@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:Your recollection is no kind of evidence,
Well at least you've finally stated an accurate fact. But I'm not sure what significance there is to the fact that my recollection is not evidence.
Setanta wrote:and you recall what you want to believe for polemical reasons.
No, I recall what the stats were, because that is what the stats were.
Setanta wrote:Your "numbers are numbers" is meaningless unless you can provide those numbers,
Not at all. It was a reasonable debunking of your claim that the numbers were some sort of reflection of my own views.
Setanta wrote:and, as always, you don't provide any evidence at all.
Wrong again. I am nearly always willing to back up what I say with evidence.
This case is an exception simply for the fact that I don't feel like tracking down something I saw 10-15 years ago.