Mr Stillwater
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jan, 2003 09:21 pm
Err. I don't think the addition of a plant that may grow to 250 feet would be a suitable choice. Stick with the smaller pines closer to the shoreline, the wind will tend to keep them low.

As conditions in Boston would be closest to those in NZ:
-Metrosideros excelsa
-Yeogi (Populus alba x glandulosa)
-Juniperus conferta 'Emerald Sea'
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jan, 2003 09:44 pm
Tee hee, Mr.S. I was just offering a variety. Besides, I don't think the Sitka Spruce reaches 250' for about 50 years. If somebody did want a nice big tree, though, it would be a good one. I'm from the Puget Sound area of the Pacific NW and here, we love to have big trees close to the water. They look good. You get your shoreline, then the trees, with a good lawn and some red geraniums... you're set and don't have to think about it again!

To my mind though, a row of Shore Pine, Pinus Contorta, would probably be a better choice.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Feline Leukemia - Contagiousness - Question by CDobyns
A big hound dog killed BBB's little Dolly dog today - Discussion by BumbleBeeBoogie
Tigers and Pigs... - Discussion by gungasnake
Fertilizer - Discussion by cjhsa
The Imaginary Garden - Discussion by dlowan
Informed Consent? - Discussion by roger
Me a cat hater? - Discussion by Craven de Kere
Dressing dogs - Question by TooFriendly112
My pussy getting weaker.. - Question by pearl123
Choosing good dog food? - Discussion by roycovin
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 11/05/2024 at 07:32:40