Shewolf--
The story said:
Quote:Gonzalez, 37, was arrested a few blocks away and charged with misdemeanor criminal damage to state-supported property.
You wrote:
Quote:Strange.. most kids who spraypaint on walls, carve thier names into things etc are let go.
Since this " stain" was labled a -Virgin Mary- shrine, he gets the max that can be given with a graffitti charge...
hmm.
This guy was 37 years old--chronologically not a "kid". The underpass is "state supported property". I'm guessing--only guessing, mind--that to get to the provocative stain he had to wade through/kick aside/fling aside candles and flowers--possibly into the roadway, creating a traffic hazard.
Apprehended a few blocks away? He was probably seen and reported by at least one passing motorist with a cell phone.
Why do you think he's being unfairly singled out? Would you suggest that no charges be filed?