0
   

Stuck FOR words vs. Stuck ON words

 
 
Reply Sun 2 Jul, 2017 10:34 pm
Is it "to be stuck FOR words" or "to be stuck ON words"?

If both are possible, do they mean the same thing?

If not, when should I use each of them?

Would you please give me a couple of examples?

Thank you.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 392 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
layman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Jul, 2017 12:28 am
@paok1970,
paok1970 wrote:

Is it "to be stuck FOR words" or "to be stuck ON words"?

If both are possible, do they mean the same thing?

If not, when should I use each of them?

Would you please give me a couple of examples?

Thank you.


No, they don't mean the same thing, and I don't think either phrasing is common. That said:

You might say you're "stuck for words," when you're not sure what to say and/or how to say it. More common would be "at a loss for words."

You might say you're "stuck on words" if you have a limited vocabulary and are therefore having trouble reading something (or only reading slowly because you keep consulting a dictionary). In this sense you're "stuck" because you can't proceed (at least not rapidly).

They are other possible contexts, too.

In this context "stuck" basically means you're unable to move/proceed because something is keeping you in place.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Stuck FOR words vs. Stuck ON words
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 10:56:09