6
   

A Sincere Apology

 
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 May, 2019 05:10 pm
@BillRM,
You're the one who said Jefferson wanted the ambassador's wife to expose herself.

He's the one treating her as a sex object.

I was just seeking greater clarity, what you meant exactly.

izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Thu 30 May, 2019 05:13 pm
@BillRM,
They moved to America because there was no rationing over there, and more British men had lost their lives.

We were in the war from the beginning, remember, we didn't turn up half way through.

Our culture has resulted in two female prime ministers.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 May, 2019 06:15 pm
@izzythepush,
Yes I remember your false claim that US did not loss people during ww2 until we was attack at Pearl harbor.

Disregarding the people we loss protecting the convoys full of war fighting materials we was sending you.

But then WW2 was your and the French fault in any case due to not wishing to grant peace terms that Germany could live with after WW1 completely disregarding the US suggestions of must more reasonable terms.ot

Footnote there was indeed rationing in the US.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 01:15 am
@BillRM,
So you've lost the argument about Jefferson and you move on to WW2.

Jefferson's behaviour sounds like Caligula, he used to force Senator's wives to do similar things .

American losses prior to Pearl Harbor were a drop in the ocean compared to those suffered over here. And you were doing it for your own benefit, you didn't want the Nazis moving on from Europe to America.

The rise of the Nazis has more to do with the Depression, American isolationism and funding by prominent Americans like Henry Ford than appeasement by France and Britain.
mark noble
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 09:54 am
@Montezuma III ,
Who are you apologising to?
Nobody cares, except you.

It is your conscience that is in turmoil.

Nobody else's.

Seriously! Get over 'yourself'.

Would you like a link - For self-gettingoverones'selfness'?
0 Replies
 
mark noble
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 09:56 am
@BillRM,
Pearl harbour was ALLOWED - stop kidding yourself - Wanna link?
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 10:13 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

So you've lost the argument about Jefferson and you move on to WW2.

Jefferson's behaviour sounds like Caligula, he used to force Senator's wives to do similar things .

American losses prior to Pearl Harbor were a drop in the ocean compared to those suffered over here. And you were doing it for your own benefit, you didn't want the Nazis moving on from Europe to America.

The rise of the Nazis has more to do with the Depression, American isolationism and funding by prominent Americans like Henry Ford than appeasement by France and Britain.


Nonsense............an once more there was every indication that the Jefferson and Hemings many repeat many many decades long relationship was of the nature of a secret common in law marriage then anything else.

She was in France along with her brother for years an both of them reach agreements concerning the terms of coming back to the US where they would once more be consider slaves.

I know you hate the idea that you are having a problem with the painting of Jefferson as a slave holder forcing himself upon a poor and simple slave girl he own but as far as can be found out at this distant in time it was two adults reaching the best possible agreements they could have given the laws and customs of the time.

Poor Jefferson falling in love with his dead wife half sister but never being able to have an open relationship with her due to her skin color. footnote in my own lifetime it was still illegal for a white man to be married to a black woman in the southern states an doors was broken down and men and women drag away to jail for being in such a marriage.

There are many things you can attack Jefferson for but not him falling in love with both a slave of his and his dead wife half sister is not one of them.

Let see summing up he have known children only by two women one his wife and one his dead wife half sister. Both Sally and her brother knew they was free under French laws and both reach agreements with Jefferson over returning to the US where the laws consider them slaves an less then full humans.

In that time period is was not uncommon for a man to loss his wife an afterward take another woman as a wife but Jefferson did no such thing even those his standings in the US was about as high as a man could reach and he would had been a real prize for any woman of high family standing to claim as a husband.


BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 10:26 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:


https://www.monticello.org/thomas-jefferson/jefferson-slavery/thomas-jefferson-and-sally-hemings-a-brief-account/

Years after his wife’s death, Thomas Jefferson fathered at least six of Sally Hemings’s children. Four survived to adulthood and are mentioned in Jefferson’s plantation records: Beverly, Harriet, Madison, and Eston Hemings. Sally Hemings worked for two and a half years (1787-89) in Paris as a domestic servant and maid in Jefferson’s household. While in Paris, where she was free, she negotiated with Jefferson to return to enslavement at Monticello in exchange for “extraordinary privileges” for herself and freedom for her unborn children. Decades later, Jefferson freed all of Sally Hemings’s children – Beverly and Harriet left Monticello in the early 1820s; Madison and Eston were freed in his will and left Monticello in 1826. Jefferson did not grant freedom to any other enslaved family unit.

