0
   

BE caught with your pants down or GET caught with your pants down

Forums: Esl
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
paok1970
 
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2017 05:16 am
Is it "to BE caught with your pants down" or "to GET caught with your pants down"?

If both are possible, do they mean the same thing?

If so, which is more INFORMAL?

Thank you.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 311 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
centrox
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2017 05:21 am
Get is less formal.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Does " has not grappled with" refer to "has not made efforts to answer"? - Question by oristarA
Does "by a factor of more than 10" mean "10 times more"? - Question by oristarA
a wearied security guard argued with residents desperate to check on their apartments as a dog...? - Question by oristarA
Is the expression "yet from front, mediocre" okay? - Question by oristarA
Failed to get the use of "what" here: in terms of some model what I am going to describe... - Question by oristarA
Which one sounds better? - Question by kuben123
Is the sentence right? - Question by Fantastic Monster
alternative way - Question by Nousher Ahmed
What is the meaning of "shbang" in these sentences? - Question by kathy79
Failed to understand the meaning of "only" here - Question by oristarA
English tense - Question by jonnywalker00
 
  1. Forums
  2. » BE caught with your pants down or GET caught with your pants down
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 02:02:43
▲ ▼