605
   

NeoPets Riddles (Lenny Conundrums) and Answers Here

 
 
judesalb
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jan, 2006 09:23 pm
I got a number by multiplying each by the same number. The oposite number is that number plus 1. That gave me the answer. Does this make sense???
0 Replies
 
bullfrog75
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jan, 2006 09:27 pm
either give us the snswer or leave the boards
0 Replies
 
judesalb
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jan, 2006 09:28 pm
I thought we we not supposed to give the answer.
0 Replies
 
emilyandtheepiphanies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jan, 2006 09:30 pm
Look at what is opposite each number. Multiply the smaller of the pair by 3 and add 1. That's how I worked it out, anyway.

Of course, I may be wrong.
0 Replies
 
bullfrog75
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jan, 2006 09:30 pm
thats what this board is for
0 Replies
 
judesalb
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jan, 2006 09:32 pm
757
0 Replies
 
xcpetdatruth
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jan, 2006 09:32 pm
emilyandtheepiphanies wrote:
Look at what is opposite each number. Multiply the smaller of the pair by 3 and add 1. That's how I worked it out, anyway.

Of course, I may be wrong.


Right. This one was VERY easy.
0 Replies
 
elybelly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jan, 2006 09:32 pm
Umm....No
Bullfrog, this board is NOT for answers, despite it's name. We're all here to try to work out the answer together. If you're not here to try to work it out for yourself, you don't belong here. And just to get you to leave.....The answer is 457.
0 Replies
 
stg821
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jan, 2006 09:35 pm
sorry but in my last post i said it was 7, 8, 9, or 10. i was stupid and didn't realize till now that it could be many other numbers.
0 Replies
 
idelhigh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jan, 2006 09:50 pm
I came to the same solution as you but i can't decide on the answer.

Should we multiply that last number or should we divide?
I'd be inclined to divide but i get a long decimal value, should i round?
0 Replies
 
judesalb
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jan, 2006 10:02 pm
I multiplied the last number. If you divide it is not a whole number
0 Replies
 
emilyandtheepiphanies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jan, 2006 11:15 pm
If one divides that number by 3, one will have a long decimal value as the answer. One should note that all numbers with a known value are WHOLE numbers. Logically, one would assume that the missing number is therefore also a whole number and so would multiply and not divide.
0 Replies
 
rosey
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jan, 2006 11:31 pm
Lol I got 2547 lol I am soo confused
0 Replies
 
rosey
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jan, 2006 11:34 pm
how are you coming up with 757 or 457 Im not getting it.... I tried X'ing all # buy 3 and I tried to divide.... yeah just not getting it

I am sooo horrible at these things ugh
0 Replies
 
markr
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2006 12:49 am
268 = 3 * 89 + 1
934 = 3 * 311 + 1
520 = 3 * 173 + 1

757 = 3 * 252 + 1
252 = 3 * 83.666... + 1
0 Replies
 
judesalb
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2006 01:00 am
Ergo the answer 757.
0 Replies
 
markr
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2006 01:01 am
That's one possibility.
0 Replies
 
Milarepa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2006 11:08 am
One of each pair is prime
757 is prime in this case...
0 Replies
 
jaymon
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2006 02:24 pm
I disagree that the answer is 757

Looking at the physical placement on the wheel, the lesser of the numbers in each pai is on the same half of the wheel.
173, 311, 89 are on the same half. multiply each by 3 and add 1 to achieve the numbers on the othe half of the wheel 268, 934 and 520

Note also that the lower number in each case is the prime.

the answer of 757 seems correct, but it doesn't entirely follow the pattern set by the existing pairs.


I don't know if neopets didn't pay attention to the fact that the lower of the numbers in the pairs was prime, and I don't know of they paid attention to the fact that the lower of the numbers in the pais was on the same falf of the circle, but those facts seem too obvious to be over looked.
0 Replies
 
rickyinyer
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2006 03:25 pm
hmm...
Perhaps it doesn't matter if its a prime number, maybe its just a coincidence that they are all primes apart from the last one, they could just be trying to throw people off, there was so many correct answers for the last one, so maybe this is one were you just have to go with what you can, it might not be a prime number but why does it matter? There is no flaw in the math that i can see when its a prime or not?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Lenny Conundrum 464 - Question by jreneearias
Lenny Conundrum #463 - Discussion by barkie
Lenny Conundrum (wed) DECEMBER 8 2010 - Question by Joanneexoxo
answers - Question by qftcu1
Lenny Conundrum 354 - Discussion by hippiegirl101
lenny conundrum 4/16 - Question by punkd4life3
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/29/2025 at 04:32:18