Look Closer at The Life of S
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 10:37 am
@BillRM,
You refuse to understand coercion or power dynamics. People stay in cults or with an abusive partner because they're wholly controlled, when one person is owned by another that dynamic is increased exponentially.

You can mitigate Jefferson's behaviour as much as you want but it doesn't change the fact that he was a slave owner and racist.

Quotations from lickspittle historians don't change the facts either. Monticello.org, the website that promotes said rapist/slave owner, is hardly unbiased. Next you'll be posting links from Monsanto "proving" roundup is completely innocuous.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 10:39 am
@mark noble,
Pearl Harbor is a place name, therefore both words are capitalised and the American spelling is used.

I give the Americans just as much grief when they misspell the Labour Party.

Has anybody ever said yes when you've offered them a link, or have they just kept quiet hoping you'll go away?
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 12:02 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

You refuse to understand coercion or power dynamics. People stay in cults or with an abusive partner because they're wholly controlled, when one person is owned by another that dynamic is increased exponentially.

You can mitigate Jefferson's behaviour as much as you want but it doesn't change the fact that he was a slave owner and racist.

Quotations from lickspittle historians don't change the facts either. Monticello.org, the website that promotes said rapist/slave owner, is hardly unbiased. Next you'll be posting links from Monsanto "proving" roundup is completely innocuous.


Nonsense he was a good and even outstanding man of this time period an if you are stating that no woman can grant herself to a man if there is a large power imbalance then once more Bill Gate must had rape his now wife or if you do not like that example General Eisenhower must had rape his English driver Summersby during WW2.

Poor Eisenhower was even thinking of divorcing his wife so he could married the female driver an asked permission from General George Marshall to divorce his wife to marry Summersby.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 12:11 pm
@BillRM,
Neither Bill Gates nor Eisenhower owned the ladies in question.

You've just admitted he turned a blind eye to the terror, now you're claiming he was good and outstanding.

Giving a free pass to mass murder is not something good men do.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 12:32 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

Neither Bill Gates nor Eisenhower owned the ladies in question.

You've just admitted he turned a blind eye to the terror, now you're claiming he was good and outstanding.

Giving a free pass to mass murder is not something good men do.


Sorry Hemings was living as a free woman for years in France and in France Jefferson did not own her at all.

She had no problem in setting up conditions for Jefferson to agree to before she would be willing to move back to the US also.

Slaves do not demand conditions from his or her owner.

Next we was a new an weak nation an in no conditions to interfere with France reign of terror either. Hell we was lucky to get Paine release before they cut off his head.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 12:44 pm
@BillRM,
Don't talk rot, your concept of free is meaningless.

A black enslaved woman living in post revolutionary France would have had an easy time at all. Look at Napoleon's treatment of Haiti if you're in any doubt about France's attitude towards black people.

BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 01:07 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

Don't talk rot, your concept of free is meaningless.

A black enslaved woman living in post revolutionary France would have had an easy time at all. Look at Napoleon's treatment of Haiti if you're in any doubt about France's attitude towards black people.




You are full of it as she had learn the language an with her background of taking care of Jefferson children there is no reason to think that she could not have gotten a good paying job.

Next she was not a slave in France an it was the French government that set off an explosive in Haiti by declaring that blacks was now free in their empire that resulted in the killing of most whites on the island that could not reach the safety of ships. At the time Haiti white sugar plantations was needing to ship in 30 thousands blacks to replace the ones they had work to death yearly so it damn hard to feel bad for the whites on the island.

Yes later Napoleon did try to re-gain control of the island an gotten his ass handed to him. Such happening did not reverse the freeing of slaves in the French empire.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 01:56 pm
@BillRM,
The treatment of Haiti, post Napoleon was disgraceful.

That's the reality.

You show no understanding of coercion, or of the social realities of the time.

BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 02:18 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

The treatment of Haiti, post Napoleon was disgraceful.

That's the reality.

You show no understanding of coercion, or of the social realities of the time.




You do know they did beat the French an became an independent non slave nation so what the hell are you talking about?

Napoleon troops war crimes during the fighting before they was driven off the island perhaps?

