Tweren't the nirvana, 'twas the ratiocination.

Pepsi, eh.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 11:29 pm
What was ratiocinating about saying it four times? Or more subtlely, two things twice in non sequence.

Twas the call to action, no doubt.





Pets, where are my pets?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 11:32 pm
Lol - not YOUR ratiocination!

'Twas my desire to understand why petsee was a diverting thing to say!
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 11:52 pm
It's a simple sound alike, dlowan. If you weren't diverted, please fill in your own blank.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 11:56 pm
Osso - blimey!

I was simply saying I had no memory of the Pepsi.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jun, 2005 12:08 am
Would I say such silly words out of the blue? (don't answer that)
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jun, 2005 12:11 am
Lol - well, no.




But I would.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jun, 2005 12:11 am
I thought this was a fling toward the old digression threads, with word riffs et al. I am called for imbibing and failure to ratiocinate - when I play with words.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jun, 2005 12:21 am
I gather I am extra sensitive. I will try though to make my words more serious and will never again ratiocinate if I can help it. No promises re imbibing, as that is generally irrelevant.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jun, 2005 12:22 am
Ah - it calls for memory - and these damn paginations and post separations are not tres conducive, n'est ce pas?
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jun, 2005 12:26 am
It's true, I find myself posting re five posts back, sometimes, though I thought I was timely on that one.

My kerfluffle is fluffed and I'll settle down. But don't ask me to ratiocinate.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jun, 2005 03:50 am
Cheesebuggy, cheesebuggy, cheesebuggy ! ! !

Pet-see, pet-see, pet-see ! ! !
0 Replies
 
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 12:21:20