2
   

Cell

 
 
Reply Sun 6 Jul, 2014 01:36 am
Why do the primitive organisms have lesser number of cells as compared to more advanced forms?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 2 • Views: 920 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
luismtzzz
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Jul, 2014 02:06 am
@harsh325,
You have to be more specific with your question. I understand that you imply that unicellular organisms are primitive, compared to multicellular organisms, and thus have fewer cells.

That is a common miss conception about biology. Actual simple cellular organisms and olygocellular organisms are neither primitive nor simple.

In order to survive 3.6 billion years since the estimated origin of life they had been evolving the same ways as multicellular organisms. They had changed and adapted threw a long period of trial and error system. As well as we share a primitive ancestor with modern primates, all modern bacteria share a common primitive ancestor that is completely different to the actual species known.

Modern bacteria are nasty, strong, well built machines designed to survive extreme conditions, and thrive on the must hostile enviroment. We had adapted to defend to bacterias as fast as they had adapted to keep infecting us.

I expect this helps you. If you aremore specific i will gladily help.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Arrangement of microorganism - Question by fayorks
An animal that can photosynthesize! - Discussion by littlek
How do they fly? - Question by hannahherbener310
Test questions for evolutionites/evolosers - Discussion by gungasnake
Anti-Aging Compound identified - Discussion by rosborne979
Sex and Evolution - Discussion by gungasnake
Dogs Are People, Too - Discussion by Miller
Avoiding Death - Question by gollum
Synthetic Life - Question by Atom Blitzer
Single-Celled Organisms - Question by gollum
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Cell
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/23/2024 at 11:35:39