@chowbarry,
Dear John, Peter and Sally
:
Thank you for your comments on the work proposal and to my understanding that you all in principle have no objection to
its implementation of the proposal.
(My only other objection is the "and to" which kinda floats. I might've said "for my" but maybe Tes will suggest an even better wording)
To haveFor an in-depth discussion about the details of the work initiated by our technical division, I propose to arrange another round joint site meeting in which all of you, our office's representatives and those from
District
Electricity
Unit
, will be invited to take part
in. Please advise
me which the following sessions best suit you for the meeting:
10 Sep
t
12 Sep
t
15 Sep
t
or if you have alternate meeting date by close of play today.
(Later won't work 'cause I'll be out of touch)
Your sincerely,
BB
(Barry, note two additional carriage returns, while "round joint site meeting" will leave me guessing until I learn how to once more capture OneLook.com; whether round-joint site, round-joint-site or round joint-site; "final round of joint-site meetings or "final round-of-joint-site meetings." Tes, help)
Otherwise well-written, you're to be encouraged. But tell us (or just me) something about yourself: I am
[email protected]
....and apparently don't care who else knows it