Reply
Tue 13 Apr, 2004 04:40 pm
If I have a line from point 0,0 to 10,10, the length is Rad(200). My question is, if I first go from 0,0 to 10,10 by going from 0,0 to 10,0 - then from 10,0 to 10,10 - the distance is 20. If I half each of those, so I'm moving 0,0 - 0,5 - 5,5 - 5,10 - 10,10 - the distance is still 20. Let's say I half the distance of each section again so its 0,0 - 0,2.5 - 2.5,2.5, etc. you get the idea - the distance is always 20. Eventually when I make the distances short enough, it approaches my first straight line. As the number of segments approach infinity, it should become that straight line. But 20 doesn't equal Rad(200). Why does this work with area but not distances? I know that this doesn't work because there's always a tiny margin of error, and when it's multiplied by the near infinity number, you get the difference between 20 and Rad(200.) But this doesn't happen in Area Integration problems.... Why not?
It seemed interesting, but you can notice that your way of approximating the line with paths which you indicated is not the idea of integration of the line.
It's not integration but it's the only word I could think of.
Slopes of the (piecewise linear) paths are zero or infinity while the slope of the original line is the constant 1, and the limiting theorem of integral does not apply here.