Define Morality

@neologist,

Life.... grows.

Anything that does not feed life, is feeding death.

Giving life to death is rather chaotic, dysfunctional, and disorderly.

Death only grows by life given to it, else death would not, nor could not, exist, have life, in and of itself.

Morality feeds Life.

Life feeds that which feeds Life.

Feeding life, at the cost of death, is heroic. This is loving the neighbor.

Life is Love and feeds on love.

That is Morality.

0 Replies

@neologist,

Morality is a schema that attempts to establish the values and behaviour that would ensure the life and welling being of the subjects under its domain. Its proper object should be our common biology and the well being of that biology. All meaning is the property of biological consciousness, thus that consciousness is the creator of a self-interested morality of the body.

0 Replies

@Jasper10,

Atheistic science and philosophy has guessed that good is bad and bad is good and this is an absolute.

You don’t need to define good and bad you just need to be AWARE that the moment rules are introduced it has been defined that good and bad are different.

If there is a need for rules after atheists came to the conclusion that good is bad and bad is good then there was a need for rules before atheists came to the conclusion that good is bad and bad is good.Atheists just weren’t aware of it.

This definitively confirms that the atheists original guess that good is bad and bad is good and this is an absolute,was incorrect.

1 Reply

Once upon a time, piggy read an essay. It’s said that somebody asked Einstein: when will ww3 happen?
Einstein replied: I don’t know what’s ww3. But I am “sure enough” human beings will have to employ wood bar and stone in ww4.
Piggy has no idea whether that author made a joke only…

https://img.zcool.cn/community/01ae635dd385bba8012129e26938db.gif

If somebody is AWARE, he should try to do something meaningful to mankind, rather than try to plague mankind.

0 Replies

I think mankind shoot large amount of neutron into a wasp, if not yet enough, add large amount of Gama ray, to do experiment is moral.

0 Replies

The what coffin box from what CN appeared in PHF in 2020, just trolled and then piggy dead.
https://physicshelpforum.com/threads/the-game-of-match-sticks.16181/post-50071
https://physicshelpforum.com/threads/the-game-of-match-sticks.16181/post-50090
Although piggy was defeated by the what coffin box from what CN in PHF, but it doesn’t mean that what coffin box won out in international scientific community. Piggy really can’t find out in which year that guy won an “Oscar” Prize for physics or for astronomy.呵呵 But if you input Einstein’s name in the search engine, everywhere it would be: Albert Einstein won Nobel Prize for physics in 1921.
Nor it means PHF won out in science. Actually they all lag behind one era now, while UNAWARE of it.

http://img.mp.itc.cn/q_70,c_zoom,w_640/upload/20160913/5bb8fd7180ba4b22b79d8169ce8781dd_th.jpg

Piggy really has no idea whether it’s moral or immoral …

0 Replies

@Jasper10,

Jasper10 wrote:

Atheistic science and philosophy has guessed that good is bad and bad is good and this is an absolute.

"Atheistic science and philosophy" have not no such thing. This absurdity is a figment of your imagination.

Quote:

You don’t need to define good and bad you just need to be AWARE that the moment rules are introduced it has been defined that good and bad are different.

If there is a need for rules after atheists came to the conclusion that good is bad and bad is good then there was a need for rules before atheists came to the conclusion that good is bad and bad is good.Atheists just weren’t aware of it.

This definitively confirms that the atheists original guess that good is bad and bad is good and this is an absolute,was incorrect.

This post is absolute proof that you are a sicko. Get over it. You might be able to offer reasonable input into this discussion if you get past whatever is running you right now.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

Frank,

Your philosophy is floundering.

Good is Bad and Bad is Good is an absolute

That is a possibility

Good is Good and Bad is Bad is also an absolute.

That is a possibility

1 Reply

@Jasper10,

Jasper10 wrote:

Frank,

Your philosophy is floundering.

There is nothing wrong with my philosophy whatever. It is fine...not floundering.

[/quote]
Good is Bad and Bad is Good is an absolute

That is a possibility

Good is Good and Bad is Bad is also an absolute.

That is a possibility [/quote]

You are a master of the irrelevant.

Anything that has not been established as impossible...IS POSSIBLE.

I've mentioned that several times.

1 Reply

Morality - the last refuge of the empathetically challenged.

0 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

Irrelevant, as a possibility you mean?

1 Reply

@Jasper10,

Jasper10 wrote:

Irrelevant, as a possibility you mean?

Jasper, I am just about the only person on A2K who directly talks to you. I think it is about time you took that into consideration.

In any case, our "arguments" are like those of a child in a sandbox. You have an idea or two in mind and will say anything that reinforces those ideas. The "ideas" are about as sophisticated as most sandbox ideas...and are delivered with about the same amount of intelligence as most sandbox ideas are delivered.

Bake your idea for a few more hours...and then come back.

3 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

Baking is a term for when you need a **** but can't get to a toilet meaning you'll have to keep it in, (bake it,) until then.

It still comes out ****, not matter how long it's been baked.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

Frank ..if only you had awareness and a better understanding of consciousness.

I have stated that it is possible that there have always been absolutes whereby good and bad are concerned and rules have always been in place even before man decided to make some up.

I know you can’t disagree with this because your philosophy prevents you from doing so.

So what is the problem?

0 Replies

@izzythepush,

You need awareness Izzy.When and if you find it go back and read your posts.

1 Reply

@Jasper10,

You are the most unaware muppet on the planet.

You need a kick up the arse.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

Calm down Izzy or they will block this one as well.

1 Reply

@Jasper10,

That's your go to riposte, telling others to calm down.

It's stale, and it's the sort of nasty, passive aggressive response that gets threads frozen.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

Sound good advice you got going there out of charity...you are a good person even if extremely stubborn!

0 Replies

http://pic.51ppt.com.cn/public/upload/share/000/000/256/77/49756fbf30bf79e16ad56defa6873c9b41X40u_468x468.jpeg

Human kills donkey, especially “lobotomised” one, and eat its meat. It’s moral.
But a “lobotomised” donkey enjoys the charity of this galaxy while try to do something unfavorable to it, it’s immoral.

0 Replies

Define Morality

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know