Reply
Sat 7 Oct, 2017 08:01 pm
The following sentence is taken from a British newspaper:
Prime Minister Theresa May yesterday said that the crime rate in her country has diminished dramatically over the past few years.
My question is this:
Why, in the second clause, do we have "has diminished" and not "had diminished"?
Thank you.
The journalist who wrote the story used 'has' in error. He or she should have used 'had'. If the direct speech used the present perfect continuous, the reported speech should contain the past perfect continuous, e.g. I am the Prime Minister. I say to a reporter: "I have killed three men in the last week". The report should say "The Prime Minister said that he had killed three men in the last week".
http://www.ef.co.uk/english-resources/english-grammar/tense-changes-when-using-reported-speech/
@centrox,
My golly Pete, Cen, but so wish your Prof weren't Latin. Or is it 'wasn't'
@dalehileman,
dalehileman wrote:
My golly Pete, Cen, but so wish your Prof weren't Latin. Or is it 'wasn't'
It isn't Latin any more. And weren't is fine.
@centrox,
I see Cen that it's now Chinese
...or is that Japanese
@dalehileman,
I guess some people just hate English grammar lessons. que sera sera...
@cicerone imposter,
Thank you Cis, encouraging in my old age