@maxdancona,
maxdancona wrote:This is another example of you pushing a subjective opinion and insisting it is an unquestionable fact. You are setting up your own definition of what a "neo-nazi" in such a way that you can choose who fit in that designation.
This is silly. Someone who goes around falsely accusing Jews of imaginary atrocities, and who tries to rally people to harm Jews because of those imaginary atrocities, is very much a neonazi.
If the neonazi tries to obfuscate by directing their false accusations of imaginary atrocities "at Israel" instead of "at Jews", that changes nothing.
maxdancona wrote:I am questioning your unquestionable fact. QED.
The facts speak for themselves.
maxdancona wrote:You do this a lot Oralloy, confusing your own opinions with facts.
No I don't. And you can't point out any examples of me having done so.
maxdancona wrote:It isn't just you... some liberals are saying that Trump supporters are neo-nazis. You and them both call people neo-nazis... but you have very different views about who fits in that group.
I imagine that some neonazis do support Trump, but there are plenty of Trump supporters who are not neonazis.
maxdancona wrote:That is the definition of "subjective".
Leftists deny reality all the time. This does not mean that facts are subjective. It just means that leftists often deny reality.
maxdancona wrote:I wish that ideologues on both sides would stop referring to their political opponents as Nazis. But that is just my subjective opinion.
It is highly unlikely that I will label someone a neonazi if they aren't falsely accusing Jews (or Israel) of imaginary atrocities.