1
   

The limit of Physics

 
 
Ray
 
Reply Fri 4 Mar, 2005 12:26 am
Will we be approaching the limit of new attainable knowledge for Physics in the next century or two?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 866 • Replies: 11
No top replies

 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Mar, 2005 12:47 am
Nope.
0 Replies
 
g day
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Mar, 2005 07:04 pm
I think gaining more sophistcated models only shows you have more complexity and variability to analyse. Can you honestly see with the knowledge we possess at present this ending in 100 - 200 years?
0 Replies
 
physgrad
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2005 07:00 pm
Re: The limit of Physics
Ray wrote:
Will we be approaching the limit of new attainable knowledge for Physics in the next century or two?


Why on earth would you think that? As most phys majors would say, we were hardly done with newton when along came einstein. I believe the classical limit has been reached, but as most astrophysicists and particle physicists (the two opposite ends of our size spectrum) would tell you, there are eons of study ahead. I will say this however, in a couple of hundred years, the amount of physics you'll need to study before reaching a stage where you can conduct practical research, might just be horribly extended to beyond the limits of human patience. :wink:
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2005 11:02 pm
Brandon9000 wrote:
Nope.


Will you and I be alive to see the next big revolution?
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Mar, 2005 01:20 pm
rosborne979 wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Nope.


Will you and I be alive to see the next big revolution?

I hope so. It would be soooo exciting.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Mar, 2005 01:28 pm
Brandon9000 wrote:
rosborne979 wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Nope.


Will you and I be alive to see the next big revolution?

I hope so. It would be soooo exciting.


I agree. I find the elegance of relativity so compelling that I am anxious to "see" the next level of natural physics. I just hope it's sufficiently intuitive for me to be able to comprehend. I'm lucky that the basic idea of relativity can be envisioned without math. But my fear is the as we move forward, dimensional mathematics may be the only way to grasp the next level of physics, and I'm not sure I'm up to that.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Mar, 2005 01:30 pm
rosborne979 wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
rosborne979 wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Nope.


Will you and I be alive to see the next big revolution?

I hope so. It would be soooo exciting.


I agree. I find the elegance of relativity so compelling that I am anxious to "see" the next level of natural physics. I just hope it's sufficiently intuitive for me to be able to comprehend. I'm lucky that the basic idea of relativity can be envisioned without math. But my fear is the as we move forward, dimensional mathematics may be the only way to grasp the next level of physics, and I'm not sure I'm up to that.

Sooner or later we will discover some new physics with practical implications as great as the discovery of electricity and electromagnetism. I would love to be alive to see it.
0 Replies
 
Ray
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Mar, 2005 07:55 pm
Quote:
Why on earth would you think that?

Because a lot of things could happen within a century or two. Honestly, Einstein's theory came out of nowhere, although there is a similar postulate of relativity being developed by other scientist, Einsten did not look at these datas. Right now is a very crucial point in Physics I think. All it takes is someone to look at something from an angle, and theorize a groundbreaking theory, although I know I'm stretching it here. Easier said than done.

Quote:
As most phys majors would say, we were hardly done with newton when along came einstein. I believe the classical limit has been reached, but as most astrophysicists and particle physicists (the two opposite ends of our size spectrum) would tell you, there are eons of study ahead. I will say this however, in a couple of hundred years, the amount of physics you'll need to study before reaching a stage where you can conduct practical research, might just be horribly extended to beyond the limits of human patience.


As long as they just skip right to the most modern physics instead of doing all the classical as a requirement, I would be grateful. Laughing
0 Replies
 
Jazzfreak13
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Mar, 2005 08:39 am
Im sure they'll claim to be doing something even if they're not.
0 Replies
 
paulaj
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Mar, 2005 08:49 am
rosborne979 wrote:
I'm lucky that the basic idea of relativity can be envisioned without math. But my fear is the as we move forward, dimensional mathematics may be the only way to grasp the next level of physics, and I'm not sure I'm up to that.

Could someone explain what "natural physics" are. No math?

How do scientists experiment with natural physics, or, what kind of experiments do they work with?
0 Replies
 
Ray
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2005 12:53 am
I guess it will be aeons until we get to a complete theory, but I always wonder what would happen when all of that could be empirically known is already known.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Evolution 101 - Discussion by gungasnake
Typing Equations on a PC - Discussion by Brandon9000
The Future of Artificial Intelligence - Discussion by Brandon9000
The well known Mind vs Brain. - Discussion by crayon851
Scientists Offer Proof of 'Dark Matter' - Discussion by oralloy
Blue Saturn - Discussion by oralloy
Bald Eagle-DDT Myth Still Flying High - Discussion by gungasnake
DDT: A Weapon of Mass Survival - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The limit of Physics
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 10:39:28