Relativity of morality

The simple point I am making is that all sciences are generally based upon 0,1...1,0 log principles I.E. BIASED.

Logic says that you have take on board 0,0....1,1 logic as well as a possibility.

As sciences are not adopting this principle they have "HIT A BRICK WALL"...

PRESENCE.....AWARENESS.....CONSCIOUSNESS types are separate and different.

Presence is aware of 0 and 1 consciousness types and their 4 off possible interaction combinations of 0,0...0,1...1,0...1,1

ALL SCIENCES ARE INTERCONNECTED.

I believe that morality is both objective and subjective. Divine command defines morality as "morality is ultimately based on the commands or character of God." By this definition it is objective. Cultural relativism defines morality as "ethical and social standards reflect the cultural context from which they are derived." By this definition morality is subjective. Religion says that morality is defined by God, but all religion started somewhere. When the religion was founded, people decided what was right and wrong based on what their god says. Over time people have decided that what was said thousand of years ago was god's will. Therefore I believe that morality is both objective and subjective.

In a fool’s logic, it might appear odd:
Moral is moral;
Immoral is moral;
Moral is immoral;
Immoral is immoral.

Oh Lord, is it moral or immoral? Logic confused. All based on that fool’s mind.

The “fools” logic if we want to call it that .i.e. the 4 off logic output possibility combinations is just how it is but it does allow for both subjective and objective opinions.

ABSTRACT + ABSTRACT = more ABSTRACT = useless
In the eye of a fool, the whole world is foolish except himself. But strangely, most people in this world can basically distinguish what’s moral what’s immoral except that fool himself.

The “fools logic” is the output of the brain (computer)/ organ.It does it’s best…go easy on it….It’s still an amazing piece of meat…..

The J – 10 virus not only is plotting to plague science but also society and human’s brain.
The most happy guys of course would be the First Order.
haha

There is no such thing as a J-10 virus…..sensible explanations of science has arrived on the scene……that’s all…sensible explanations of science that we can all understand……science that makes sense……..

As all sciences are interconnected …..it makes sense that the brain may function/have similar workings to the cosmos….Even modern day science is starting to make those sort of connections…….nothing new or remarkable about that….

Electromechanical systems are at play in both…period…why wouldn’t they be…

An electromechanical system needs an external power source for it to operate ….period.

The standard scientific model needs amending because it does not account for the above or consciousness …period

There are USD and British pound in this world, again have to be “allowed” / output by fool logic?
呵呵
Have a lovely day.

There are bacteria and virus in this world, again have to be “allowed” / output by fool logic?
呵呵
Have a lovely day.

There is HALF logic possibilities (which modern day science adopts) …..Period …..and there is FULL logic possibilities (which modern day science doesn’t adopt) which is why it’s gravity theory doesn’t work.

You can apply either HALF or FULL logic possibilities to Philosophy as well.

The Cosmos and the Human Brain cater for FULL logic possibilities in their make up.

SELF chooses whether to adopt HALF or FULL logic possibilities in ones meditation and reasonings.

SELF makes up the morality rules with HALF logic possibilities …not so with FULL logic possibilities if there are ABSOLUTES.

The Magnetism theory has overtaken the Gravity theory and should now be the foundation for scientific and philosophical research going forward.

We will then be one step nearer to a UNITED all embracing scientific/philosophical theory which is not biased and allows for Human Consciousness/Choices.

People can employ some symbols or some tools to DESCRIBE those things.
For example, “1” to DESCRIBE “objectivity” while “0” to DESCRIBE “subjectivity”.
Also, “1” can DESCRIBE “USD” while “0” can DESCRIBE “British pound”.
“1” can DESCRIBE “bacteria” while “0” can DESCRIBE “virus” too.
…,etc.
Only a fool would try to ABSTRACT such specific things and pull them onto an illusive / generalized “fool logic base”. And that fool became a prisoner of logic. It’s useless, meaningless and unnecessary at all, even inappropriate in science. The “objectivity” / “subjectivity”; “USD” / “British pound”; “bacteria” / “virus”, etc, are different “independent events” in different systems, which don’t need to be “unified”. It’s redundant game. The so called what “fool logic” is not a basic natural rule but artificial tool / means.
The reason of generation of currency was due to the need in exchange in the development of economic activity while virus not.