Quote:


https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/haitian-independence-proclaimed

Two months after his defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte’s colonial forces, Jean-Jacques Dessalines proclaims the independence of Saint-Domingue, renaming it Haiti after its original Arawak name.

In 1791, a slave revolt erupted on the French colony, and Toussaint-Louverture, a former slave, took control of the rebels. Gifted with natural military genius, Toussaint organized an effective guerrilla war against the island’s colonial population. He found able generals in two other former slaves, Dessalines and Henri Christophe, and in 1795 he made peace with revolutionary France following its abolishment of slavery. Toussaint became governor-general of the colony and in 1801 conquered the Spanish portion of island, freeing the slaves there.

In January 1802, an invasion force ordered by Napoleon landed on Saint-Domingue, and after several months of furious fighting, Toussaint agreed to a cease-fire. He retired to his plantation but in 1803 was arrested and taken to a dungeon in the French Alps, where he was tortured and died in April.

Soon after Toussaint’s arrest, Napoleon announced his intention to reintroduce slavery on Haiti, and Dessalines led a new revolt against French rule. With the aid of the British, the rebels scored a major victory against the French force there, and on November 9, 1803, colonial authorities surrendered. In 1804, General Dessalines assumed dictatorial power, and Haiti became the second independent nation in the Americas. Later that year, Dessalines proclaimed himself Emperor Jacques I. He was killed putting down a revolt two years later.

izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 02:41 pm
@BillRM,
An independent Black nation, treated like **** by the surrounding White nations.

Quote:
In July 1825, King Charles X of France, during a period of restoration of the monarchy, sent a fleet to reconquer the island. Under pressure, President Boyer agreed to a treaty by which France formally recognized the independence of the nation in exchange for a payment of 150 million francs. By an order of 17 April 1826, the King of France renounced his rights of sovereignty over Santo Domingo, and recognized the independence of Haiti

The enforced payment to France reduced Haiti's economy for years, and Western nations continued to refuse formal diplomatic recognition to Haiti. Both of these problems kept the Haitian economy and society isolated. Expatriates bankrolled and armed opposing groups.

Haiti borrowed heavily from American and German banks at extremely high interest rates to repay the debt. Although the amount of the reparations was reduced to 90 million in 1838, Haiti did not finish repaying the debt until 1947. By 1900, 80 percent of the country's gross domestic product was being spent on debt repayment.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haiti#State_of_Haiti,_Kingdom_of_Haiti_and_the_Republic_(1806–1820)
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 03:29 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

An independent Black nation, treated like **** by the surrounding White nations.

Quote:
In July 1825, King Charles X of France, during a period of restoration of the monarchy, sent a fleet to reconquer the island. Under pressure, President Boyer agreed to a treaty by which France formally recognized the independence of the nation in exchange for a payment of 150 million francs. By an order of 17 April 1826, the King of France renounced his rights of sovereignty over Santo Domingo, and recognized the independence of Haiti

The enforced payment to France reduced Haiti's economy for years, and Western nations continued to refuse formal diplomatic recognition to Haiti. Both of these problems kept the Haitian economy and society isolated. Expatriates bankrolled and armed opposing groups.

Haiti borrowed heavily from American and German banks at extremely high interest rates to repay the debt. Although the amount of the reparations was reduced to 90 million in 1838, Haiti did not finish repaying the debt until 1947. By 1900, 80 percent of the country's gross domestic product was being spent on debt repayment.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haiti#State_of_Haiti,_Kingdom_of_Haiti_and_the_Republic_(1806–1820)


LOL far far better then slavery with a death troll of around 30 thousands a year an life is hardly fair now or then.

Next it is hardly surprising given the white slave owning population on the island being wipe almost to the last men women and children that the southern US slave states was not in a hurry to have the US recognition them.

Now what the hell does all the above have to do with Sally Hemings being free to make her life as a free woman in France if she had care to do so instead of returning to the US with Jefferson?

Sorry she was not Jefferson slave as long as she was in France an she knew it feeling free to set conditions of her returning to the US with Jefferson.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 May, 2019 04:23 pm
@BillRM,
It's still appalling. Wiki also said many free black Americans "encouraged" to emigrate came back because it was too harsh.

You have no concept what those people went through you smug sod.
0 Replies
 
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 03:27:23