@Immediatehelpplease,
Note that fantasists are fond of citing Tesla in support of crackpot ideas. Contributors to mainstream science have a fertile imagination, not all of which results in functional applications. Newton , for example, wrote more on alchemy than he did on physics, and even Pythagoras is noted for banning the eating of beans believing they were connected with human embryos. And Einstein, who contributed to the dismissal of one of Tesla's meanderings (the aether), clung to anti quantum theory ideas, despite the weight of evidence against him.
I suggest you take a step back from the simplistic lay concept of 'science in pursuit of
truth' and consider instead the philosophical pragmatists view that ' science is about
what works in terms of prediction and control'. Indeed, if you have the time, research 'theories of truth'as a sobering alternative to speculative pseudoscience.