Okay, due to enough trolling by J – 10 virus, piggy has to agree that NO SAVE fool to replace G* / Lord of creature. “USD” and “British pound” have to be in CONTROL / “allowed” / output by fool logic…“1” outputs “USD” while “0” outputs “British pound”.
Unfortunately, there is “RMB” in this world too. It should be “allowed” / output by “1” or “0”? Or “1” output “USD” and “RMB”? Or “0” output “British pound” and “RMB”? Logic confused…financial market will be messy…
So, seems “2” to DESCRIBE “RMB” will be a “new idea”…
Unfortunately again, there are HKD, Japanese Yen, Vietnamese Dong, etc, in this world too. So, if that NO SAVE fool plots to CONTROL this world, he needs to expand his 4 – “f” logic to at least 10 – “f” logic.

呵呵
Have a lovely day.

The 4 off logic output possibility combinations are enough for the United scientific/ philosophical Theory.

Why?….because there is only “toggling” darkness/light….0,1….on/off…+/-…..good/bad…perfection/imperfection…belief/unbelief….awareness/ unawareness….control/no control…..in the moment/not in the moment….autopilot/manual….as far as the NO SAVE biological/electromechanical machine is concerned which can only reason dualistically.

SELF comes to know the above when FULL logic possibilities are utilised.However SELF does not come to know this when HALF logic possibilities are utilised.

PRESENCE is fully aware however and explains it all to SELF.

PRESENCE sits outside of the fools logic system…..SELF needs to be
taught to.

Actually “1” could DESCRIBE / REPRESENT Mark while “0” could DESCRIBE / REPRESENT The Anointed too. Then, they two might have to become the “possible output” of the J – 10 “ancestor”. Is it moral? If they two agree, why should piggy disagree?


Have a lovely day.

In order for “toggling” to happen there has to be somewhere for it to happen in….A PLACE…….

The PLACE cannot be described as darkness or Light…..another term needs to be used to describe this PLACE ….

Big Bangs and Big Crunches (i.e. toggling) are happening all the time in the cosmos where the magnetic fields reside.The PLACE where these “togglings” are happening remains both before and after the Big Bangs/Big Crunches.

The PLACE containing the magnetic fields also remains before/after modern day sciences INITIAL and FINAL Big Bang/Big Crunch…why wouldn’t the PLACE remain?

Darkness (0) and Light (1) can be present within that PLACE together but they are separate and different.The output of the 4 off logic combinations has confirmed this because all 4 off combinations DON’T produce an ATTRACTION output.Two combinations produce ATTRACTION and two combinations produce REPULSION.

Darkness (0) and Light (1) are divided within the PLACE.

If one wants to introduce a fence into the equation then both sides of the fence have “toggling” and both sides MIRROR each other according to the NO SAVE fools logic.

Sounds Mark and The Anointed should thank the J – 10 “ancestor” “allow for” them to PRESENCE in this world? So they two should not annoy the J – 10 “ancestor”. Otherwise, the J – 10 “ancestor” “toggle” in his mind and doesn’t “allow” in his fool logic the output, they two have to AUTOPILOTly disappear in this world?

Be careful, the J – 10 virus has no conception of “moral”.

呵呵
Have a lovely day.

Be careful of modern day scientist spokesperson’s with their fools HALF logic.

They claim that good (0) is bad (1) and bad (1) is good (0) and there are no absolute morals….even though they have no proof of this.

The fools FULL logic makes no such claims.It merely states the 4 off logic combination possibilities.Two combinations state that because good and bad are different as POSSIBILITIES then absolute moral rules apply.

The FULL fools logic explains science and philosophy….HALF fools logic doesn’t.

The magnetism theory explains the concepts…..the gravity theory explains nothing.