A smiling happy crotch will land you in jail

Good to know. Looks I'll have to change my weekend plans, or at least cancel that trip to Stamford, Connecticut.

maybe, if you took the smiling face OFF your bananna, you might not get into any legal trouble.
maybe the face was the legal loop hole the police needed.

Or maybe a frowning face. They can't really arrest someone with a frowning crotch, now can they? I mean, the sight would be more sad than obscene that way.

What law criminalizes the stuffing of a toy banana into one's tight pants? Is it the resulting bulge that is illegal or other people's reaction to observing the bulge? How does the public display of a bulge in one's pants breach the peace?

If the sight of a bulge in someone's pants is grounds for arrest . . . I dare say that many men out there are committing crimes.

I hope the bulge police do everything in their power to get those men who dance around in tights off our public stages. You know . . . during those sissy ballet performances . . . .

I'd be all right with that. Damn sissies...

I was wondering that as well.
If it is just the buldge that is -law breaking- then any man can be arrested.

Or maybe it was the referrance to sexual organs?
If that is the case, then all married couples, dating people, teenagers, elderly, and any other sexualy active person should be arrested. They have said things that were in referrance to someones sex organs at one time or another right?



I dont know the whole story.. this is all I found. I am hoping there is some merit to this legal charge that was filed against him. But if it is just because he had a buldge... im with you on your question as to why this breaches peace Debra. As i said, if that is the case, then any man can be arrested.

Yes definitely. Due process of law abhors vague and ambiguous laws. If it's the public display of a bulge in one's pants that renders an individual subject to arrest and criminal prosecution, then the law ought to speak with clarity. How big does the bulge have to be before it breaches the peace?

ROFL

disgusting, unlawful bulges


What do you think? Legal or illegal bulge?



Now this guy is trying to cover up his crime. He is trying to conceal the illegality with his hands . . . but the bulge is there nevertheless.

ROFLMAO!!!!

if he is in tights its illegal..
if he is in jeans, he should call me!!!!!!!!!!

But . . . how can we know for sure regardless of whether the criminal suspect is wearing tights or jeans?

It might be a naturally occurring bulge or it might be an illusion perpetrated upon us through the conniving use of a pair of rolled up socks or a toy banana.

Ah . . . but then we get into the criminal aspects of false advertising.

Hmm

and, how exactly do you PROVE that there is a foreign object in the defendants pants?
Reach right in there and check it out I suppose?
BUT- isnt that sexual harassment?
how about molestation?
He cant DROP his pants to show you because that would be exposure/flashing.. wich is another charge..

( Poor man was probally just joking around with people and someone got upset, called police and screamed sexual harassment )
>sigh<

I think this poor guy who got his kicks out of wearing a toy banana in his tight pants was a more likely candidate for the looney bin than a jail cell.

LOL

But . . . I would LOVE to be his lawyer. This is the kind of case that would make writing the motion to dismiss and brief in support of motion a very entertaining endeavor.

Would you have him display said 'buldge' in the court room?
LMAO!!

I think I would ask the prosecutor to demonstrate the illegality. LOL

Then . . . I would rip off my suit jacket and display a tight shirt covering two bowling balls held in place over my chest by a very large bra.

Then . . . I would ask if the law not only prohibited the toy banana in the prosecutor's pants, but also the bowling balls under my shirt. . . . ROFL

That would be a start . . . .

Hmmmmm. I would ask that the law be declared unconstitutionally vague as applied to the case of the banana in the pants because we don't know where to draw the line between legal and illegal, but illusory body part enhancements. Would a pair of rolled up socks be okay, but not a toy banana? What about a football? If I wore a football in my pants, would I be breaking the law? Would a padded bra be okay, but not bowling balls? Would a penile implant be okay? Would breast implants be okay? or just NOT breast implants that would breach the peace?

Due process of law requires that criminal laws provide people with adequate notice of what conduct will subject them to criminal penalties. Is the breach of peace statute written with sufficient clarity that a person would be on notice that stuffing an object underneath his clothing that results in an apparent bulge would be grounds for his arrest?

Hmm...
this sounds like a script for Saturday night live...
haha!

Man Gets 20 Days in Toy Banana Flashing



The really NUTTY part about the smiley-faced-toy-banana-stuffed in the crotch case, is if the defendant violates his probation, he can go to jail for 4 1/2 years.

So if it falls out can he be pinched for a breach of the codpeace?

King Charles II would have never gotten out of jail . . .


Good King Charles
Thy scepter and rod
For 'tis said the latter
Is of a size with thy cod


That piece of doggerel is atrributed to the Earl of Rodchester . . .

(And the historical rumor is that Charlie was hugely endowed . . .)