Is reality's root goal the creation of itself via the creation of no cause?

Reply Tue 12 Jul, 2016 03:48 pm
Presence could perhaps be interpreted as needing its anti to not be itself in order to exist - in turn making its anti the need of presence to be itself in order to exist.

Presence needs anti to be not anti, and absence needs anti to be anti: in actuality, this would then suggest that absence is not opposed to itself, and presence is self-opposition. Because of this, absence could then be interpreted as having no reason to change, while presence has reason to change (except that it isn't able to be aware of this).

In light of all, could reality's root mission be the present ability to change, but via the reflection of no cause?

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 1,313 • Replies: 2
No top replies

Reply Mon 18 Jul, 2016 06:19 am
A question about a cause asks for a 'reason'-- the question is by its nature causal. So, you really don't understand your own question.
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2016 06:30 am
I understand the goal of resolution, and balances. Nature wants to cease discrepancy, but the means to doing so needs to be created.
0 Replies

Related Topics

Nature of gun laws - Discussion by gungasnake
Reality - thing or phenomenon? - Question by Cyracuz
Atheism - Discussion by littlek
Is Reality a Social Construction ? - Discussion by fresco
Do you See what Eye See?? - Discussion by NoName77
  1. Forums
  2. » Is reality's root goal the creation of itself via the creation of no cause?
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/23/2021 at 03:58:17