you fail to understand that a site that is wrongly placed will still show a trend even if it is not accurate
Unbelievable . So if it gets colder they turn the airconditioners on more which blows more hot air on the measuring instruments which records a hotter temperature . If it is in a car park, how much heat is reflected for what degree of bitumen temperature ? No idea ? You can not get anything from bad data, not even a trend . Your lack of science tells me you never went to Big Pre-School, you know, University .
Balloon readings - these are used to measure winds primarily, temperature is recorded wherever the wind goes, not where you want to measure temp .
When did these start in any significant numbers ? Was it the 1970's when Global Warming Thuggees first appeared ?
This will be good . When did these start and who compiled the data ?
Time of ice out on lakes
What is that ? Shorthand in the hope no one calls you on it ?
Dates when birds migrate north and south
What efforts were made to eliminate any other reason ? How was it proved Global Warming was the cause and only cause ?
location of species
??? Ahhh....I see....science....wowwww !!
Oh no please, dont be modest ! Share !
Something that would be statistically unlikely
There's an 80% chance you are educated beyond your intelligence . You know what that means ? The other 20% is impossible ! Totally statistically unlikely !
Rather than deal with ALL of those things you cherry pick less than 10% of the data collection sites that have been pulled out of data in more than one study and there is still warming. The last such study actually showed if you discounted those sites, the warming trend was actually stronger.
Didnt you say the trend going in a biased direction was statistically unlikely ? It sounded like you, full of 'science', bad data and shaky conclusions .