2
   

is or were

 
 
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2016 10:33 am
In "They have businesses in Hong Kong and other Australian cities", the usage is wrong, unless Hong Kong is an Australian city, which it isn't.

"is" should be "were", right? If not, please explain why.

Thank you.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 2 • Views: 241 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2016 12:57 pm
@tanguatlay,
Right "Were" implies "isn't." Our experts doubtless will explain tech detail and terms
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2016 01:17 pm
Either discuss Hong Kong's actual status:
the usage is wrong, unless Hong Kong is an Australian city, which it isn't.

Or use conditional/subjunctive:
the usage would be wrong, unless Hong Kong were an Australian city, which it isn't.

0 Replies
 
tanguatlay
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2016 08:35 pm
Thanks to both of you.
0 Replies
 
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Nov, 2016 12:58 pm
@tanguatlay,
Tang I'm not sure we've been of a hellavalota help. I'd'a said the sentence was perfectly okay except for an unnecessary comma after "wrong"
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » is or were
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/01/2024 at 01:15:57