0
   

Medicare for All: How would that work exactly?

 
 
Reply Sat 11 May, 2019 10:24 am
Medicare for all is an attractive idea if you want everyone to have health care and you don't want it to cost a lot. Of course that assumes that the costs won't skyrocket as Democrats open the pandora's box of taxing the rich to pay for it.

Assuming the best case scenario that low-cost medicare-for-all is achievable, how would it work exactly? If everyone pays the same amount for healthcare through medicare, then would all doctors and health care professionals be paid according to government-determined salary schedules?

In short, would medicare keep costs down by telling everyone in the health care business how much they can make and prevent them from making more by selling their services to private payers with more to spend?

Fiscally disciplining the medical and pharmaceutical sectors would be a challenge, to say the least; so how would it work? How would you prevent wealthy doctors and others from quitting the industry, investors from pulling out of previously-lucrative pharmaceutical and medical-supply industries?

Is it really possible to keep the medical industries working for everyone by means of government control or will they somehow escape such control and re-establish the right to work for better-paying customers? And finally, are those better-paying customers not powerful enough to obstruct medicare-for-all in order to maintain their special privileges as top-priority clients of the best health-care professionals?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 276 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
Jewels Vern
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 May, 2019 05:19 pm
Here's the way it works. When most people pay their own medical bills, the doctor sits down with the patient and they discuss options and costs and decide what to do. When most people have insurance, that discussion does not take place. Tests and second opinions that would otherwise have been optional are automatic. The doctor hires more staff to fill out the insurance forms and keep extensive records. The doctor has to have the latest equipment to be sure his diagnoses are legally defensible. Everybody knows the bills are covered, and services are assumed to be competent. All of this, the extra tests, the second opinions, the documentation, the equipment, has to be paid for, and the cost goes on the patient's bill. The insurance company's only concern is that charges are necessary and reasonable.

Please notice that I have not suggested any form of deception. All of this is normal, honest, and unavoidable. Increased medical costs are automatic when most people have insurance.

But normal market forces are still at work. Demand is limitless, but services are scarce. In a normal market, demand is controlled by costs. When that restraint is removed some other method must be found to keep demand equal to supply. One way to limit demand is to make patients wait. When there aren't enough doctors to treat people as fast as they come in, patients must wait. Those that can't or won't wait go away. Travel to a treatment center has the same effect. When the market is controlled by costs, people who really need treatment can get it by paying the cost. When the market is controlled by some other method, individuals are prevented from making their own decisions about what they really need. They can only get treatment by waiting, or by obtaining some sort of official approval or professional reference, that is to say, by political influence.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Health Care Prices High to Market Insurance - Discussion by livinglava
Health Care Compromise - Discussion by livinglava
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Medicare for All: How would that work exactly?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 02:39:43