0
   

Should Discussions Be Inclusive or Exclusively Like-Minded?

 
 
Reply Wed 5 Sep, 2018 11:30 am
Partisan factionalism is arguably at an all-time-high currently. It is often impossible to discuss issues with people who oppose your POV, because their primarily goal is to shoot down POVs that don't fall within the range of what they consider acceptable.

Given such hostility, it is better to have discussions that are inclusive of all POVs and attempt to engage in civil discussion despite differences; or is it better to just divide discussions so that like-minded thinkers discuss topics constructively without disruptive POVs 'trolling' and otherwise undermining the quality of discussion?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 290 • Replies: 7

 
jespah
 
  3  
Reply Wed 5 Sep, 2018 11:38 am
@livinglava,
Or is it better to not look at everything in black and white terms?
livinglava
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 5 Sep, 2018 11:52 am
@jespah,
jespah wrote:

Or is it better to not look at everything in black and white terms?

That is too vague to be relevant unless you explain what you mean by it specifically in relation to this topic.
coluber2001
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Sep, 2018 12:10 pm
@livinglava,
I suppose the voice should be an inquisitive one just like the voice of your post. If we could somehow seek a collective solution rather than pose as experts we could all get along. But then, when people first run into A2K, the title is "Ask an Expert", and so we often adopt defensive attitudes and act like experts on everything.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Thu 6 Sep, 2018 12:05 am
@livinglava,
That's straight-forward. The thread title implies a dualistic choice--inclusive (a vaguely described term) or like-minded. Jespah's question is very much to the point.
livinglava
 
  0  
Reply Thu 6 Sep, 2018 12:56 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

That's straight-forward. The thread title implies a dualistic choice--inclusive (a vaguely described term) or like-minded. Jespah's question is very much to the point.

I wouldn't recommend making it dualistic unless you want to discuss that aspect of it. If you want to discuss how inclusion and exclusion are not exhaustive categories, you could do that. It would be quite interesting to read.
Setanta
 
  0  
Reply Thu 6 Sep, 2018 04:42 pm
@livinglava,
With your categories being so vague, it is not interesting to see you dismiss Jespah's very pointed observation.
livinglava
 
  0  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2018 01:06 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

With your categories being so vague, it is not interesting to see you dismiss Jespah's very pointed observation.

Advice: don't approach a thread as a game-architecture to navigate. My 'categories' aren't goal posts for you to play against. You have to think about this issue and post your thoughts.
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Should Discussions Be Inclusive or Exclusively Like-Minded?
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/07/2025 at 01:00:29