5
   

Present Time Does Not Exist

 
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Sep, 2019 03:42 pm
@livinglava,
Smile
Elsewhere you wrote
Quote:

Assuming that there is only one reality and every form of language and concept humans have developed refers to some perception/experience of reality,...

Unfortunately that example of your naive realist assumptions tends to disqualify you as a serious contributor to ontological 'discussions' (ie. those concened with 'existence' as raised by the OP). This should eliminate your need to 'guess' about my refusal to engage.
livinglava
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Sep, 2019 06:07 pm
@fresco,
fresco wrote:

Smile
Elsewhere you wrote
Quote:

Assuming that there is only one reality and every form of language and concept humans have developed refers to some perception/experience of reality,...

Unfortunately that example of your naive realist assumptions tends to disqualify you as a serious contributor to ontological 'discussions' (ie. those concened with 'existence' as raised by the OP). This should eliminate your need to 'guess' about my refusal to engage.

First, you bringing this into this thread from another thread is hijacking the thread to argue over a paradigmatic issue.

Second, if you think believing in multiple realities is par for the course in discussing time, then you are in your own reality with that and there's no point trying to reach you in that reality.

You can take whatever you want seriously in your reality, then, but it will have nothing to do with what is worth taking seriously in anyone else's reality, i.e. because yours is separate, at least in your own mind/beliefs.
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Sep, 2019 12:14 am
@livinglava,
I doubt whether you understand the concept of 'paradigm', since you certainly have no clue about the paradigm of 'differential observer reference frames' well understood by all physicists, and elegantly extended by Rovelli.
In short, you are out of your depth both here, and apparently, on many other threads, judging by your 'thumbs score'.

Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Sep, 2019 03:02 am
@Beaker17,
Yes what there is is no conscious subject in the present, but that is old news...yet another stone in the free will bullshit talk!
0 Replies
 
livinglava
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Sep, 2019 02:30 pm
@fresco,
fresco wrote:

I doubt whether you understand the concept of 'paradigm', since you certainly have no clue about the paradigm of 'differential observer reference frames' well understood by all physicists, and elegantly extended by Rovelli.
In short, you are out of your depth both here, and apparently, on many other threads, judging by your 'thumbs score'.

If you weren't so rude, I would have discussed your Rovelli ideas with you, but since you seem to already have decided what you think of my thoughts before I post them based on my 'thumbs score,' I guess it was better that we ended the discussion before it started anyway.
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Sep, 2019 03:06 pm
@livinglava,
Wink
0 Replies
 
livinglava
 
  2  
Reply Sat 21 Sep, 2019 07:40 am
Christmas and birthdays = present time.
0 Replies
 
Jewels Vern
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Oct, 2019 10:59 am
@Beaker17,
Word games.

If your feet touch the ground you have not jumped yet. If your feet do not touch the ground you have already jumped. So does that mean that "jump" is meaningless?

You need to get a fresh grip on reality.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Evolution 101 - Discussion by gungasnake
Typing Equations on a PC - Discussion by Brandon9000
The Future of Artificial Intelligence - Discussion by Brandon9000
The well known Mind vs Brain. - Discussion by crayon851
Scientists Offer Proof of 'Dark Matter' - Discussion by oralloy
Blue Saturn - Discussion by oralloy
Bald Eagle-DDT Myth Still Flying High - Discussion by gungasnake
DDT: A Weapon of Mass Survival - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/07/2019 at 01:09:35